The UK Low Carbon Transition Plan
Posted: 24 Jul 2009, 14:24
Just wondered if anyone has read it, who might be following it.
http://www.decc.gov.uk/Media/viewfil...pdf&filetype=4
It seems ambitious to say the least, quite a surprise in some ways, but I'm not really sure what to make of it TBH.
It starts off quite encouraging, that the UK has cut its carbon emissons by 21% since 1990, which is pretty good really, shows it can be done. A lot of this though has been due to a big switch to gas generators instead of coal, something which has started to swing back to coal again in recent years as our gas supplies get more depleted and more expensive. And the recession is cutting energy use.
Then it goes on to detail the various kinds of renewable energy technologies which the country is going to switch over to. There are a few million pounds here and there to support the development of existing technologies, nothing like what has gone to the banks in bail-outs though.
The government seem to think they can force a massive switch to investment in renewables through non-taxation carbon trading schemes like the European ETS and the new Carbon Reduction Commitment, plus an increasing legal obligation on the energy suppliers.
The graph showing carbon cuts, which really kick in after 2012, seems to worryingly resemble the schedule for closure of old nuclear and coal power plants though. So any new coal it is presumed will have carbon capture and storage fitted (far from reality at present).
As most of the carbon cuts are on the heavy industrial and energy generation side of things, it does seem to be a bit of an 'all (or at least most) eggs in one basket' though. Renewable energy is notoriously difficult to produce in industrial scale quantities, on a steady and reliable basis. There are ways round it but tricky for industrial processes.
I can't help thinking that maybe retaining some gas and nuclear power stations, adjacent to industrial sites and supplying said sites with steam and hot water as well as electricity, on private distribution networks would be a good thing.
But I'm really not sure current levels of consumption in domestic homes, shops etc can really be maintained. It might end up being more of a question of mini-grids, with each locality generating as much as it can from local renewable sources. There would still be a national grid as backup, but I just can't see the sense in industrial scale energy supporting domestic consumption when it leaves industry priced out of the market, which is what has been happening for a little while now.
Why should we pull out all the stops and chuck our remaining resources into supporting a consumer economy buying cheap trinkets from China, where industrial pollution standards are so much lower?
Just can't help thinking this plan is just business as usual, really. And the BAU model is looking a bit tatty around the edges these days really isn't it.
http://www.decc.gov.uk/Media/viewfil...pdf&filetype=4
It seems ambitious to say the least, quite a surprise in some ways, but I'm not really sure what to make of it TBH.
It starts off quite encouraging, that the UK has cut its carbon emissons by 21% since 1990, which is pretty good really, shows it can be done. A lot of this though has been due to a big switch to gas generators instead of coal, something which has started to swing back to coal again in recent years as our gas supplies get more depleted and more expensive. And the recession is cutting energy use.
Then it goes on to detail the various kinds of renewable energy technologies which the country is going to switch over to. There are a few million pounds here and there to support the development of existing technologies, nothing like what has gone to the banks in bail-outs though.
The government seem to think they can force a massive switch to investment in renewables through non-taxation carbon trading schemes like the European ETS and the new Carbon Reduction Commitment, plus an increasing legal obligation on the energy suppliers.
The graph showing carbon cuts, which really kick in after 2012, seems to worryingly resemble the schedule for closure of old nuclear and coal power plants though. So any new coal it is presumed will have carbon capture and storage fitted (far from reality at present).
As most of the carbon cuts are on the heavy industrial and energy generation side of things, it does seem to be a bit of an 'all (or at least most) eggs in one basket' though. Renewable energy is notoriously difficult to produce in industrial scale quantities, on a steady and reliable basis. There are ways round it but tricky for industrial processes.
I can't help thinking that maybe retaining some gas and nuclear power stations, adjacent to industrial sites and supplying said sites with steam and hot water as well as electricity, on private distribution networks would be a good thing.
But I'm really not sure current levels of consumption in domestic homes, shops etc can really be maintained. It might end up being more of a question of mini-grids, with each locality generating as much as it can from local renewable sources. There would still be a national grid as backup, but I just can't see the sense in industrial scale energy supporting domestic consumption when it leaves industry priced out of the market, which is what has been happening for a little while now.
Why should we pull out all the stops and chuck our remaining resources into supporting a consumer economy buying cheap trinkets from China, where industrial pollution standards are so much lower?
Just can't help thinking this plan is just business as usual, really. And the BAU model is looking a bit tatty around the edges these days really isn't it.