Grid-Stabilizing - Hawaii Style!

Is Solar Power going to give the UK the energy it needs for the 21st century?

Moderator: Peak Moderation

Post Reply
User avatar
Mr. Fox
Posts: 669
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: In the Dark - looking for my socks

Grid-Stabilizing - Hawaii Style!

Post by Mr. Fox »

Looks like the smart-grid just got a bit more cleverer...
800,000 Microinverters Remotely Retrofitted on Oahu—in One Day

Utilities are asking more of the rooftop solar systems that increasingly are popping up throughout their distribition grids. As we profile in this month’s Spectrum, leading utilities are deputizing solar system’s inverters to function as junior grid regulators to help stabilize the grid. Hawaiian Electric Company and inverter manufacturer Enphase Energy just showed how swiftly such upgrades can happen.

In a single day Enphase and HECO remotely reprogrammed some 800,000 microinverters attached to individual photovoltaic panels on Oahu, accounting for roughly 60 percent of the island’s distributed solar capacity according to Ameet Konkar, Enphase Energy’s senior director for strategic initiatives. Those systems deliver up to 140 megawatts, nearly as much power as the state’s largest conventional power plant, says Konkar.

Oahu needs higher-functioning solar systems because it leads the U.S. in per capita solar penetration, with 12 percent of residential customers operating rooftop systems. Island grids are more susceptible to even small perturbations, such as occurs when trees fall on wires and lightning strikes. The solar upgrade will help HECO’s grid ride through the resulting power glitches.

Whereas standards required solar systems to shut down at the first sign of substandard AC voltage and frequency, HECO and Enphase’s upgrade instructs the PV microinverters to ride through such irregularities. Like the momentum in a conventional power plant’s spinning turbines, the solar systems’ enduring power generation should help restabilize the grid’s AC signal.
Source: IEEE

See also this excellent article:
Firstly, tens of millions of dollars of expense were avoided which will implicitly avoid that cost needing to be passed on to customers. So Enphase theoretically just helped to keep the operating cost of the networks down, and the retail price of electricity too.

Secondly, although materiality is unclear at this point, by riding through more events rather than shutting down at the whiff of a drift in frequency, 800,000 solar inverters will be on-line for more time. That delivers better yield and more savings for consumers and in the case of Hawaii, less oil burned for conventional generation. So they just made more money for their customers.

Third, Enphase’s clever little solution saved the network a whole lot of money, because they had the data, the tools and the technology handed to them on a platter by someone else, which improved the reliability of their network asset.

This is an example of simple, effective and rapid collaboration with real benefits that spread across the entire value chain.
IIRC, the UK (G83) limits are 207 - 264V and 47 - 50.5Hz, solar PV as a percentage of generation is a fraction of Hawaii's, and few (if any) inverters can be updated remotely over the power line.

Still, an interesting development. :)
User avatar
BritDownUnder
Posts: 2481
Joined: 21 Sep 2011, 12:02
Location: Hunter Valley, NSW, Australia

Post by BritDownUnder »

'Remote reprogramming' worries me. Makes things susceptible to hacker attacks.

Hawaii's grid (or Grids as I suspect each island is isolated) is one of the least sustainable in the world using expensive fuel oil and coal, all imported. Solar is definitely the way forward and they should be commended for that. With great mountains the potential for pumped storage is there too. From time to time OTEC also gets mentioned.

A while back on the oil drum someone said they would like to move to the Big Island and there were quite a few responses saying how unsustainable such a move would be having to import everything from miles away.
G'Day cobber!
Post Reply