General Election Dec 2019 thread
Moderator: Peak Moderation
- Lord Beria3
- Posts: 5066
- Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 20:57
- Location: Moscow Russia
- Contact:
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14290
- Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
- Location: Newbury, Berkshire
- Contact:
God help us all then. We'll end up like Israel with a bunch of nutters controlling what goes on in government and the country without a government for months as small parties wring what they can out of major parties. The DUP deal will look upfront and normal.
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
- UndercoverElephant
- Posts: 13500
- Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
- Location: UK
I don't believe the deadlock will continue indefinitely. Three things will break it: brexit actually happening, brexit conclusively not happening, and Corbyn retiring and being replaced by Kier Starmer. Personally I think all three will lead to a Labour government. The tories can't go on governing forever.
- UndercoverElephant
- Posts: 13500
- Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
- Location: UK
Indeed, I expect Johnson's calamity government to come to a sticky end before the five year term, before we have a comprehensive trade deal with either US or EU, and a resurgent Labour under new leadership to win a decent majority.UndercoverElephant wrote: The tories can't go on governing forever.
The next few years are looking like more of the same unfortunately though.
Labour's problems are not the result of Corbyn per se. They are the result of Corbyn capitulating to the Blairites in his party and allowing Labour to become a Remain party. This has then allowed the bullshit smears that, hitherto, did not stick, to begin to do so as a consequence of the working class having been betrayed.clv101 wrote:Indeed, I expect Johnson's calamity government to come to a sticky end before the five year term, before we have a comprehensive trade deal with either US or EU, and a resurgent Labour under new leadership to win a decent majority.UndercoverElephant wrote: The tories can't go on governing forever.
The next few years are looking like more of the same unfortunately though.
You clearly have no real idea of what is happening. This is not about "Leave" or "Remain". They are merely proxies for the divide between a globalist oriented bourgeoisie and a nation state oriented proletariat.clv101 wrote:The remain/leave dynamic is going to rapidly fall away once we're in the transition period. The arguments over the nature of future trade deals are likely to be far more nuanced.
I do wonder whether Farage's new Reform Party will be able to capitalise on the general malaise.
That is not going away either here or elsewhere.
I totally agree, you brought up Labour being a remain party, my point is that it's not about leave or remain anymore - it's about the nature of the trade agreements - which is, as you say, globalist Vs the nation state. We agree.Little John wrote:You clearly have no real idea of what is happening. This is not about "Leave" or "Remain". They are merely proxies for the divide between a globalist oriented bourgeoisie and a nation state oriented proletariat.clv101 wrote:The remain/leave dynamic is going to rapidly fall away once we're in the transition period. The arguments over the nature of future trade deals are likely to be far more nuanced.
I do wonder whether Farage's new Reform Party will be able to capitalise on the general malaise.
That is not going away either here or elsewhere.
- UndercoverElephant
- Posts: 13500
- Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
- Location: UK
Corbyn didn't "capitulate". The Labour Party has an internal democratic process for making strategic policy decisions, and Corbyn merely abided by that process. The Labour Party made that decision.Little John wrote: They are the result of Corbyn capitulating to the Blairites in his party and allowing Labour to become a Remain party. This has then allowed the bullshit smears that, hitherto, did not stick, to begin to do so as a consequence of the working class having been betrayed.
Because the Labour party is a Blairite, neo-liberal, globalist, capitalist party just like the Democrat Party in the USA. All of which means Corbyn is someone who talks at least some of the talk but who does precisely none of the walk when push comes to shove which makes him, at best, a distraction and, at worst, a false God.UndercoverElephant wrote:Corbyn didn't "capitulate". The Labour Party has an internal democratic process for making strategic policy decisions, and Corbyn merely abided by that process. The Labour Party made that decision.Little John wrote: They are the result of Corbyn capitulating to the Blairites in his party and allowing Labour to become a Remain party. This has then allowed the bullshit smears that, hitherto, did not stick, to begin to do so as a consequence of the working class having been betrayed.
Labour are "controlled opposition". They are worse than useless in terms of the change that is required.
- UndercoverElephant
- Posts: 13500
- Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
- Location: UK
This post is as detached from reality as Beria's posts claiming Corbyn is anti-semitic.Little John wrote:Because the Labour party is a Blairite, neo-liberal, globalist, capitalist party just like the Democrat Party in the USA.
The Labour Party is controlled by by momentum, and it is the exact opposite of a "Blairite, neo-liberal, globalist, capitalist party just like the Democrat Party in the USA."
Momentum are beurgoise, middle class, identity politics driven Blairites in disguise. The disguise being so effective even the ideologically obsessed dumb fucks in Momentum don't know it is a disguise. Sounds to me, that's probably not too far off an adequate description of you.UndercoverElephant wrote:This post is as detached from reality as Beria's posts claiming Corbyn is anti-semitic.Little John wrote:Because the Labour party is a Blairite, neo-liberal, globalist, capitalist party just like the Democrat Party in the USA.
The Labour Party is controlled by by momentum, and it is the exact opposite of a "Blairite, neo-liberal, globalist, capitalist party just like the Democrat Party in the USA."
- UndercoverElephant
- Posts: 13500
- Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
- Location: UK
If you genuinely believe that then you have, I am afraid, totally lost the plot. Identity politics? Yes, there's plenty of that. Blairites? No they f***ing well aren't. They are the reason the Blairites have been hounded out of the party.Little John wrote:Momentum are beurgoise, middle class, identity politics driven Blairites in disguise.
This is so damned obvious that I am struggling to believe that somebody as politically informed as you are could possibly fail to understand it. The whole point in momentum was to wrest control of the party from the Blairites and turn Labour from a centrist part into a socialist party, and that is exactly what they've done.
Disguise. Yeah, a manifesto promising to renationalise the railways and utilities, implement a 4-day week and roll out free broadband to every house in the country...that's "Blairism in disguise".The disguise being so effective even the ideologically obsessed dumb fucks in Momentum don't know it is a disguise. Sounds to me, that's probably not too far off an adequate description of you.
You're bonkers, Steve. This election has driven you mad.