Ukraine Watch...

Discussion of the latest Peak Oil news (please also check the Website News area below)

Moderator: Peak Moderation

User avatar
UndercoverElephant
Posts: 13626
Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
Location: UK

Re: Ukraine Watch...

Post by UndercoverElephant »

Potemkin Villager wrote: 20 Feb 2025, 19:12
UndercoverElephant wrote: 20 Feb 2025, 12:42
But the hot air is already having massive consequences. NATO may already be damaged beyond repair. The fault line described above will not go away. Indeed, it isn't a new fault line -- it is basically the same fault line that first emerged during the American Civil War. Dixie is back, and she's mad as hell.
This fine bit of rhetorical, "profit of doom" hyperbole and fine turns of phrase is supported by precisely zero evidence!
What are these "massive" consequences. (My alarm bells always ring when folk describe something as
massive rather than large or even significant.)

As for the use of "may" above you could indeed say that hell may freeze over tomorrow or indeed that NATO
may indeed be damaged to an extent from which it will quite probably recover!
For NATO to work, Article 5 has to be believed. It must be taken seriously by everybody, inside and outside of NATO. Trump's actions have undermined this in a way that is impossible to fix. Once trust like that has gone, then it is gone.
We must deal with reality or it will deal with us.
User avatar
UndercoverElephant
Posts: 13626
Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
Location: UK

Re: Ukraine Watch...

Post by UndercoverElephant »

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ceqjn74gdwzo
Trump 'very frustrated' and Zelensky must strike minerals deal, says adviser
Give me your minerals or....or....erm, I already seem to have bargained away everything I had to offer you...

What an extra-ordinary situation. How does this end when Trump finally realises he's not going to get most of the things he wants? This "deal" is for support already provided. He's demanding retrospective payment for what was freely given, and offering nothing going forwards. Why would anybody in their right mind accept this deal?

"Hey, I know what... I'm going to offer him a deal he cannot refuse!"

Literally, this is the direct equivalent of a mafia protection racket.
We must deal with reality or it will deal with us.
Ralphw2
Posts: 632
Joined: 05 Jul 2023, 21:18

Re: Ukraine Watch...

Post by Ralphw2 »

Rumours that Trump is planning to withdraw all US troops from bases in eastern Europe. Reported in a German newspaper.

On current form, this is 100% believable.

Also reported that Putin has offered Trump chances for major trade deals to develop new oil and gas fields, in regions where Russia does not have the technology or manpower to work in the arctic conditions. In exchange for ALL of his Russia's conditions for ceasefire in Ukraine (Full Ukrainian capitulation).

China is looking more and more like the best of a bad lot.
User avatar
mr brightside
Posts: 630
Joined: 01 Apr 2011, 08:02
Location: On the fells

Re: Ukraine Watch...

Post by mr brightside »

Ralphw2 wrote: 21 Feb 2025, 04:14 Also reported that Putin has offered Trump chances for major trade deals to develop new oil and gas fields, in regions where Russia does not have the technology or manpower to work in the arctic conditions.
I suspected there might be a deal to be done, see what pans out then.
Persistence of habitat, is the fundamental basis of persistence of a species.
User avatar
BritDownUnder
Posts: 2607
Joined: 21 Sep 2011, 12:02
Location: Hunter Valley, NSW, Australia

Re: Ukraine Watch...

Post by BritDownUnder »

UndercoverElephant wrote: 20 Feb 2025, 22:15
Give me your minerals or....or....erm, I already seem to have bargained away everything I had to offer you...
Yes they have not been to bargaining school. Telling Russia that the Trump administration does not want NATO membership for Ukraine before the start of negotiations was probably not a good opening gambit. Russia probably thinks it is Christmas. The lack of nous and almost childlike approach to getting their own way is telling.

On another note there was and article about the UK not having tactical nukes but the head of BAE saying that it was possible. The article went on to propose that the UK manufacture tactical nukes and possibly 'lend' them to other NATO members. I hope Australia gets some also. We can actually pay you for them.

Mind you the UK could not muster a single division of infantry and apparently there are more admirals than warships. The Royal Navy could not mount another Falklands mission these days with the same number of ships. The current ships my fare better than the 1980s era ships in terms of air defence perhaps.
G'Day cobber!
Post Reply