French Regional Elections

What can we do to change the minds of decision makers and people in general to actually do something about preparing for the forthcoming economic/energy crises (the ones after this one!)?

Moderator: Peak Moderation

Post Reply
User avatar
clv101
Site Admin
Posts: 10550
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Contact:

French Regional Elections

Post by clv101 »

French far right 'routed' in key vote
France's far-right Front National is beaten into third place in regional elections, exit polls indicate
Early results...
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

Looks like they have haven't won a single region.
France's Far-Right Nationalist Party Swings From First To Worst; "Routed' In Regional Election Run-Off
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-12-1 ... ection-run
johnhemming2
Posts: 2159
Joined: 30 Jun 2015, 22:01

Post by johnhemming2 »

The point is that many people will vote against the fascists. FN are somewhere between the BNP and UKIP.

Hence they actually need a majority. I think they did get 42.5% in one region. Hence it is not in terms of support on the ground a "rout" although they lost.
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

johnhemming2 wrote: somewhere between the BNP and UKIP.
There's a difference?
johnhemming2
Posts: 2159
Joined: 30 Jun 2015, 22:01

Post by johnhemming2 »

biffvernon wrote:
johnhemming2 wrote: somewhere between the BNP and UKIP.
There's a difference?
Politics has a number of details that it is worth understanding. The BNP are/were a racist party. UKIP are a party with some racists, but
a) UKIP are not inherently racist. They allow non-white candidates and even had a Muslim MEP.
b) They do not tolerate people who publicly encourage racial hatred.

That does not mean that Nigel Farage does not play the race card, but they are not actually the BNP in Blazers.
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

How many angels did you say can dance on a pin?
Little John

Post by Little John »

biffvernon wrote:
johnhemming2 wrote: somewhere between the BNP and UKIP.
There's a difference?
Yes because, despite their obvious similarities on immigration matters, the BNP is a party of big-state, anti-capitalist tribalism and UKIP is a party of small state, pro-capitalist individualism.

Whilst some of their various supporters may well have limited allegiances to both parties based upon the limited similarity of their immigration policies and EU stance, the philosophical place that these parties are coming from is quite different. Indeed, I would say, of the two, the BNP is the most philosophically consistent, however revolted one may be by many of their their policies. UKIP, on the other hand, is neither fish nor fowl given it's pro-global-capitalist stance and simultaneous professed dislike of cheap, imported labour.
Last edited by Little John on 13 Dec 2015, 23:14, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
UndercoverElephant
Posts: 13496
Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
Location: UK

Post by UndercoverElephant »

biffvernon wrote:How many angels did you say can dance on a pin?
You should try reading more, and understanding more.

You asked a question. You were given an educated, informed answer. You ignored it, and made an inappropriate, facetious comment, and will no doubt continue to remain ignorant of the answer to the question you asked.
Post Reply