Petrol is too cheap + Using the Hard Shoulder

Our transport is heavily oil-based. What are the alternatives?

Moderator: Peak Moderation

Post Reply
User avatar
Bandidoz
Site Admin
Posts: 2705
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Berks

Petrol is too cheap + Using the Hard Shoulder

Post by Bandidoz »

....because there's more and more cars on the roads!!

http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=1096

Image

Quite an interesting idea has evolved on the use of hard shoulders to cope with greater traffic capacity on motorways - although it's probably to save money, I wonder if any "Peak Oil" thought has gone into avoiding widening the motorways....

http://www.highways.gov.uk/knowledge/1361.aspx

Image
Olduvai Theory (Updated) (Reviewed)
Easter Island - a warning from history : http://dieoff.org/page145.htm
User avatar
WolfattheDoor
Posts: 318
Joined: 10 Jan 2006, 13:19
Location: Devon
Contact:

Post by WolfattheDoor »

Another example of the government taking the easiest way out.

The real way to solve congestion would be to get more people onto public transport by subsidy and increased driving costs, and to reduce the amount of commuting we do. That would be unpopular, difficult and expensive.

Building more roads, which is what using the hard shoulder is effectively doing, reduces congestion in the short term but increases it in the long term.

Like nuclear power instead of renewables/energy reduction, it is taking the easy way out of solving the real problems.
www.wolfatthedoor.org.uk
Alerting the world to the dangers of peak oil
User avatar
isenhand
Posts: 1296
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by isenhand »

WolfattheDoor wrote:
Like nuclear power instead of renewables/energy reduction, it is taking the easy way out of solving the real problems.
Or not fixing the problem at all, just patching up the facade

:)
The only future we have is the one we make!

Technocracy:
http://en.technocracynet.eu

http://www.lulu.com/technocracy

http://www.technocracy.tk/
snow hope
Posts: 4101
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: outside Belfast, N Ireland

Post by snow hope »

Crikey, we will need some incredible levels of energy reduction and renewable energy production to solve the problems of our electricity requirements! I think we will need all hands to deck including as much nuclear as we can get. That's being realistic in my opinion.
Real money is gold and silver
User avatar
isenhand
Posts: 1296
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by isenhand »

snow hope wrote:Crikey, we will need some incredible levels of energy reduction and renewable energy production to solve the problems of our electricity requirements! I think we will need all hands to deck including as much nuclear as we can get. That's being realistic in my opinion.

We do have quite a lot of waste in our current system so we do have plenty of possibilities to reduce our consumption and still maintain a high standard of living but I don?t believe we can do that with our current socioeconomic system.

:)
The only future we have is the one we make!

Technocracy:
http://en.technocracynet.eu

http://www.lulu.com/technocracy

http://www.technocracy.tk/
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin
Posts: 14287
Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Contact:

Post by kenneal - lagger »

The problem with nuclear, Snow Hope, is that when we come to decommission the new nuclear power stations in 40 or 50 years time, we may not have enough energy to do it. Then we'll be left with umpteen nukes festering around the country for 100,000 years or so.
Post Reply