G-Wiz! Electric car goes up in smoke

Our transport is heavily oil-based. What are the alternatives?

Moderator: Peak Moderation

Post Reply
Aurora

G-Wiz! Electric car goes up in smoke

Post by Aurora »

http://environment.independent.co.uk/gr ... 124266.ece

Image
The Independent - 03/11/07

The electric car's potential for saving the planet by reducing our dependence on oil and lowering carbon emissions has been dealt a blow with the news that a best-selling model may suddenly burst into flames.

A total of 629 G-Wiz cars ? about two-thirds of the number on Britain's roads ? have been recalled and repaired because their battery chargers may be prone to overheating. The alarm was raised when a parked car spontaneously combusted.

No one was hurt and, although just one car was involved in the incident in August, the Reva Electric Car Company decided to recall every G-Wiz fitted with the same charger.

Publicity about the recalls could stunt the growing popularity of the Indian-made three-door hatchback, which can be charged from a normal power socket and costs just 1p a mile to run. Its British retailer, GoinGreen, offsets the car's manufacture and use, allowing it to claim that the vehicle is completely "carbon neutral".

The 8ft-long G-Wiz, which costs ?7,299, is far smaller than conventional cars and emits only two-thirds of the carbon dioxide produced by a similar, petrol-driven vehicle. It is exempted from road tax because of its environmental credentials, it is not subject to the ?8-a-day congestion charge in London and can also be parked free in some areas. As a result, the car has proved a hit with hundreds of drivers in the capital, where most of the cars have been sold.

Several celebrities are G-Wiz owners, including Jonathan Ross, Jerry Hall and Kristin Scott Thomas, who said: "I love my G-Wiz. It is such fun to drive, easy to park, nippy. Children laugh when I pass by."

However, the car's reputation was dented in May when safety tests organised by BBC's Top Gear programme suggested that the G-Wiz offered poor protection in a crash and occupants could potentially receive fatal injuries at speeds of 40mph.

GoinGreen acknowledged that the G-Wiz was likely to perform worse than heavier cars in crash tests but pointed out that its lightness prevented pedestrians from being hurt as badly in any collision. In any case, it added, the G-Wiz had a top speed of 45mph and was designed for urban traffic where the likelihood of a high-speed impact was lower. The recall was announced in September and ended this week. The cars were collected and taken to GoinGreen's workshop in Southall, west London, where battery chargers containing faulty heat sensors were replaced with heat-sensitive cut-out switches and fire-retardant covers. The company's managing director, Keith Johnston, said: "The recall was undertaken as a precautionary measure following a single failure, where no one was injured. GoinGreen supports the action, which demonstrates the highest level of commitment to safety in electric vehicles."

The company pointed out that 275 other makes of car had been recalled by manufacturers this year, affecting hundreds of thousands of vehicles.

Mr Johnston also claimed that the G-Wiz was being unfairly singled out by what he called "a few petrolhead motoring journalists".
User avatar
Andy Hunt
Posts: 6760
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Bury, Lancashire, UK

Post by Andy Hunt »

Joking or otherwise, certain said journalists could end up looking like a right bunch of t**** in the event of a petrol shortage.

And they claim to be looking after the interests of the "consumer" . . . ? So why weren't we warned?

I can see it now . . .

"Went out and bought a ?90K Jag on your recommend Jeremy, and now I can't drive the thing."

So who's going to pay for that little 'error of judgement'? Not Jeremy f****** Clarkson I bet!

:twisted:
Andy Hunt
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
Eternal Sunshine wrote: I wouldn't want to worry you with the truth. :roll:
Aurora

Post by Aurora »

Jeremy Clarkson, Richard Hammond and James May?

Don't get me started. :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
User avatar
RenewableCandy
Posts: 12780
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
Location: York

Post by RenewableCandy »

D'you think that was a put-up job (can't think exactly HOW, mind, but the ingenuity of The Establishment knows no bounds, e.g. acid in Castro's inhaler etc...)? I mean, if Londoners and other assorted characters aren't using oil-product-guzzling vehicles, the whole of the economy could go up in smoke...
User avatar
jonny2mad
Posts: 2452
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: weston super mare

Post by jonny2mad »

my sister had a automatic car and one day she got in it and they thing went into reverse destroyed a 4x4 after crossing a road , then went into forward gear and caused structural damage to a council building anyway apparently automatics just do that sometimes go haywire .

The police didnt seem that suprised didnt try to say she had done it on purpose
gug
Posts: 469
Joined: 08 Jan 2007, 15:53

Post by gug »

jonny2mad wrote:my sister had a automatic car and one day she got in it and they thing went into reverse destroyed a 4x4 after crossing a road , then went into forward gear and caused structural damage to a council building anyway apparently automatics just do that sometimes go haywire .
So, whilst I'm hoping that your sister wasn't injured, her car destroyed a 4x4 and then had a go at the local council.

I'm failing to see much downside to this story :)
gug
Posts: 469
Joined: 08 Jan 2007, 15:53

Post by gug »

This thread actually reminds me that yesterday, me and mrs Gug got on our bikes and rode a couple of miles to a country pub for lunch.

In the carpark was a gathering of thirtysomethings admiring their collection of japanese looking sports cars (wide wheels, chrome + fins etc) and I couldn't help thinking that they were all going to be the proud owners of some extremely expensive paperweights in a few years time.
User avatar
RenewableCandy
Posts: 12780
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
Location: York

Post by RenewableCandy »

gug wrote:This thread actually reminds me that yesterday, me and mrs Gug got on our bikes and rode a couple of miles to a country pub for lunch.

In the carpark was a gathering of thirtysomethings admiring their collection of japanese looking sports cars (wide wheels, chrome + fins etc) and I couldn't help thinking that they were all going to be the proud owners of some extremely expensive paperweights in a few years time.
I bet you 2 are fitter than them and all!
Vortex
Posts: 6095
Joined: 16 May 2006, 19:14

Post by Vortex »

jonny2mad wrote:my sister had a automatic car and one day she got in it and they thing went into reverse destroyed a 4x4 after crossing a road , then went into forward gear and caused structural damage to a council building anyway apparently automatics just do that sometimes go haywire .

The police didnt seem that suprised didnt try to say she had done it on purpose
Was it an automatic Volvo 3-series ftited with the lethal rubber-band gearbox?
Post Reply