NEWSFLASH! 5000 is the new 0.

RogerCO · Post by **RogerCO** » 28 Sep 2009, 13:30

What y'all have to remember is that the post count doesn't include posts made before the great hack of '05 (or was it '06 - fairly early on anyway). Not that it would make a great deal of difference as only a few thousand posts were lost (I think most were imported again but with names like user1, user2 etc)

I could have been a contender ... but then I stopped posting

mobbsey · Post by **mobbsey** » 28 Sep 2009, 19:54

To quote the great sage George Carlin, sounds like a lot of "dick waving" to me.

Adam1 · Post by **Adam1** » 29 Sep 2009, 11:32

Andy Hunt wrote:
clv101 wrote:I'm way past peak posting!
Don't speak too soon Chris . . . the future may prompt you to some 'unconventional commentary'

The problem with unconventional commentary is that it is often accompanied by disproportionate emissions which can worsen the climate on the forum.

emordnilap · Post by **emordnilap** » 29 Sep 2009, 12:13

The biggest cuts, the ones that would make the most positive effects, should be made - and could easily be made - by those responsible for the most per capita hot air: Americans.

syberberg · Post by **syberberg** » 29 Sep 2009, 15:04

mobbsey wrote:To quote the great sage George Carlin, sounds like a lot of "dick waving" to me.

If we were we'd be commenting on the length of post...

RenewableCandy · Post by **RenewableCandy** » 29 Sep 2009, 23:49

kenneal wrote:The prize for the most prolific poster must go to RenewableCandy at 5.95 posts per day since she joined in Sept 2007.

mobbsey wrote:To quote the great sage George Carlin, sounds like a lot of "dick waving" to me.

I've been accused of a lot of things...