Atlantic Array scuppered

Can Wind Power meet the energy needs of Britain in the 21st century or is it just a lot of overblown hype?

Moderator: Peak Moderation

Post Reply
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Atlantic Array scuppered

Post by biffvernon »

Stupid government: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/ ... ne-project
Britain's green ambitions have been dealt a blow as a big six energy company has pulled the plug on one of the world's largest offshore windfarms, with the political storm enveloping the industry threatening the multibillion-pound investments needed to meet emissions targets and head off a looming capacity crunch.

Weeks after warning that the government was treating environmental subsidies as a "political football", the German-owned RWE npower is pulling out of the £4bn Atlantic Array project in the Bristol Channel because the economics do not stack up.
User avatar
adam2
Site Admin
Posts: 11013
Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis

Post by adam2 »

When the lights go out, for want of natural gas to generate electricity then I will qoute this descision and say "what a victory for the NIMBYS"

Wind power helps very considerably with the somewhat perilous natural gas supply situation. Every GWH from wind is less electricity to be generated from other sources, typicly gas.

The pro/anti wind power arguments foccus largely on the cost per KWH of wind power compared to other sources. They ignore the fact that more wind power reduces the need for extra, and very expensive, natural gas storage.

If we had twice the present wind power capacity, that would largely eliminate gas burning for baseload electricity generation.
Gas would still be burnt for peak demand and calm weather, but not for baseload.
Our existing gas storage would then last for longer in the event of supply disruptions.
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin
Posts: 14287
Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Contact:

Post by kenneal - lagger »

We don't need wind power now that we have new nukes and fracking on the way. And they come with free ionising radiation and ground water pollution to add to GDP with the clean up costs.

Power and added GDP!! What more could you ask for?
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
User avatar
RenewableCandy
Posts: 12780
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
Location: York

Post by RenewableCandy »

Call me an optimistic Physicist but my guess is that RWE are waiting to see if the floating-turbine thing's a goer, and then if it is will redesign Atlantic with floating turbines 'cause it'll be cheaper. Oh and did anyone else notice the associated phrase A Raft Of Measures? :D

NPower built the 1st-ever offshore array (North Hoyle) and got their fingers burned in the process, so perhaps they're kind-of cautious now.
Soyez réaliste. Demandez l'impossible.
Stories
The Price of Time
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

Argyll Array cancelled.

(UK gives up on future.)
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin
Posts: 14287
Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Contact:

Post by kenneal - lagger »

A lot of this is to put political and economic pressure on the government over subsidies. If future nukes can double the current price of electricity and get guaranteed usage then why not wind!
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
Post Reply