"Wind Lenses" could triple the output of a turbine
Moderator: Peak Moderation
"Wind Lenses" could triple the output of a turbine
This looks promising: Japanese breakthrough will make wind power cheaper than nuclear
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14815
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
- UndercoverElephant
- Posts: 13496
- Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
- Location: UK
Re: "Wind Lenses" could triple the output of a tur
I can't understand why nobody has figured this out before now.murpen wrote:This looks promising: Japanese breakthrough will make wind power cheaper than nuclear
"We fail to mandate economic sanity because our brains are addled by....compassion." (Garrett Hardin)
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14815
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
Re: "Wind Lenses" could triple the output of a tur
Maybe they have and it's not worth it? We need better information.UndercoverElephant wrote:I can't understand why nobody has figured this out before now.murpen wrote:This looks promising: Japanese breakthrough will make wind power cheaper than nuclear
Anyone on here with a small turbine could try it out and let us know what happens.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
Re: "Wind Lenses" could triple the output of a tur
The best ideas are ones that seem obvious in hindsight.UndercoverElephant wrote:I can't understand why nobody has figured this out before now.
wind lens
Brilliant! This principle (a low pressure zone created by an aerofoil or diffuser) is what gives aeroplane wings lift. Low pressure also allows venturis to draw liquids or gases through holes.
I wonder how the NIMBYs will take to the new look
ujoni08
I wonder how the NIMBYs will take to the new look
ujoni08
I see the solway windfarm every day, and while indvidual turbines look great, the pattern they create from the shore do make the view an eye-shore. And I have to say, these look like monstrosities.
Anway, won't placing a load of these on agricultural land simply be the same as bio-fuel, taking away land useful for food. And would such number of turbines not create temperature differences on a larger scale than what wind farms do now, and so influence climate change?
We don't need just more information, we need An Inspector Calls.
Anway, won't placing a load of these on agricultural land simply be the same as bio-fuel, taking away land useful for food. And would such number of turbines not create temperature differences on a larger scale than what wind farms do now, and so influence climate change?
Maybe they have and it's not worth it? We need better information.
We don't need just more information, we need An Inspector Calls.
wind lens
As I understand it, the trick is in the flared surround. Wind flows through the centre, and spins the turbine as normal, but wind that flows over the surround is forced to take a longer route, and when it goes past the edge of the surround, it causes an area of low pressure behind the turbine. That low pressure draws wind through the centre faster than the actual wind speed, spinning the turbine faster and generating more power than a standard turbine.
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14815
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
And you need a smack.Snail wrote:Maybe they have and it's not worth it? We need better information.
We don't need just more information, we need An Inspector Calls.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14290
- Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
- Location: Newbury, Berkshire
- Contact:
But aero dynamics does. As Jon says, it's the same principle as the aircraft wing or even lorries driving close behind each other on the motorway. The vortices behind the front lorry create a low pressure zone which draws the vehicle behind along with it using less fuel, slipstreaming. I've never worked out or seen anything about whether the first lorry uses more fuel though.Snail wrote:Thanks ujoni08 for explaining. I didn't understand how it increases the energy so much, it seems too much like getting a free lunch from nothing. Something thermodynamics doesn't allow.
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
They're converting them to be ducted turbines. The same concepts already exist for hydro turbines: compare non ducted tidal turbines such as Stranford Lough to ducted turbines such as Kaplans or Francis. But I wonder what the duct length to blade diameter ratio has got to be?
http://oxfordoceanics.co.uk/ewtec.pdf
http://www.wind-works.org/SmallTurbines ... bines.html
http://oxfordoceanics.co.uk/ewtec.pdf
http://www.wind-works.org/SmallTurbines ... bines.html
No, all you have to do is feather the blades, just as you do with a conventional windmill.
The difficulties with this idea are
The difficulties with this idea are
- difficulty of constructing the duct,
requirement for larger base construction (unless the duct arrangement can be perched on top of a windmill tower),
large increase in capital cost - at least double I would think,
turning the machine into wind will require more power, again increasing capital and revenue costs.