General Election May 2015
Moderator: Peak Moderation
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
My guess is that the two tests were done by a two human beings interpreting the policies in the light of the questions.emordnilap wrote: Presumably they are the same questions. Can someone tell me why the different positions?
Where a question can be answered with a 'strongly' or a 'moderately' it's a thin line between which one might tick but the 'moderately' scores closest to the centre and the 'strongly' takes you towards the corners.
Being a person of stout opinion I scored right in the corner. Others with a similar political outlook might be a bit to the north-east of me. (Like the Green Party)
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14815
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
I've emailed them asking for clarification. I accept there may be some slight overlap but it is quite a move, considering the only difference is a slightly different location.biffvernon wrote:My guess is that the two tests were done by a two human beings interpreting the policies in the light of the questions.emordnilap wrote: Presumably they are the same questions. Can someone tell me why the different positions?
Where a question can be answered with a 'strongly' or a 'moderately' it's a thin line between which one might tick but the 'moderately' scores closest to the centre and the 'strongly' takes you towards the corners.
Being a person of stout opinion I scored right in the corner. Others with a similar political outlook might be a bit to the north-east of me. (Like the Green Party)
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
Well, I don't think there's anything set in concrete about the largest partner in a coalition supplying the PM. They may decide between them that AS would make the better statesman. AS could even make this a condition of any coalition, supported by those in Labour who are embarrassed by the presence of EM. Wouldn't be the first time the UK had a Scottish PM.clv101 wrote:With the election only a few weeks away, it now seems likely we'll have Labour / SNP coalition... which would likely make Alex Salmond deputy PM!
ETA: Maybe AS has seen this coming, or it has been part of the Master Plan. I always thought it was a bit fishy the way he so promptly stood aside after the referendum.
Engage in geo-engineering. Plant a tree today.
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
Latest YOUGOV poll
Code: Select all
YOUGOV Voting intentions aged 18-24
Labour 37%
Greens 23%
Conservatives 23%
UKIP 7%
LIBDEMS 7%
SNP / PC 3%
But 23% Don't Know/Won't vote
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14815
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
That last 23% looks suspiciously low.PS_RalphW wrote:Latest YOUGOV poll
Code: Select all
YOUGOV Voting intentions aged 18-24 Labour 37% Greens 23% Conservatives 23% UKIP 7% LIBDEMS 7% SNP / PC 3% But 23% Don't Know/Won't vote
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
-
- Posts: 823
- Joined: 08 Nov 2010, 00:09
This has got to be worth a look when it airs....
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-enter ... 46787.html
As for the country being in meltdown? Not likely, UKIP would most likely be true-blue Tory a la Thatcher style, not the totalitarians they are portrayed to be. Certainly not great, but hardly likely to cause total meltdown IMHO.
At the end of the day, Farage et al is likely to be a party for the corporations /rich, so UKIPs policies on immigration are likely to be watered down somewhat.
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-enter ... 46787.html
As for the country being in meltdown? Not likely, UKIP would most likely be true-blue Tory a la Thatcher style, not the totalitarians they are portrayed to be. Certainly not great, but hardly likely to cause total meltdown IMHO.
At the end of the day, Farage et al is likely to be a party for the corporations /rich, so UKIPs policies on immigration are likely to be watered down somewhat.
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 823
- Joined: 08 Nov 2010, 00:09
-
- Posts: 823
- Joined: 08 Nov 2010, 00:09
Interesting comments from Noel Gallagher
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politic ... -time.html
You can take his comments with a pinch of salt, but what he's calling for is effectively proportional representation (which we decided against IIRC).
His comments about everything going wonky after 9/11 were a bit surprising.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politic ... -time.html
You can take his comments with a pinch of salt, but what he's calling for is effectively proportional representation (which we decided against IIRC).
His comments about everything going wonky after 9/11 were a bit surprising.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14290
- Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
- Location: Newbury, Berkshire
- Contact:
There's a link to a poll on that page which asks which party you side with.
Mine came out as UKIP 81%, BNP 72%, Labour 68%, LibDems 65%, Conservatives and Green 63%. I definitely wouldn't vote for the first four choices and I'm tossing up between the next two. I might vote for my current MP rather than his party but I'm not sure about that at the moment.
Mine came out as UKIP 81%, BNP 72%, Labour 68%, LibDems 65%, Conservatives and Green 63%. I definitely wouldn't vote for the first four choices and I'm tossing up between the next two. I might vote for my current MP rather than his party but I'm not sure about that at the moment.
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
Hmm.. I came out; labour 90%, libdem 83%, green 82%, SNP 76%, Conservative 46%.
A little surprising, as I'm actually a SNP member!
The thing is, alignment with policies isn't necessarily an indicator of voting intent. I would never vote labour, despite supporting many of their policies, because I simply don't trust that they would be implemented. Even with three consecutive terms with an overall majority, they still managed to get side-tracked by political correctness, ideology and geo-political ambitions, rather than just getting on with the job of running the country more effectively.
A little surprising, as I'm actually a SNP member!
The thing is, alignment with policies isn't necessarily an indicator of voting intent. I would never vote labour, despite supporting many of their policies, because I simply don't trust that they would be implemented. Even with three consecutive terms with an overall majority, they still managed to get side-tracked by political correctness, ideology and geo-political ambitions, rather than just getting on with the job of running the country more effectively.
Engage in geo-engineering. Plant a tree today.
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact: