clv101 wrote: ↑04 Dec 2022, 23:15
What did you make of the Jeffrey Sachs interview, Ken?
Firstly, the interviewer, Johan Allers, definitely had an agenda which Sachs agreed with, which was definitely anti American and entirely uncritical of Putin, hence the interview.
I did agree with some of what was said about America and its desire for world hegemony but the lack of any criticism of Putin reduced their message to me. Despite what America might or might not have done you cannot comment on this war without criticising Putin's attack on Ukraine. A great part of the problem is Putin's mindset and paranoia and desire to see Russia Great Again. Just like Trump's desire to Make America Great Again Putin's desire is dangerous and a threat to world peace.
As to NATO moving east, I don't think that is the case. The east has moved towards NATO because they don't trust Putin and his own Military Industrial Complex. The Russian MIC is just as polluting politically as the US version but in Russia is more powerful because it is owned by the ruling cabal. Putin, as most Russian rulers in the past, rules by fear and thinks that others do the same so he cannot comprehend that other countries voluntarily join an organisation. He cannot get it out of his head that America has forced or threatened all these countries to join NATO just as Russia forced the countries "under Russia's influence" to join the Warsaw Pact. It does not enter his head that the Eastern European States are not more afraid of the US than they are of him and that annoys him greatly so instead of friendly overtures he threatens every one. Hence not only have the former Warsaw Pact countries joined NATO but two formerly neutral countries have now applied to join.
If Putin bumps off Lukashenko, as seems likely, I can see a large number of Belarusian soldiers mutinying and turning against Putin and his forces if they are told to go into Ukraine. Putin would then face a war on two fronts against two countries which would finish him and his forces off completely. Of course the US, the CIA and NATO would get the blame but it would just be the desire of yet another country to get out from under the totalitarian yoke that is "friendship" with Mother Russia and its criminal rulers.
But Putin bumping off the Belorussian Foreign Minister and then the President to install their own puppet leader also contrasts with the American way of doing things through influence and in my view justifies
Although the American system is riddled with the corruption of the lobbying system and patronage, as is ours to a slightly lesser degree, the west does not have a system where a few oligarchs own virtually the whole economy and the President is at the top of the tree dispensing companies to those who he thinks will best look after his interests. And in the West people who displease the President don't fall out of windows or commit suicide by taking exotic poisons, even when living abroad.
But, at the end of the day, Putin has said that he wishes to reinstate the Soviet Empire and that trumps all his other excuses for starting the war. He might have been annoyed that former Soviet block countries had jumped ship and joined the other side but he wasn't intimidated by the encroachment of NATO he was just pissed off that it would now make it more difficult to walk in like he did in Ukraine. Belarus had better watch Putin's troops in the country now because, unlike NATO troops would ever do in another NATO country, they might well take the country over if their "leader" isn't enough of a puppet for Putin. There lies another important difference between the US and Putin's Russia.