Nobel Prize for Chemistry

Discussion of the latest Peak Oil news (please also check the Website News area below)

Moderator: Peak Moderation

Post Reply
User avatar
BritDownUnder
Posts: 2586
Joined: 21 Sep 2011, 12:02
Location: Hunter Valley, NSW, Australia

Nobel Prize for Chemistry

Post by BritDownUnder »

I personally think this is worth mentioning. The people who were behind the lithium ion battery have been recognised. As someone who has a Chemistry degree and worked briefly in the Chemical industry until I was fired I am very impressed by these three, particularly John Goodenough who still goes to work every day aged 97.

Link Here from Cleantechnica
I think there is not enough lithium in the world to supply the requirements for storage and instead efforts should be focussed on sodium and aluminium batteries as these materials are far more common even if the energy density may not be as good as lithium is.
John Goodenough, Accidental Inventor
In an interview with the Times earlier this year, Goodenough said he didn’t anticipate the impact his work would have. “At the time we developed the battery it was just something to do. I didn’t know what electrical engineers would do with the battery. I really didn’t anticipate cellphones, camcorders, and everything else.�

After the announcement on Wednesday, Goodenough said that he never sought nor expected to win the Nobel Prize. “Life is full of surprises,� he said, joking that at his age the prize “doesn’t make much difference.� Goodenough is 97 years old and still goes to work in his laboratory every day. He said he doesn’t regret not making a fortune from his discovery.

“I didn’t really care too much about the money,� he said. “Everything I’ve ever done, the lawyers end up with all the money.� He said he hoped the technology would continue to evolve to make electric cars more feasible. “We need to find a way to emancipate ourselves from dependence on burning fossil fuels.� Goodenough has said he wants to perfect the solid state lithium ion battery while he is still alive. That quest is one of the things that keeps him going.

Stanley Whittingham’s Discovery
Rechargeable batteries available in the 70s had very low energy density. Some of you may remember early phones that required users to lug around a battery about the size of a Volkswagen. It was thought that lithium might make batteries with greater energy density due to its light weight and willingness to give up a free electron upon demand. But lithium is highly reactive with other elements, which makes working with it difficult.

When OPEC shut off the flow of oil in the 70s, Stanley Whittingham went looking for alternative energy sources and wound up creating the first functional lithium battery. He started with lithium metal in the anode and lithium ions disbursed in titanium disulphide for the cathode. But when his battery was charged multiple times, it had one unfortunate tendency — it was prone to explode. To make it safer, he combined metallic lithium with aluminium in the anode.

John Goodenough was working at the University of Oxford at the time. He replaced the titanium disulphide in the Whittingham’s cathode with cobalt oxide — which made the battery more stable and doubled the output voltage

Akira Yoshino Puts All The Pieces Together
Akiro Yoshino took the process one step further. In 1985, he used the cathode developed by Goodenough and married it to an anode composed of lithium ions and electrons housed within a carbon material called petroleum coke. The result was a lightweight, compact battery that could be safely charged repeatedly. It became the first commercially viable lithium ion battery.

Energy storage research continues in laboratories around the world, looking for lighter, cheaper, more powerful batteries. Someday our grandkids may be amazed to learn the world was once dependent on such “old fashioned� technology. What is cutting edge today could be so yesterday a decade from now. But wherever the trail leads, it began with three researchers who figured out how to make a battery that was good enough to spark — you should pardon the expression — the transition away from burning fossil fuels.
G'Day cobber!
Post Reply