3-D Printing; the next digital Industrial Revolution

Discussion of the latest Peak Oil news (please also check the Website News area below)

Moderator: Peak Moderation

User avatar
Lord Beria3
Posts: 5066
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 20:57
Location: Moscow Russia
Contact:

3-D Printing; the next digital Industrial Revolution

Post by Lord Beria3 »

http://www.spiegel.de/international/bus ... 74833.html
When the TV series Star Trek first brought the starship Enterprise into German living rooms, the concept of a replicator was pure science fiction, a fantastical utopian vision we might experience one day centuries in the future. Replicators, something of a mixture between computer and miniature factory, were capable of creating food and replacement parts from next to nothing. They were highly practical devices, since Captain Kirk couldn't exactly take along a lot of supplies for his journeys through outer space. That futuristic vision, though, has receded far into the past -- overtaken by the present.

The real-world replicator-like technology poised to revolutionize the world is known as 3-D printing, though that term is misleading, since the process has little to do with printing. Three-dimensional printers can be as small as a suitcase or as large as a telephone booth, depending on the object they are meant to faithfully replicate from a 3-D computer blueprint. Inside the machine, the product is assembled by stacking extremely thin layers of material on top of one another, sort of like reassembling an apple that has been cut into super-fine slices.

Many different technological routes can be taken to reach the same goal. In one variation, nozzles spray liquid material into layers. Another method, which produces even better results, aims laser beams at finely powdered material, causing the grains to fuse together at precisely the spot where the beam hits. All 3-D printing techniques, however, follow the same principle: The object grows layer by layer, each one just a few hundredths of a millimeter thick, until it acquires the desired shape. This technique can be applied to steel, plastic, titanium, aluminum and many other metals.

Assembling, screwing together, adhering, welding -- all these processes are rendered obsolete when even the most complex shapes can be produced by a single machine using this casting technique. The end result can be an artificial hip, a hearing aid, a cell phone case, customized footwear or even the Urbee, a prototype car that has been making a splash.

Engineers at the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company (EADS) have used this technique to print out an entire bicycle that only needs added tires and a chain to be fully functional. British researchers, meanwhile, have printed a maneuverable drone with a rear-engine drive. Printed components are also used in Formula 1 racing and at NASA. Dental laboratories use 3-D printers to produce crowns, while doctors experiment with artificial heart tissue. Filmmakers also print animation models and automotive parts suppliers create replacement parts.
This sounds fascinating a real game-changer in terms of production and manufacturing.

It also provides na opportunity for a total reshaping of manufacturing from our current globalised way of doing things to a high-tech localised future which is more sustainable.

Worth a read even if you are a hard-core techie sceptic.
Peace always has been and always will be an intermittent flash of light in a dark history of warfare, violence, and destruction
User avatar
adam2
Site Admin
Posts: 10895
Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis

Post by adam2 »

This technology shows considerable promise and will no doubt improve, but the present and reasonably forseeable state of the process is a long way from being able to make even simple machines.

Currently available 3D printing technology uses liquid or powdered feedstock which is fused together in some way to produce a part of almost any shape, but made from the plastic or metal feedstock.

Usefull for example for the manufacture of small plastic or light alloy parts on a small volume or "one off" basis.
Only a limited range of materials are suitable for the process, and use of differing materials in the same component is very challenging.

I cant forsee being able to make a light bulb, or a small electric motor, or a bicycle for example, and these are relatively simple machines.
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
JavaScriptDonkey
Posts: 1683
Joined: 02 Jun 2011, 00:12
Location: SE England

Post by JavaScriptDonkey »

A cousin in my extended family runs a business doing 3D printing. He primarily makes prototype pieces for design evaluation and occasional 3D replication work.
As he lives in Australia and is a very distant cousin that I have met only once that is about all I know about 3D printing.
Snail

Post by Snail »

Cory Doctorow's written a novel about this called 'Makers'. It's about 3d printing which revitalises the American economy for a while; just how LB3 has described.

He releases his books for free and, if i remember it properly, Makers is pretty good.
User avatar
Ballard
Posts: 826
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Surrey

Post by Ballard »

We use 3d printing quite often to make scale models of building projects from the 3d cad data.

Models currently tend to be quite fragile, you can now buy a full colour 3d printing machine for £3000 if you so wish!

This is amusing...

http://twistedsifter.com/2012/11/3d-pri ... tchkovsky/
pɐɯ ǝuoƃ s,plɹoʍ ǝɥʇ
Yves75
Posts: 265
Joined: 13 Jul 2008, 13:27
Location: Paris, France
Contact:

Post by Yves75 »

So much bullshit around this thing ...
User avatar
Catweazle
Posts: 3388
Joined: 17 Feb 2008, 12:04
Location: Petite Bourgeois, over the hills

Post by Catweazle »

I'm normally a fan of technology, and I like all things mechanical, but I really can't see this technology making a serious impact. I heard how it will revolutionise garages for example, they will be able to print a spare part for your car, well I can't imagine they will ever be able to print a spark plug, or throttle cable, air filter, tyre valve, or in fact any of the parts we routinely need. Perhaps they could fabricate a wing mirror housing or plastic wheel trim, but that's hardly world changing.

Whilst it might be fun to print your own custom plastic clothes peg, I think the novelty will soon wear off, especially if the first 5 attempts have design flaws.

Bah humbug.
Little John

Post by Little John »

Catweazle wrote:I'm normally a fan of technology, and I like all things mechanical, but I really can't see this technology making a serious impact. I heard how it will revolutionise garages for example, they will be able to print a spare part for your car, well I can't imagine they will ever be able to print a spark plug, or throttle cable, air filter, tyre valve, or in fact any of the parts we routinely need. Perhaps they could fabricate a wing mirror housing or plastic wheel trim, but that's hardly world changing.

Whilst it might be fun to print your own custom plastic clothes peg, I think the novelty will soon wear off, especially if the first 5 attempts have design flaws.

Bah humbug.
I agree that this technology could not print something like a spark plug in a single unified run. The reason being that the different materials used in the different sub components of the plug would have different melting points. However, it should be perfectly possible to utilise several printers, each devoted to a particular material type to produce the each of the sub components, then assemble them after the printing has finished. In essence, this is what happens already. The sub components are separately manufactured and then assembled at the end.

I recall reading recently of the first metal 3D printer. It used fine drops of molten metal that were sprayed out onto a surface.
User avatar
Catweazle
Posts: 3388
Joined: 17 Feb 2008, 12:04
Location: Petite Bourgeois, over the hills

Post by Catweazle »

Let's take the example of the spark plug.

Assuming that you have a printer that can print high dielectric high temperature material ( the ceramic part ), as well as the copper core ( to take heat from the electrodes ) and the steel threaded portion, is this really going to be economical compared to a spark plug manufactured on machines turning them out by the thousands ?

For one-off parts and prototypes I can see the advantages, but how many unique things do we own or need ? We all have quite similar needs, and the economy will be forcing our choices to be even more similar in future.

No doubt millions of school kids will print cogs and gears for science projects, but where is the need for it in the home ? What are we lacking that we could print for ourselves ?

Industry will find a use, but for the average home it's about as useful as a CNC milling machine.
Little John

Post by Little John »

Catweazle wrote:Let's take the example of the spark plug.

Assuming that you have a printer that can print high dielectric high temperature material ( the ceramic part ), as well as the copper core ( to take heat from the electrodes ) and the steel threaded portion, is this really going to be economical compared to a spark plug manufactured on machines turning them out by the thousands ?

For one-off parts and prototypes I can see the advantages, but how many unique things do we own or need ? We all have quite similar needs, and the economy will be forcing our choices to be even more similar in future.

No doubt millions of school kids will print cogs and gears for science projects, but where is the need for it in the home ? What are we lacking that we could print for ourselves ?

Industry will find a use, but for the average home it's about as useful as a CNC milling machine.
I more or less agree.

The only way I could see this kind of technology hitting the home in any significant way would be if low melting point/high durability/multi purpose materials could be developed cheaply and where multi material 3D printers could be mass marketed to a point where they were as cheap as ordinary printers. If that happened, then there could conceivably be a market where, instead of buying an actual product from a manufacturer, one instead purchases and downloads the "blueprint" and then "prints" the product out. All of the above is exceedingly fanciful conjecture at present. However, all of it is technologically possible, in principle.

A perhaps less fanciful scenario might be where a manufacture advertises online and then prints products to order. This would allow the issue of printing infrastructure costs to be addressed by virtue of the volumes involved. The advantage to the manufacture of such a system is that they are far less limited in the range of goods they can produce
User avatar
sam_uk
Posts: 382
Joined: 20 Oct 2008, 15:02

Post by sam_uk »

I got quite excited by 3d printing a couple of months ago.

Doing a bit of research turned up this machine: http://filabot.com/ that will let you make your own plastic feedstock out of old drinks bottles.

I quite fancy getting a filabot + printer combo..
2 As and a B
Posts: 2590
Joined: 28 Nov 2008, 19:06

Post by 2 As and a B »

These 'printers' are for one-offs and short runs, so good for prototyping or personalising. I'd be interested to know what the mechanical and chemical strengths of the products are compared to traditional methods of production.
I'm hippest, no really.
User avatar
mobbsey
Posts: 2243
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Banbury
Contact:

Post by mobbsey »

When it can print in high-carbon hardened tool steel, get back to me!

If you want to "re-engineer" the industrial revolution that's what's required... you can't re-engineered the world in low density plastic :roll:

I would also presume (as I haven't found anyone who has the LCA) that 3D printing represents a higher level of embodied energy than mass injection moulding. Therefore, like so many other "solutions", it's going in completely the wrong direction.

Why not just give people land and let them grow what they need?
User avatar
Catweazle
Posts: 3388
Joined: 17 Feb 2008, 12:04
Location: Petite Bourgeois, over the hills

Post by Catweazle »

2 As and a B wrote:I'd be interested to know what the mechanical and chemical strengths of the products are compared to traditional methods of production.
They've got a way to go before making serious structural pieces. I recently read about the method of "printing" stainless steel.

They print a layer of glue, then spread stainless steel dust over it, then the next layer of glue and so on. Once the 3D part is finished it has the strength of wet sand, so it is put into a furnace where molten bronze wicks up into the porous 3D part to give it some strength. Not exactly a "print a part" workflow.
User avatar
Catweazle
Posts: 3388
Joined: 17 Feb 2008, 12:04
Location: Petite Bourgeois, over the hills

Post by Catweazle »

mobbsey wrote:Therefore, like so many other "solutions", it's going in completely the wrong direction.
I agree, the effort would be better expended in standardising component parts that could be manufactured efficiently and used in many different applications.

Why should there be 100 different types of van gearboxes when one or two would do the job ?

Do we need a choice of 50 microwave ovens ? Even if we do, do they need to have different, incompatible, internals ?

It all sounds a bit Stalinist, but it's true.
Post Reply