Denier exposed!!!!
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 17:46
I wouldn't have believed it, but it must be true
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/b ... aron-cohen
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/b ... aron-cohen
The UK's Peak Oil Discussion Forum & Community
https://forum.powerswitch.org.uk/
It's very interesting that, apart form having his views completely shot down after misrepresenting the science, he resorted to ad hominem attacks on his detractors. The bloke's either stupid or a liar and I think I know which one he is.After a presentation by Monckton at Bethel University (Minnesota) in October 2009, Professor John P Abraham[40] of University of St. Thomas (Minnesota) produced a rebuttal to Monckton's claims. John Abraham investigated the origins of many of the claims by contacting the authors of those papers Monckton had cited[35][41][42] and found that "he had misrepresented the science".[42] Monckton responded to Abraham's statement soon after, stating, "he looks like an overcooked prawn", and expressing the view that Abraham had repeatedly misquoted him to third-party scientists and had then obtained understandably hostile comments from them, which he had improperly used against Monckton. John Abraham's responses to Monckton's criticisms were that Monckton "dealt with a small number of very peripheral issues", and that it did not address the "many serious scientific lapses which were present in your [Monckton's] presentation". [43]
Monckton "initiated the process of having Abraham hauled up before whatever academic panel his Bible College can muster, to answer disciplinary charges of wilful academic dishonesty amounting to gross professional misconduct unbecoming a member of his profession",[44] and asked that Abraham's talk be removed from the University servers, and a donation of $10,000 and $100,000 be made respectively by Abraham and the University to the "United States Association of the Order of Malta for its charitable work in Haiti".[45][46] The university responded that "The University of St Thomas respects your right to disagree with Professor Abraham, just as the University respects Professor Abraham's right to disagree with you. What we object to are your personal attacks against Father Dease, and Professor Abraham, your inflammatory language, and your decision to disparage Professor Abraham Father Dease and The Univerity of St Thomas"[47][48], and it refused all of Monckton's demands.[49]