Petrol duty and VAT rises to increase price of fuel
Moderator: Peak Moderation
- adam2
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10968
- Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
- Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis
Lower petrol prices for remote areas ?
More here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12203099
Sounds a wonderfull idea , how is it to be decided what is a remote area ?, clearly a well paid commitee must investigate the matter, whilst touring the country in Range Rovers and staying in nice hotels !
Having decided what are to be "remote areas", perhaps this could be re-defined as slightly remote, average remote, and very remote. A second commitee could report on this matter, perhaps with EU help.
Now decide by how much the petrol price should increase in "non-remote areas", perhaps there should be some transition system for "non remote but disadvantaged areas" third commitee required.
Now decide, how is this discounted fuel to be sold ? by a lower tax rate in remote areas perhaps ? OH NO ! that wont work, for fat cat bankers might drive through the remote area on the way to their country house, and obtain cheap fuel intended for locals.
Perhaps those in remote areas could be issued a special pass or permit allowing the purchase of discounted fuel ? OH NO ! that wont do, for we have decided against ID cards which this might resemble. And loyal peasants might be pressured to fill up their fat cat employers Range Rovers with the discounted fuel.
More commitees required, think of the employment created, a whole new government department would be needed, perhaps even a new ministry !
More here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12203099
Sounds a wonderfull idea , how is it to be decided what is a remote area ?, clearly a well paid commitee must investigate the matter, whilst touring the country in Range Rovers and staying in nice hotels !
Having decided what are to be "remote areas", perhaps this could be re-defined as slightly remote, average remote, and very remote. A second commitee could report on this matter, perhaps with EU help.
Now decide by how much the petrol price should increase in "non-remote areas", perhaps there should be some transition system for "non remote but disadvantaged areas" third commitee required.
Now decide, how is this discounted fuel to be sold ? by a lower tax rate in remote areas perhaps ? OH NO ! that wont work, for fat cat bankers might drive through the remote area on the way to their country house, and obtain cheap fuel intended for locals.
Perhaps those in remote areas could be issued a special pass or permit allowing the purchase of discounted fuel ? OH NO ! that wont do, for we have decided against ID cards which this might resemble. And loyal peasants might be pressured to fill up their fat cat employers Range Rovers with the discounted fuel.
More commitees required, think of the employment created, a whole new government department would be needed, perhaps even a new ministry !
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
Maybe we should just have TEQs?
New report launched this Tuesday. Get your copy here: http://teqs.net/report/
New report launched this Tuesday. Get your copy here: http://teqs.net/report/
- the mad cyclist
- Posts: 404
- Joined: 12 Jul 2010, 16:06
- Location: Yorkshire
adam2 wrote:Lower petrol prices for remote areas ?
A report on the local BBC news, claimed, that the rural North Yorkshires economy was grinding to a halt, due to the recent rise in fuel duty and VAT, in fact some people were not renewing their house insurance so they could keep driving.
So your average UK motorist drives approx 280km per week and an average size car consumes about 6.7 l/100km. 19litres per week x 3p = 57p.
Let nobody suppose that simple, inexpensive arrangements are faulty because primitive. If constructed correctly and in line with natural laws they are not only right, but preferable to fancy complicated devices.
Rolfe Cobleigh
Rolfe Cobleigh
- RenewableCandy
- Posts: 12780
- Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
- Location: York
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14820
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
This needs repeating.biffvernon wrote:Maybe we should just have TEQs?
New report launched this Tuesday. Get your copy here: http://teqs.net/report/
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14820
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
This needs repeating.biffvernon wrote:Maybe we should just have TEQs?
New report launched this Tuesday. Get your copy here: http://teqs.net/report/
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14820
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
And there's one huge problem, TMC. And I presume that's a UK figure, so is actually pretty good compared to our mad Yankee cousins?the mad cyclist wrote:an average size car consumes about 6.7 l/100km.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
- RenewableCandy
- Posts: 12780
- Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
- Location: York
Letter from our maverick city councillor to our local rag:
Classic stuffAnother way of looking at it is this: the world took one million years to produce the amount of oil we burn in one year. That is how quickly we a burning our planet’s resources.
I'd wager the vast majority of fuel is burnt at slow speeds in rush hour traffic rather than by boy racers late at night.Silas wrote:Perhaps if people were really worried about the cost of petrol they would SLOW DOWN! many more miles could be gleaned from a tank if people would chill out. Be interesting to see how expensive it must get before the penny drops and behavior changes.
I'm a realist, not a hippie
- the mad cyclist
- Posts: 404
- Joined: 12 Jul 2010, 16:06
- Location: Yorkshire
Yes, so what does that proof?DominicJ wrote: I'd wager the vast majority of fuel is burnt at slow speeds in rush hour traffic rather than by boy racers late at night.
Let nobody suppose that simple, inexpensive arrangements are faulty because primitive. If constructed correctly and in line with natural laws they are not only right, but preferable to fancy complicated devices.
Rolfe Cobleigh
Rolfe Cobleigh