Honda's fuel-cell future is a quieter one

Our transport is heavily oil-based. What are the alternatives?

Moderator: Peak Moderation

Post Reply
Aurora

Honda's fuel-cell future is a quieter one

Post by Aurora »

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/mai ... nhon07.xml

Image
Telegraph.co.uk - 07/07/07

Honda has significantly reduced the noise produced by its fuel-cell powered FCX Concept car prior to a production sign-off and the car being made commercially available next year, writes Andrew English

The whining noise is produced by the air compressor, which forces air into the fuel-cell stack, where it acts on a platinum catalyst with hydrogen to produce electricity.

Honda uses a screw-type compressor rather than the quieter, but less efficient, electrical turbocharger systems of the Daimler Chrysler Hygenius and General Motors Sequel fuel-cell rivals.

Honda claims the FCX Concept sounds noisier than the old FCX fuel-cell car because the compressor is nearer to the passengers and because the raked windscreen radiates noise into the cabin. Production versions should be even quieter as their bodyshells will be made of steel instead of the stiff-but-noisy carbon-fibre of the early versions we drove last year and again last week. Chief fuel-cell engineer Sachito Fujimoto says: "The work we are doing on noise is one of the most confidential parts of the entire project, so I can say no more than that we have been working on the pump intake and exhaust." Despite the recent adoption of lithium-ion battery technology by companies like General Motors, with its Volt hybrid concept car, Honda remains committed to a fuel-cell future. "I believe the fuel-cell is the ultimate propulsion system," says Fujimoto, "and that one day it will replace all internal combustion engines." The FCX Concept will only be leased in America and Japan, where there are enough hydrogen refuelling sites to make it a practical proposition. Honda currently has 31 old-model FCX cars on $500-a-month lease arrangements.

A name for the new, improved car is still under debate.
User avatar
adam2
Site Admin
Posts: 11014
Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis

Post by adam2 »

Yes I know that it is very clever, but is there any point ?

From where do they propose to obtain the hydrogen ? I am aware of only two ways of producing hydrogen on a large scale.

Firstly by chemical treatment of natural gas; the process wastes up to half the energy content of the natural gas. If natural gas is to be used for transport it would be much simpler to use natural gas in a modified petrol engine (which could also burn ordinary petrol in the event that NG was not available)

Alternativly hydrogen can be made by the electrolysis of water. This requires a great deal of electricity. If this electricity is obtained from natural gas, as is often the case, then the idea is pointless, better to use the gas directly as above. If the electricity is from renewable sources, then the idea may have some merit, though the costs and complications would be huge. Probably better to use the renewable electricity to charge electric vehicles thus eliminating to costs, hazards and losses of hydrogen production, storage and distribution.
User avatar
mikepepler
Site Admin
Posts: 3096
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Rye, UK
Contact:

Post by mikepepler »

I'm so glad they've made the car quieter, that's the last problem solved then isn't it. Let's all go out and buy one. :twisted:
Post Reply