Brexit process

Discussion of the latest Peak Oil news (please also check the Website News area below)

Moderator: Peak Moderation

User avatar
Mark
Posts: 2603
Joined: 13 Dec 2007, 08:48
Location: NW England

Post by Mark »

stumuz1 wrote:
Mark wrote:
I remember you posting a countdown clock to the March 'deadline', quoting primary legislation etc.
Brexit minus 10 days, Brexit minus 9 days etc.
You then went very quiet for a few months.
And I was right!

Did not think the premier would bottle and grovel
Were you ?
We didn't default to Hard Brexit in March
You're now confident that BoJo (majority of 1) won't do similar to TM ?
stumuz1
Posts: 901
Joined: 07 Jun 2016, 22:12
Location: Anglesey

Post by stumuz1 »

Well as confident as a divided nation can be.

Bojo has one shot at a successful premiership.

Take the poison of Brexit out of the system by leaving. Then allow the remainers a vote on rejoining the EU by voting Libdem.

This will be cathartic. The vote will have been respected. Democracy functioning again.

But, no. I don't think Bojo will bottle and grovel.
User avatar
Lord Beria3
Posts: 5066
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 20:57
Location: Moscow Russia
Contact:

Post by Lord Beria3 »

Agreed.

Hopefully will be out by 31st Oct.

I will be dancing on the streets!
Peace always has been and always will be an intermittent flash of light in a dark history of warfare, violence, and destruction
RevdTess
Posts: 3054
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Glasgow

Post by RevdTess »

Lord Beria3 wrote:Eurointeligence latest...
I don't usually agree with Eurointelligence, at least not in entirety, but I think they're spot on with this one.

A lot rides on the procedure for selecting a new govt-of-national-unity after failing a confidence vote. I have no idea how this would work. Say Boris loses his two confidence votes and the govt has to resign. Boris goes to the Queen and requests an election date, oooh, I don't know, November 1st. At what point does Her Majesty go "Actually we should ask Dominic Grieve if he can do the job" ? How does parliament even choose someone to go to the Queen and ask to try to form a govt? And why would Corbyn support them if that leader isn't him? He'd surely prefer a GE at any point regardless of the implied Brexit outcome. I don't know what he think he'll achieve with 20% vote vs the Tories' 35%+ bounce from getting Brexit done and the end of the Brexit Party.... Well, anyway, I'd be quite surprised if someone manages to pull off a national unity govt including Corbyn, the SNP, LibDems, Green, all the independents etc before October 31st.

The easier route must surely be to make a new law that forces the PM to revoke A50 before October 31st if a new deal has not been agreed in the meantime. That doesn't mean A50 can't be restarted, especially after a new mandate from a GE. Of course that would be disastrous for the Tories who would be seen to have failed, and the BXP would no doubt do extremely well in subsequent elections. Labour would however also lose massively since to vote to revoke A50 outright in the case of no deal would also go against their promises. This is why Eurointelligence are probably right to say that voting to revoke A50 is extremely unlikely. But I still think it's more likely than a VonC preventing the govt exiting with no deal on October 31st.

I'm personally pretty sanguine about a no deal exit. I still think leaving the EU is a tragedy for the country, and I still don't see any evidence that the EU are the undemocratic corrupt evil that many Brexiteers insist, and I'd still prefer EU governance to UK parliament governance if I'm honest. The difference between listening to EU commission leaders and listening to the UK govt is like the difference between listening to Barack Obama vs Donald Trump after any national tragedy.

But if we have to leave (and I really think the country has changed its mind on this, but here we are anyway), then better to start from scratch and negotiate our way back in to what we want, and even better to have a nauseating Tory/DUP/BXP government to blame any failures on. Of course 'what we want' may depend hugely on a November election which I think Corbyn would be stupid to demand.
cubes
Posts: 725
Joined: 10 Jun 2008, 21:40
Location: Norfolk

Post by cubes »

Lord Beria3 wrote:Agreed.

Hopefully will be out by 31st Oct.

I will be dancing on the streets!
And 5 years down the line you'll be regretting you ever supported it.
User avatar
Lord Beria3
Posts: 5066
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 20:57
Location: Moscow Russia
Contact:

Post by Lord Beria3 »

Nope - I'm a Greerist and will remain a Brexiteer.

The EU is finished long-term.

Greer has written that trade deals with the Commonwealth will happen once we leave the EU which will be good news for the UK.

https://business.financialpost.com/opin ... atching-on

This is an interesting post on that subject.
Peace always has been and always will be an intermittent flash of light in a dark history of warfare, violence, and destruction
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin
Posts: 14287
Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Contact:

Post by kenneal - lagger »

cubes wrote:
Lord Beria3 wrote:Agreed.

Hopefully will be out by 31st Oct.

I will be dancing on the streets!
And 5 years down the line you'll be regretting you ever supported it.
Five years down the line we are more likely to see the Euro defunct and the EU on the ropes as a consequence and LB3 and other Leavers dancing in the streets because we got out in time. Remainers will probably still be moaning that we left even as the rotten institution collapses!
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin
Posts: 14287
Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Contact:

Post by kenneal - lagger »

Lord Beria3 wrote:Nope - I'm a Greerist and will remain a Brexiteer.

The EU is finished long-term.

Greer has written that trade deals with the Commonwealth will happen once we leave the EU which will be good news for the UK.

https://business.financialpost.com/opin ... atching-on

This is an interesting post on that subject.
CANZUK does have great appeal except that Australia has a pretty nutty right wing government at the moment and Canada has had same in recent years.
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
User avatar
UndercoverElephant
Posts: 13648
Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
Location: UK

Post by UndercoverElephant »

RevdTess wrote:
Lord Beria3 wrote:Eurointeligence latest...
I don't usually agree with Eurointelligence, at least not in entirety, but I think they're spot on with this one.

A lot rides on the procedure for selecting a new govt-of-national-unity after failing a confidence vote. I have no idea how this would work. Say Boris loses his two confidence votes and the govt has to resign. Boris goes to the Queen and requests an election date, oooh, I don't know, November 1st.
That's not how it works. When he loses the VonC, parliament has 14 days to try to find a new government. Boris doesn't go to the Queen to request an election unless those 14 days pass without a new government emerging.
How does parliament even choose someone to go to the Queen and ask to try to form a govt?
Intra-opposition horse trading and brinkmanship, behind closed doors
And why would Corbyn support them if that leader isn't him?
Because he gets to fight an election.
He'd surely prefer a GE at any point regardless of the implied Brexit outcome.
So why wouldn't he back a government of national unity whose only remit is to ask for an extension and call an election?
I don't know what he think he'll achieve with 20% vote vs the Tories' 35%+ bounce from getting Brexit done and the end of the Brexit Party....
It will happen before brexit.
Well, anyway, I'd be quite surprised if someone manages to pull off a national unity govt including Corbyn, the SNP, LibDems, Green, all the independents etc before October 31st.
I'll be astonished if it doesn't.
The easier route must surely be to make a new law that forces the PM to revoke A50 before October 31st if a new deal has not been agreed in the meantime.
That's actually much harder. It is too complicated and risky.
User avatar
UndercoverElephant
Posts: 13648
Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
Location: UK

Post by UndercoverElephant »

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/politics/ ... gh-brexit/
BORIS Johnson would REFUSE to quit if he lost a no-confidence vote in a desperate bid to force through Brexit.

The determined Prime Minister has plans to ignore any potential challenge by Tory rebels and Remainer MPs before October 31.
That would be very much a consitutional crisis, of the highest order.
If Boris refuses to resign, the Queen may be called to get involved in the matter.
There is no bigger constitutional crisis possible under the UK system. For the tory brexiteers, this is now a fight to the death, and they could take the monarchy down with them.
User avatar
adam2
Site Admin
Posts: 11059
Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis

Post by adam2 »

I cant imagine the Queen becoming involved.
By long tradition our sovereign does not get involved in politics, tradition can of course be dispensed with in truly exceptional circumstances, but I feel that Brexit arguments are a long way from needing Royal involvement.
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
User avatar
UndercoverElephant
Posts: 13648
Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
Location: UK

Post by UndercoverElephant »

adam2 wrote:I cant imagine the Queen becoming involved.
Can you image Johnson losing a confidence vote and refusing to resign?
User avatar
UndercoverElephant
Posts: 13648
Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
Location: UK

Post by UndercoverElephant »

RevdTess wrote: How does parliament even choose someone to go to the Queen and ask to try to form a govt?
Horsetrading.

From tomorrow's Times:
Labour and the SNP moved towards a pact last night that would seek to oust Boris Johnson as the parties prepared for an autumn election.

John McDonnell, the shadow chancellor, said that Labour would not block a second referendum on Scottish independence, in a significant shift of policy.

Nicola Sturgeon, the Scottish first minister and SNP leader, opened the door to a “progressive alliance� with Labour if the two parties were able to form a majority after a general election.

Ms Sturgeon said she was “no great fan� of Jeremy Corbyn, especially on Brexit, but that she would sign up to a pact that “could lock the Tories out of government�. Westminster is on high alert for Labour to table a vote of no confidence in Mr Johnson when MPs return next month.

Hours after Ms Sturgeon’s comments, Mr McDonnell, who is Mr Corbyn’s closest ally, said that the question of another independence poll should not be decided by the “English parliament�. The shadow chancellor’s intervention goes further than Mr Corbyn, who has previously said he will decide what to do once Ms Sturgeon had requested a referendum.

Mr McDonnell’s move led to a backlash from his colleagues, especially on the Scottish wing of the party. Ian Murray, Labour MP for Edinburgh South, accused him of being “willing to destroy our United Kingdom�. Speaking at the Edinburgh Fringe, Mr McDonnell said: “It will be for the Scottish parliament and the Scottish people to decide that. They will take a view about whether they want another referendum. Nicola Sturgeon said by late next year or the beginning of 2021.�

He told the broadcaster Iain Dale: “We would not block something like that. We would let the Scottish people decide. That’s democracy. There are other views within the party but that’s our view.�

Mr McDonnell’s stance contradicts the position of Richard Leonard, the Scottish Labour leader. In March Mr Leonard said that if a Labour government took power in Westminster it would refuse to grant a Section 30 order, which gives Holyrood the power to hold another independence vote.

The shadow chancellor said yesterday: “The Scottish parliament will come to a considered view on that and they will submit that to the government and the English parliament itself. If the Scottish people decide they want a referendum that’s for them.�

The No campaign won the Scottish independence referendum in September 2014 by 55 to 45 per cent. Mr Murray told PoliticsHome: “These are utterly irresponsible comments that betray our party’s values. The Labour Party is an internationalist party founded on a vision of solidarity and we should never seek to appease nationalists.�

He added: “John McDonnell has even bought into the nationalist narrative that Westminster is an ‘English parliament’ — an insult to the hard work by Scottish MPs from every party.

“We were promised that the 2014 referendum was once in a generation, and we have a duty to hold the nationalists to their promise by firmly opposing a divisive second referendum. But one of the architects of the Corbyn project that is destroying the Labour Party now appears willing to destroy our United Kingdom with thoughtless rants at the [Edinburgh] festival.�

Ruth Davidson, the Scottish Conservative leader, leapt on the remarks. “I feel for those Labour voters that stood side by side with major figures of their party and against the forces of nationalism in 2014. Know that the Scottish Tories will always stand up for our United Kingdom.�

Ms Sturgeon suggested she would join forces with Mr Corbyn against the Conservatives, although she attacked his approach to Brexit and said that a full coalition was not her intention.

After Ms Sturgeon’s party wiped out all but one of Labour’s MPs in Scotland — Mr Murray — at the 2015 election, one of Labour’s most viable paths to a majority at Westminster involves an alliance with the SNP. Ms Sturgeon told The Guardian on Tuesday: “We would always want to be part of a progressive alternative to a Tory government.�

If a vote of no confidence were passed, there would be a 14-day period for MPs to try to pass a motion of confidence in a new prime minister, although some in Downing Street believe that Mr Johnson could refuse to quit. If no new government were formed, a general election would be triggered. At present there are 247 Labour MPs and 35 SNP MPs, which combined is 29 fewer than the 311 Conservative MPs. A poll conducted by Lord Ashcroft after Mr Johnson’s visit to Scotland last week put support for independence at 46 per cent and opposition at 43 per cent.

A Labour spokesman said: “John McDonnell was clearly not advocating a second independence referendum. He made clear the huge benefit a UK Labour government will bring for the people of Scotland. Labour stands for an end to the status quo in the UK: economically, politically and constitutionally.�
Little John

Post by Little John »

So, McDonnell and Labour, in ever more transparent desperation, are prepared to play fast and loose with the integrity of the union in no less a despicable way than Remainers, more generally, have done so with NI.

And they (and, presumably, you) think there will not be political consequences to all of this?
Last edited by Little John on 07 Aug 2019, 08:53, edited 1 time in total.
stumuz1
Posts: 901
Joined: 07 Jun 2016, 22:12
Location: Anglesey

Post by stumuz1 »

UndercoverElephant wrote:
That would be very much a consitutional crisis, of the highest order.
What sort of consitutional crisis?

A convention one
A prerogative one
A Parliamentary procedure one
Speaker acting ultra viries one

There is plenty to choose from and all have happened before.

UndercoverElephant wrote:
There is no bigger constitutional crisis possible under the UK system. For the tory brexiteers, this is now a fight to the death, and they could take the monarchy down with them.
The Queen is not going to get dragged into this. The last time it happened (Macmillan) Her Majesty basically said'

"You Ministers get paid to sort this out. Sort it out."

If you think for a scintilla of a moment that the Queen will cheese off half of her subjects to sort Brexit, then you need to have a rest from keyboard pumping.

The reason we are at this impasse (which will pass) is our cowardly and undemocratic politicians refuse to make a decision.

However, it looks like a decision will be made for them on the 31st.
Locked