Taking the rarest of metals out of hydrogen electrolysis

Is the proposed 'Hydrogen Economy' going to save the human race or is it all an energy sink that provides no viable answer?

Moderator: Peak Moderation

Post Reply
User avatar
BritDownUnder
Posts: 2581
Joined: 21 Sep 2011, 12:02
Location: Hunter Valley, NSW, Australia

Taking the rarest of metals out of hydrogen electrolysis

Post by BritDownUnder »

I liked this article which explains quite well the role of some very rare, and often Russia is the largest supplier of, metals that are essential for reliable and efficient electrolysis production of hydrogen from water based solutions.

It also explains the efforts of some researchers to find more commonly available alternatives.
To be a completely green source of energy, hydrogen must be made by splitting water with electrolysis, with the electricity driving it derived from 100% renewable sources. But the electrolysis process needs catalysts to work – and the best current industrial electrodes use the precious metals iridium, ruthenium, and platinum. None of these metals are common, but iridium in particular is one of the rarest elements on Earth, with less than ten tonnes produced each year.
G'Day cobber!
User avatar
adam2
Site Admin
Posts: 11001
Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis

Re: Taking the rarest of metals out of hydrogen electrolysis

Post by adam2 »

I am all in favour of reducing reliance on rare or costly imported materials.
However hydrogen was produced long before the present day use of rare metals.

Knowles cells were used on an industrial scale to produce hydrogen decades ago for margarine manufacture and for inflating balloons, blimps and airships. Some were used into the 1960s.
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
User avatar
BritDownUnder
Posts: 2581
Joined: 21 Sep 2011, 12:02
Location: Hunter Valley, NSW, Australia

Re: Taking the rarest of metals out of hydrogen electrolysis

Post by BritDownUnder »

I had not heard of this type of cell but a look on the net reveals it to be about 65% efficient in converting hydrogen (less heating and pumping energy), one of the main drawbacks of hydrogen is the round trip energy efficiency compared with modern batteries.

I could not find what materials they were made from but at a guess it would be either carbon or iron based on what other electrolysers of the same era were using. i would think that the cells were continuously eroded and had to be replaced over the years.

I can see something like this coming back. From the article iridium seemed to be preferred as those electrodes had a lifespan of years rather than months reducing maintenance costs.
G'Day cobber!
Post Reply