EU immigration row / time to get out

Discussion of the latest Peak Oil news (please also check the Website News area below)

Moderator: Peak Moderation

User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

UndercoverElephant wrote: why are you still making provocative posts? Or do you still not understand why what you are posting is provocative?
Provocative? I thought that was the whole point of internet forums. :roll:

I only know two Romanians. They came here on a visitors' visa, stayed for ages working amazingly hard for lots of people who valued them enough to pay them enough cash to buy land and build a house in Romania. The nicest people one could wish for and have deservedly earned many English friends. Everyone a winner. Fortunately such folk will be able to do it legally next year.

Let's hope the Ukraine will be able to follow and will not remain shackled to their Russian oppressors.
Tarrel
Posts: 2466
Joined: 29 Nov 2011, 22:32
Location: Ross-shire, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Tarrel »

extractorfan wrote:I think people with fish on their head should be barred from winning prizes. Immigrants or not.
What, even fishing competitions? :shock:
Engage in geo-engineering. Plant a tree today.
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

Stamp out fishism in the arts.
Tarrel
Posts: 2466
Joined: 29 Nov 2011, 22:32
Location: Ross-shire, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Tarrel »

Talking of fish, the original post was citing immigration as a reason for exiting the EU. Another aspect of EU membership is the Common Fisheries Policy. There is a view up here that the Common Fisheries Policy has been instrumental in the decline of the local fishing industry.

I'd be interested in members' views as to whether we would be better off with or without the policy. Some things to consider:
- Sustainability: Is a CFP, with all its regulation, more or less likely to lead to sustainably managed fish stocks compared to a locally managed industry?
- EU expansion: Many of the newer entrants to the EU have limited coast lines, so the waters around the EU are feeding a proportionally larger population
- Localisation: Does a Common Fisheries Policy make sense in a future where fossil fuels are progressively more expensive, less available, and less acceptable to use?
Engage in geo-engineering. Plant a tree today.
User avatar
AndySir
Posts: 485
Joined: 23 Jun 2006, 14:10

Post by AndySir »

Did you read Monbiot on our governments idea of a fishing body?

http://www.monbiot.com/2013/11/25/plumbing-the-depths/
Tarrel
Posts: 2466
Joined: 29 Nov 2011, 22:32
Location: Ross-shire, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Tarrel »

AndySir wrote:Did you read Monbiot on our governments idea of a fishing body?

http://www.monbiot.com/2013/11/25/plumbing-the-depths/
Thx for link. No, haven't read it, but I will.
Engage in geo-engineering. Plant a tree today.
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14814
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

UndercoverElephant wrote:We are entirely unprepared for [climate change], and judging by the response so far, entirely incapable of responding to it in a meaningful way.
This is one of the saddest pieces of truth around, UE. People can't/won't recognise climate change even when it hits them in the face. And I mean that more or less literally.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
Pepperman
Posts: 772
Joined: 10 Oct 2010, 09:00

Re: EU immigration row / time to get out

Post by Pepperman »

UndercoverElephant wrote:There are too many people on this island already. An extra 500,000 or 1 million, is a disaster.
I haven't waded through this thread yet but just wanted to pick you up on this. What are you basing these numbers on? These are considerably higher than anything I've seen lately, even from organisations like Migration Watch
Little John

Re: EU immigration row / time to get out

Post by Little John »

Pepperman wrote:
UndercoverElephant wrote:There are too many people on this island already. An extra 500,000 or 1 million, is a disaster.
I haven't waded through this thread yet but just wanted to pick you up on this. What are you basing these numbers on? These are considerably higher than anything I've seen lately, even from organisations like Migration Watch
The last labour government blithely predicted that there would be around 50,000 poles and others arriving following accession. In the event, there were several hundred thousand who arrived on these shores. Bulgaria's and Romania’s populations are smaller than a country like Poland’s to be sure. However, these countries are far poorer than Poland and so there is a far greater incentive for Bulgarians and Romanians to migrate as a consequence.

How many will arrive from January 2014 is anyone's guess. But, given the entirely unprecedented scale of net immigration to this country that has occurred in recent years, it is not at all unreasonable to assume it may be in at least the hundreds of thousands. If it is not, then great. But, at the moment, we are relying on nothing more than poorly defined estimates and, given recent history, most of those estimate have proved to be hopeless underestimates. In the context of all of the above, UE's fear that it could be in the region of a half a million is no more unreasonable or implausible than any other guess and, in terms of the precautionary principle, is a lot more reasonable than some.
Pepperman
Posts: 772
Joined: 10 Oct 2010, 09:00

Re: EU immigration row / time to get out

Post by Pepperman »

stevecook172001 wrote:In the context of all of the above, UE's fear that it could be in the region of a half a million is no more unreasonable or implausible than any other guess and, in terms of the precautionary principle, is a lot more reasonable than some.
Hmmm not sure I can agree with that really. Plucking numbers out of the air is no way to argue for tighter immigration controls or against membership of the EU in my book.
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14814
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Re: EU immigration row / time to get out

Post by emordnilap »

stevecook172001 wrote:net immigration
Without wading through this thread, does anyone have accurate figures for net migration?
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
Pepperman
Posts: 772
Joined: 10 Oct 2010, 09:00

Post by Pepperman »

odaeio wrote:Ahh Bif, they could perhaps afford it, but WHERE is that "little piece of Britain" that they could use?

Who Owns Britain 2010

The Forestry Commission – 2.6 million acres

The National Trust – 630,000 acres

Ministry of Defence – 590,000 acres

Pension funds – 550,000 acres

Utilities like water and power – 500,000 acres

The Crown Estate – 360,000 acres

The RSPB – 320,000 acres

The Duke of Buccleuch – 240,000 acres

The National Trust for Scotland – 190,000 acres

The Duke of Atholl’s trusts – 150,000 acres

The top ten aristocratic owners

Duke of Buccleuch - 240,000 acres

Duke of Atholl's trusts - 150,000 acres

Prince Charles as the Duke of Cornwall - 134,000 acres

Duke of Westminster - 133,000 acres

Duke of Northumberland - 130,000 acres

Capt Alwyne Farquharson - 128,000 acres

Earl of Seafield - 101,000 acres

Countess of Sutherland - 82,000 acres

Baroness Willoughby de'Eresby - 78,000 acres

The Pearson family - 69,000 acres

The other 59 point some change million of us live on the remaining 7.7% of the land mass called Britain.................
The list there accounts for about 7m acres but there are 57m acres in Great Britain.

But I have to say it's very good to see the Forestry Commission and National Trust are the two biggest land owners in GB. I didn't realise that.
Pepperman
Posts: 772
Joined: 10 Oct 2010, 09:00

Re: EU immigration row / time to get out

Post by Pepperman »

emordnilap wrote:
stevecook172001 wrote:net immigration
Without wading through this thread, does anyone have accurate figures for net migration?
No one has accurate figures but the official figures are here:

http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/migration ... ation.html
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

Pepperman wrote: The list there accounts for about 7m acres but there are 57m acres in Great Britain.

But I have to say it's very good to see the Forestry Commission and National Trust are the two biggest land owners in GB. I didn't realise that.
It's land that, apart from the Forestry Commission, National Trust and RSPB bits, I would gladly see nationalised and distributed to the deserving poor. :)
Pepperman
Posts: 772
Joined: 10 Oct 2010, 09:00

Post by Pepperman »

Yeah I'm just curious where the 7.7% bit comes from.

ETA: I expected the largest private landowners to have a much bigger chunk of GB than that too.
Post Reply