You think IQ tests have something to do with education?jonny2mad wrote:Well why bother with education, why test doctors, surely it would be nicer if anyone who wants to be a doctor or a engineer would just be given a piece of paper saying you are now a doctor or engineer.
Surely that would mean less hurt feelings.
Seven billion and counting
Moderator: Peak Moderation
-
- Posts: 235
- Joined: 22 Jan 2006, 10:20
I think if you have a population with very low IQ your less likely to be able to produce many brain surgeons .
So far people have said things like well maybe this group have low IQ scores but they sing well or they have intuition not logical thinking, well I think for some things you need logical thinking .
Even with the study that biff sent me to, their estimate for sub Saharan Africa had a average IQ of 82, we would class that as borderline mental functioning, a IQ of 59 would be mild mental retardation and remember thats the average for the country .
Well if someone came to me and said I have this country or continent, its falling to pieces their all starving and they mentioned that the average person in the country had learning difficulty's I'd consider that may be part of the reason why.
So far people have said things like well maybe this group have low IQ scores but they sing well or they have intuition not logical thinking, well I think for some things you need logical thinking .
Even with the study that biff sent me to, their estimate for sub Saharan Africa had a average IQ of 82, we would class that as borderline mental functioning, a IQ of 59 would be mild mental retardation and remember thats the average for the country .
Well if someone came to me and said I have this country or continent, its falling to pieces their all starving and they mentioned that the average person in the country had learning difficulty's I'd consider that may be part of the reason why.
"What causes more suffering in the world than the stupidity of the compassionate?"Friedrich Nietzsche
optimism is cowardice oswald spengler
optimism is cowardice oswald spengler
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 235
- Joined: 22 Jan 2006, 10:20
-
- Posts: 235
- Joined: 22 Jan 2006, 10:20
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
No, it should have been a comma.
See: http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/dep ... ode17.html
(I'm not sure that this source can be entirely trusted; he used 'which' instead of 'that' in this line:
See: http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/dep ... ode17.html
(I'm not sure that this source can be entirely trusted; he used 'which' instead of 'that' in this line:
Fowler would have disapproved.)(2) There is no connecting word which would require a comma, such as and or but;
Last edited by Kieran on 25 Oct 2011, 23:10, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 235
- Joined: 22 Jan 2006, 10:20
biffvernon wrote:No, it should have been a comma.
See: http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/dep ... ode17.html
(I'm not sure that this source can be entirely trusted; he used 'which' instead of 'that' in this line:Fowler would have disapproved.)(2) There is no connecting word which would require a comma, such as and or but;
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
Ah, now that should have had a semicolon as it joins two complete sentences into a single written sentence, thus:alternative-energy wrote:
In a bit, watchin Newsnight.
In a bit; watchin Newsnight.
Of course claiming that 'In a bit' and 'watchin Newsnight' are complete sentences is pushing things, but had you written 'I will answer your question in a bit' and 'I am watching Newsnight at present' then the point would be better, though more verbosely, made.
[/coat]
-
- Posts: 235
- Joined: 22 Jan 2006, 10:20
-
- Posts: 235
- Joined: 22 Jan 2006, 10:20
Why didn't Europeans invent the boomerang?jonny2mad wrote:Why didn't the aborigines invent the wheel?
Because they didn't run out of stones.why were they still in the stone age when discovered by the rest of the world ,
There's a huge difference in levels of development between North and South Korea; bugger all genetic difference between North and South Koreans.could average IQ have something to do with the levels of development in Asia and europe and in Africa .
We've had a few threads here, where I've already said most of what I want to say. Lynn's research is of very poor quality. I don't expect anyone on opposing sides of the argument to change their views though.Anyway I'm interested in peoples reaction to this research but its a very contentious issue, on latoc we had a thread on race and IQ and it just produced bad feeling
Well traditionally all things being equal it would be to your advantage to be able to think clearly in a logical way .
Imagine two tribes in competition, they both work hard and try to survive, but one tribe is twice as smart as the other tribe, I'd think that tribe would be more likely to win in the competition .
Its a bit like choosing a football team, you would chose anyone because everyone has equal worth and you don't want to have people who feel left out , I'd try to choose the best footballers, I think my team would be more likely to win .
Humans have always been in competition with other humans for resources, they have also had to deal with very difficult environments , to make the tribe stronger they have done things like kill the disabled and the old, this was common practice in many or most tribal society's .
You are a product of those society's , life is harsh and yes I would prefer to be in a society with lots of smart people, I would be concerned if my tribe was getting dumber by the year .
Lets imagine your in the imaginary football team, but instead of it just being a game it was a matter of your survival, would you prefer to be in a team that couldn't run or see the ball, would you think that would increase your chances of survival
Imagine two tribes in competition, they both work hard and try to survive, but one tribe is twice as smart as the other tribe, I'd think that tribe would be more likely to win in the competition .
Its a bit like choosing a football team, you would chose anyone because everyone has equal worth and you don't want to have people who feel left out , I'd try to choose the best footballers, I think my team would be more likely to win .
Humans have always been in competition with other humans for resources, they have also had to deal with very difficult environments , to make the tribe stronger they have done things like kill the disabled and the old, this was common practice in many or most tribal society's .
You are a product of those society's , life is harsh and yes I would prefer to be in a society with lots of smart people, I would be concerned if my tribe was getting dumber by the year .
Lets imagine your in the imaginary football team, but instead of it just being a game it was a matter of your survival, would you prefer to be in a team that couldn't run or see the ball, would you think that would increase your chances of survival
"What causes more suffering in the world than the stupidity of the compassionate?"Friedrich Nietzsche
optimism is cowardice oswald spengler
optimism is cowardice oswald spengler
yup roguemale its one of the most contentious areas to debate this so reminds me of the latoc thread I'm not really sure how we got here I think it may have been me telling smart people go have more children
"What causes more suffering in the world than the stupidity of the compassionate?"Friedrich Nietzsche
optimism is cowardice oswald spengler
optimism is cowardice oswald spengler