Rota power cuts and voltage reductions
Posted: 23 Sep 2010, 16:35
In the past, when electricity has been in short supply it has been in effect rationed by either imposing voltage reductions, or rota power cuts.
The idea being to reduce the load so as to match the available supply.
This was last done on a regular basis in the 1970s when coal miners struck and power stations ran short of coal.
More recently*, rota cuts and voltage reductions were imposed on a "one off" basis due to the very rare, near simultaneos breakdown of two large generating units.
The load reduction achieved recently by rota cuts and voltage reductions was much less than expected.
If rota cuts and voltage reductions become widespread, I fear that the savings will be far less than expected, and that therefore larger areas will have to be cut off for longer, than is being expected.
There two reasons for this
Firstly, an increasing proportion of the electrical demand is by appliances with switched mode regulating circuits.
Reducing the voltage to such loads saves nothing whatsover, indeed a very slight increase is likely.
Such loads include virtually all IT stuff, electronic lighting ballasts, and industrial motors on variable speed drives, and many other motors.
A lot of the remaing load is thermostatic water or space heating, this will consume less power for the first few minutes of any voltage reduction, but after about 10 minutes the load rises to the previous figure (due to each appliance running longer to give the required output)
The contribution from some embeded microgeneration would be lost as the grid tied inverters wont tolerate the reduced voltage.
Rota power cuts can also shed far less load than expected, especialy if repeated or prolonged.
If 10% of the national load is disconnected, then in the short term 10% less power is needed.
If however the emergency continues for some hours, then the savings become less. For example, after a few hours it would be the norm to reconnect those blacked out, and to blackout a different area, in the interests of fairness. Unfortunatly, when the supply is restored, virtualy every thermostatic heating or cooling appliance will draw power at it attempts to catch up.
Therefore the formerly blacked out area may consume 50% more power than normal for an hour or so, meaning that a larger area has to blacked out to compensate.
And of course ALL micro generation in the cut off area is lost, so for example cutting off 100MW of load might lose 5MW of embeded generation for a net saving of only 95MW.
If rota cuts become prolonged, then the savings are even less for several reasons. For example an electric bakery wont stop making bread, they will simply transfer production to the times when the power is on, and use exactly the same KWH in total.
If someone knows that the power will be off when they normally take a bath/shower, they MIGHT go without, but more likely will shower or bathe when the power is on, thereby useing exactly the same energy in total.
Also, in urban districts the areas cut off or turned on are fairly small in area, at any one time.
Those with homes or busineses on the boundaries will make arrangements to obtain power by private cable or even extension leads from premises still on, thereby increasing the load on such areas.
Not very encouraging is it !
To save 10% of electricity, a lot more than 10% of consumers would have to be disconnected.
*link to report
http://www.nationalgrid.com/NR/rdonlyre ... Issue1.pdf
Into exceptional loss of generating capacity leading to discconnections.
Edit to add link to report.
The idea being to reduce the load so as to match the available supply.
This was last done on a regular basis in the 1970s when coal miners struck and power stations ran short of coal.
More recently*, rota cuts and voltage reductions were imposed on a "one off" basis due to the very rare, near simultaneos breakdown of two large generating units.
The load reduction achieved recently by rota cuts and voltage reductions was much less than expected.
If rota cuts and voltage reductions become widespread, I fear that the savings will be far less than expected, and that therefore larger areas will have to be cut off for longer, than is being expected.
There two reasons for this
Firstly, an increasing proportion of the electrical demand is by appliances with switched mode regulating circuits.
Reducing the voltage to such loads saves nothing whatsover, indeed a very slight increase is likely.
Such loads include virtually all IT stuff, electronic lighting ballasts, and industrial motors on variable speed drives, and many other motors.
A lot of the remaing load is thermostatic water or space heating, this will consume less power for the first few minutes of any voltage reduction, but after about 10 minutes the load rises to the previous figure (due to each appliance running longer to give the required output)
The contribution from some embeded microgeneration would be lost as the grid tied inverters wont tolerate the reduced voltage.
Rota power cuts can also shed far less load than expected, especialy if repeated or prolonged.
If 10% of the national load is disconnected, then in the short term 10% less power is needed.
If however the emergency continues for some hours, then the savings become less. For example, after a few hours it would be the norm to reconnect those blacked out, and to blackout a different area, in the interests of fairness. Unfortunatly, when the supply is restored, virtualy every thermostatic heating or cooling appliance will draw power at it attempts to catch up.
Therefore the formerly blacked out area may consume 50% more power than normal for an hour or so, meaning that a larger area has to blacked out to compensate.
And of course ALL micro generation in the cut off area is lost, so for example cutting off 100MW of load might lose 5MW of embeded generation for a net saving of only 95MW.
If rota cuts become prolonged, then the savings are even less for several reasons. For example an electric bakery wont stop making bread, they will simply transfer production to the times when the power is on, and use exactly the same KWH in total.
If someone knows that the power will be off when they normally take a bath/shower, they MIGHT go without, but more likely will shower or bathe when the power is on, thereby useing exactly the same energy in total.
Also, in urban districts the areas cut off or turned on are fairly small in area, at any one time.
Those with homes or busineses on the boundaries will make arrangements to obtain power by private cable or even extension leads from premises still on, thereby increasing the load on such areas.
Not very encouraging is it !
To save 10% of electricity, a lot more than 10% of consumers would have to be disconnected.
*link to report
http://www.nationalgrid.com/NR/rdonlyre ... Issue1.pdf
Into exceptional loss of generating capacity leading to discconnections.
Edit to add link to report.