So why is this idea bonkers?
http://vortexbladeless.com/home.php
http://grist.org/news/this-wind-turbine ... ts-better/
Vortex Bladeless
Moderator: Peak Moderation
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14823
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
Re: Vortex Bladeless
I don't know, so why is this idea bonkers?biffvernon wrote:So why is this idea bonkers?
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
I have no idea if it will work efficiently or be cost effective, but the basic concept is sound enough.
The idea is to be cheaper and have a lower visual and noise impact than a conventional turbine, using an oscillating or flapping mast (it flaps for the same reason flags flap) to power an induction coil to generate electricity.
It is less efficient overall at extracting energy from the wind, and I suspect it will generate a fair amount of heat which will need to be dissipated.
I can imagine NIMBYs taking one look at a wobbly mast and immediately calling it even more of an eyesore and source of mysterious disease than a turbine.
It may not work, but it might be a revolutionary design. Worth a punt, probably better odds than a lottery ticket.
techy bit
http://vortexbladeless.com/blog.php
the only photo I can find
http://vortexbladeless.com/gestor/uploa ... 366271.jpg
I can't see this scaling to the multi-megawatt scale. More an on-shore option where visual impact is a problem.
The idea is to be cheaper and have a lower visual and noise impact than a conventional turbine, using an oscillating or flapping mast (it flaps for the same reason flags flap) to power an induction coil to generate electricity.
It is less efficient overall at extracting energy from the wind, and I suspect it will generate a fair amount of heat which will need to be dissipated.
I can imagine NIMBYs taking one look at a wobbly mast and immediately calling it even more of an eyesore and source of mysterious disease than a turbine.
It may not work, but it might be a revolutionary design. Worth a punt, probably better odds than a lottery ticket.
techy bit
http://vortexbladeless.com/blog.php
the only photo I can find
http://vortexbladeless.com/gestor/uploa ... 366271.jpg
I can't see this scaling to the multi-megawatt scale. More an on-shore option where visual impact is a problem.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14287
- Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
- Location: Newbury, Berkshire
- Contact:
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact: