No. There's a general principle of EU law that requires the EU only to deal with representatives of member states and third countries which satisfies the legal and democratic requirements of those states/countries. Parliament is sovereign, which means that if the government tried to do something that conflicts with something parliament had voted for, and the EU was complicit, then the EU would also be doing something illegal under EU law. So I think the ECJ would rule that that non-revocation was illegitimate.Lord Beria3 wrote:
Revoking Article 50 could be voted for by parliament but can the government ignore the vote?
They were never likely to go anywhere.Don't know the full details but these talks look like they are in real trouble.
We have a binary choice ahead of us. By close of play next Friday, one of two things will have happened. We will either have left the EU with no deal, or the EU and UK will have agree a long extension, which will almost certainly lead, eventually, to a revocation of article 50. Presumably we will find out by the end of Wednesday evening which way it is going.
There is also a possibility that the decision to no-deal will be taken on Wednesday, and the EU will agree a short extension in an attempt to minimise the inevitable short-term chaos. What is certainly not going to happen is any more can-kicking by May. It's decision time.