Decide when to leave

Forum for general discussion of Peak Oil / Oil depletion; also covering related subjects

Moderator: Peak Moderation

Post Reply

Regarding to leave do you think it's more important:

Where
8
53%
When
7
47%
How
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 15

User avatar
kevincarter
Posts: 40
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09

Decide when to leave

Post by kevincarter »

I read some of the stories of the "we burned so bright" competition. There is one that talks about how important is to decide when to leave. History is full of examples; ask the Germans who decided to leave East Berlin just in time. Or the people that decided to leave the second tower when the first was hit. I'm sure in both cases many people thought that there was going to be plenty of time to leave later, or that it wasn't going to be that bad to stay, or that somebody would do something about it. But they were worng.

What do you think is more important: where, when, or how?
Truth, if it goes beyond any reasonable doubt.
broadoak
Posts: 23
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Nottingham, England

my thoughts exactly

Post by broadoak »

Yeah. To be honest, I feel a bit confused as to when things are likely to start getting desparate, with society breaking down, etc. Who should we believe, regarding the timing?
'even the snail
leaves a stardust trail'.
bigjim
Posts: 694
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Cleethorpes

Post by bigjim »

Leave for where? Venus? You'll have to hope the Mekon will offer you a warm welcome.

We can't leave this planet- unfortunately that's the only reliable way to escape human society!
fishertrop
Posts: 859
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Sheffield

Post by fishertrop »

I guess it depends on your specific circumstances.

Even tho I live in a semi-suburban area, I am not planning to leave unless the situation becomes insane, in which case I'll probably be joining a stream of refugees :cry:

I don't think there are many places I CAN go that would be any better.

Plus, eveyone in the UK can't all "leave" and whilst I try to be ahead of the masses as much as I can I think on this one I'll have to stick around and do my bit to make things work like eveyone else.
bigjim
Posts: 694
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Cleethorpes

Post by bigjim »

We could move to Norway... they're a massive exporter of oil. Even though they peaked a few years back, they don't use much. So they'll have plenty of energy for themselves for years to come. Unless the UK decides to invade
fishertrop
Posts: 859
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Sheffield

Post by fishertrop »

But when the gulf stream shuts off won't they be twice as cold as the UK ?
User avatar
Bandidoz
Site Admin
Posts: 2705
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Berks

Post by Bandidoz »

Where - pick somewhere that has a good climate for growing stuff, and that has the minimum people per hectare.
Olduvai Theory (Updated) (Reviewed)
Easter Island - a warning from history : http://dieoff.org/page145.htm
User avatar
isenhand
Posts: 1296
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by isenhand »

fishertrop wrote: I don't think there are many places I CAN go that would be any better.
This one is an interesting problem and one that I have been thinking about. Not sure if I have a possible solution but what about looking at alternative means of producing food? Things like hydroponics or permaculture of some sort? I don?t think that that will provide all the food needs of a family in suburbia but together with growing food in a garden could contribute part of. The then next part would be networking with others in the same area and with communities in the country. Hmm ? needs a lot more thought but it?s a start!

:)
The only future we have is the one we make!

Technocracy:
http://en.technocracynet.eu

http://www.lulu.com/technocracy

http://www.technocracy.tk/
Post Reply