Supply shortfall may occur at any time of the year - in summer a lot of plant will be withdrawn for maintenance (on a grid-planned basis). It's a VERY rare event as we all know. We don't want another "Emperor's Clothes" scare going the rounds. In fact, the planning to match predicted demand (which is accurate to 3% for the elctricity market - much better than the gas market) against generation is carried out on a continual half hourly basis, with longer views for maintenance planning. Generation and load are matched to achieve a less than 1 in 20 probability of generation shortfall (i.e. one event every 20 years). It's done by intersecting probability functions of load requirement (Gaussian) and generation (previously Gaussian but now increasingly complicated by wind (Weibull).adam2 wrote:Rota cuts due to lack of generating capacity are clearly more likely in winter also as the peak load is in winter, in the UK.
We have not had widespread rota cuts since the industrial disputes of the 1970s, but it could happen again, and would be most likely in severe cold weather.
Not a good time to be reliant on electricity for heating.
We had one day of rota cuts more recently, in mild weather, due to a most unusuall series of generating plant breakdowns.
Report here
http://www.nationalgrid.com/NR/rdonlyre ... Issue1.pdf
To try and build a case for the electricity grid being beset with major and repeated interruptions is a waste of time. I am aware of the remarks of Holliday, but frankly I think it's a great deal more likely that he'll be moved on after that performance, than rota cuts being commonplace.
If it were a commonplace event then I would expect emergency boiler power supplies to be commonplace - but I know of no manufacturer who makes one. Gravity feed will work, but only for part of the house with solid fuel.
The grid event you refer to was not a rota cut. It was a low frequency incident as is obvious from the title of the report:
"Report of the investigation into the automatic demand disconnection following multiple generation losses and the demand control response that occurred on the 27th May 2008"
The cause is well described therein:
"On the morning of 27th May an unrelated and near simultaneous loss of generation at Generator A (345MW at 11.34am) and Generator B (1237MW at 11.36am), totalling some 1582MW at the time of loss, gave rise to a drop in system frequency to 49.14Hz. Following this there was a further, as yet not fully explained loss, which led to a further drop in system frequency to 48.795Hz."
All very coy! Generator A was Longannet, B was Sizewell, and the "further, as yet not fully explained loss" was the wind fleet tripping because of low frequency.
There is one disturbing aspect of this for our friends in the south. If there are shortfalls in generation, the effect will be hardest felt in the SE of the country because most of the generation is in the north and west, and the SE will experience both low voltage incidents as well as low frequency. I've got my nice nuke down the road.