Cost of natural disasters soars - Munich Re

For threads primarily discussing Climate Change (particularly in relation to Peak Oil)

Moderator: Peak Moderation

stumuzz

Post by stumuzz »

Andy Hunt wrote:That wouldn't be the global village you refer to then, eh.
Sorry too cryptic, could you elucidate further?
stumuzz

Post by stumuzz »

JohnB wrote:
stumuzz wrote:But I ask the same question again. What effect is CC having on these multifarious people of my village and what are they avoiding?
Not directly weather related, but haven't they noticed birds migrating and plants flowering at different times to what they have been used to for most of their lives? Climate change isn't expected to have the same effect everywhere in the world. If you happen to live in a part that doesn't seem to be affected by it, are you saying that's a reason not to do anything, even if many are suffering in other places?
Although I have not spoken to them about it they probably have. Last ten years have seen earlier springs, the last two have been later. They were probably expecting record hot summers and got mild wet ones. I doubt very much that they think it is their fault.

I am not saying we should do nothing about climate change. I believe that digging stuff out of the ground to burn it and process it just to re dig it into landfill is a silly idea for the environment. However, what do you want people to do? Give a few concrete examples people can follow e.g. Don’t have children or if you have more than one child have ‘climate terrorist tattooed’ on your forehead, encourage everyone on the minimum wage to give up work and get an allotment. Instead of navel gazing come up with real practicable ideas that most people can follow and become engaged in.

I still don’t accept that these people have internalised climate change theory and come to the conclusion it is their fault and decided to do nothing about it.
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14823
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

stumuzz wrote:
Andy Hunt wrote:That wouldn't be the global village you refer to then, eh.
Sorry too cryptic, could you elucidate further?
It's fairly obvious to thick ol' me.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
stumuzz

Post by stumuzz »

emordnilap wrote:
stumuzz wrote:
Andy Hunt wrote:That wouldn't be the global village you refer to then, eh.
Sorry too cryptic, could you elucidate further?
It's fairly obvious to thick ol' me.
Could you explain it then, please
User avatar
Andy Hunt
Posts: 6760
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Bury, Lancashire, UK

Post by Andy Hunt »

Wikipedia is your friend.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_village_(term)
Today, the term "Global Village" is mostly used as a metaphor to describe the Internet and World Wide Web.[citation needed] On the Internet, physical distance is even less of a hindrance to the real-time communicative activities of people, and therefore social spheres are greatly expanded by the openness of the web and the ease at which people can search for online communities and interact with others that share the same interests and concerns. Therefore, this technology fosters the idea of a conglomerate yet unified global community.[5] Due to the enhanced speed of communication online and the ability of people to read about, spread, and react to global news very rapidly, McLuhan says this forces us to become more involved with one another from countries around the world and be more aware of our global responsibilities.[6]
Andy Hunt
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
Eternal Sunshine wrote: I wouldn't want to worry you with the truth. :roll:
User avatar
Andy Hunt
Posts: 6760
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Bury, Lancashire, UK

Post by Andy Hunt »

Andy Hunt
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
Eternal Sunshine wrote: I wouldn't want to worry you with the truth. :roll:
Post Reply