Power station to convert back to coal

To what extent will biofuels be part of our energy future?

Moderator: Peak Moderation

Post Reply
User avatar
Catweazle
Posts: 3388
Joined: 17 Feb 2008, 12:04
Location: Petite Bourgeois, over the hills

Power station to convert back to coal

Post by Catweazle »

A little bird tells me that Tilbury power station, currently co-fired biomass and oil, is converting to burn coal.

The word in the power station is that we can expect power cuts by 2015 and will need to import the vast majority of our electricity.
User avatar
clv101
Site Admin
Posts: 10549
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Contact:

Re: Power station to convert back to coal

Post by clv101 »

Catweazle wrote:The word in the power station is that we can expect power cuts by 2015 and will need to import the vast majority of our electricity.
I gave a presentation in 2005 saying power cuts were likely as a function of the LCPD closures, nuclear decommission, North Sea gas depletion and slow renewable rollout. Eight years later, it's remarkable how little has happened to change this assessment.
User avatar
RenewableCandy
Posts: 12777
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
Location: York

Post by RenewableCandy »

However, I also remember Matt Savinar being interviewed by Jon Snow on C4 news one night that autumn saying he reckoned power cuts would start "this win(t)er" (yes I can still remember his accent!) but they didn't materialise then, which I think has put everybody (back) to sleep.
Soyez réaliste. Demandez l'impossible.
Stories
The Price of Time
User avatar
PS_RalphW
Posts: 6978
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Cambridge

Post by PS_RalphW »

However,

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-23433226

New biomass power station approved.

Still, it is increasing the UK generating capacity, even if we have to ship in the virgin forest biomass from Canada or Sweden.
:roll:
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14815
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

'Biomass' (what a polite word) is weasely as bad as coal, which at least occasionally has the small merit of being dug out from underground. There, that's enough apologies for coal.

I don't know the figures but let me guess - CO2 emissions are much worse from a 'biomass'-fired power station than a coal-fired one, per unit of usable energy delivered.

Never mind more trees get planted. They take a long time to grow. And I can see more people displaced and their land and water stolen for mono crop trees in the likes of Africa. Not to mention the potential for Monsatan.

So there you go: either cut your energy use down to the bone or do your bit to fúck up the planet; your choice. Which type are you?
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
Post Reply