Coal..
Moderator: Peak Moderation
- Totally_Baffled
- Posts: 2824
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Hampshire
Chris.
The 1.5billion tonnes figure came from the 2004 BP stats review. For some reason this was revised down to 220 million tonnes in 2005!!
I think the figures refer to those reserves actually in production.
There are for example at least 250 million tonnes in South Wales.
Funny numbers....
I will try and find a link.
TB
The 1.5billion tonnes figure came from the 2004 BP stats review. For some reason this was revised down to 220 million tonnes in 2005!!
I think the figures refer to those reserves actually in production.
There are for example at least 250 million tonnes in South Wales.
Funny numbers....
I will try and find a link.
TB
TB
Peak oil? ahhh smeg.....
Peak oil? ahhh smeg.....
Ah, okay, that must be to do with the: "generally taken to be those quantities that geological and engineering information indicates with reasonable certainty can be recovered in the future from known deposits under existing economic and operating conditions". I guess the coal at the bottom of the deep mines that have been closed are not reasonably recoverable under today?s economic and operating conditions.Totally_Baffled wrote:The 1.5billion tonnes figure came from the 2004 BP stats review. For some reason this was revised down to 220 million tonnes in 2005!!
As I understand it though reopening a deep mine is a very difficult thing to do, harder than starting from scratch... and it's not as if the Nintendo generation want to go down a mine! I wonder what the economic and operating conditions would have to look like for those reserves to increase back to 1500 million tonnes?
- Totally_Baffled
- Posts: 2824
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Hampshire
clv101 wrote:Ah, okay, that must be to do with the: "generally taken to be those quantities that geological and engineering information indicates with reasonable certainty can be recovered in the future from known deposits under existing economic and operating conditions". I guess the coal at the bottom of the deep mines that have been closed are not reasonably recoverable under today?s economic and operating conditions.Totally_Baffled wrote: The 1.5billion tonnes figure came from the 2004 BP stats review. For some reason this was revised down to 220 million tonnes in 2005!!
As I understand it though reopening a deep mine is a very difficult thing to do, harder than starting from scratch... and it's not as if the Nintendo generation want to go down a mine! I wonder what the economic and operating conditions would have to look like for those reserves to increase back to 1500 million tonnes?
Yep. The feasibility of those 1.5bn tonnes is certainly in doubt.
I guess it will (again) be a question of EROEI. (price in my view is second to EROEI, as if the latter is negative then the price in ?infinite!)
So in summary.
UK: =
No coal
No gas
No oil
No Wood
Nothing to burn.......
Shit.....
Everyone still opposed to nuclear power ?:shock:
TB
Peak oil? ahhh smeg.....
Peak oil? ahhh smeg.....
- mikepepler
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3096
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Rye, UK
- Contact:
Yes, indeed a fine observation on your behalf, Totally Baffled - shit - burns extraordinarily well, once dried that isTotally_Baffled wrote:
So in summary.
UK: =
No coal
No gas
No oil
No Wood
Nothing to burn.......
Shit.....
In fact the shepherds in my homeland have been burning cattle shit (goats, sheep) for thousands of years to keep themselves warm during cold nights in the desert (could go to even sub-zero).
I've written a letter about this to my local MP (George Galloway - yes I live in Tower Hamlets, lucky me!), explaining PO and providing a sample of deluxe, grade A, dried, goats shit, in the envelope
I have yet to receive a reply
Apologies for misspellings
They say an intelligent person knows how to solve problems that a wise person would know how to avoid... Think about it in the context of our society for a moment
-
- Posts: 859
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Sheffield
Coal 'could ease energy crisis'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/4480744.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/4480744.stm
He added: "I would suggest that the reopening of the coalfields and associated clean coal technology in power stations will produce electricity far cheaper than anything else that is currently being considered."
Mr Lavery's comments come as the price of wholesale gas has almost doubled during the past week, prompting fears about winter supplies to industry in the UK
-
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: 17 Oct 2009, 11:40
- Location: South Bernicia
- Contact:
There was something in the New Scientist some years back about (somehow) burning coal without actually taking it out of the gorund, somehow. Whether that would help the dificulty of having to re-open mines I don't know.
I do suppose coal, or at least native coal, is not that viable anymore Those mines are not closed for no good reason.
It might provide a little bit of easing, if we are willing to seriously cut down (which is possible, but it means giving up certain habits like my posting on internet forums in the wee small hours...)
I do suppose coal, or at least native coal, is not that viable anymore Those mines are not closed for no good reason.
It might provide a little bit of easing, if we are willing to seriously cut down (which is possible, but it means giving up certain habits like my posting on internet forums in the wee small hours...)
Did anyone see the BBC News item about CCS in Yorkshire, where almost one fifth of the UK's generating capacity, all coal, is located within a few square miles?
They reckon they are going to be able to generate zero carbon leccy from coal cheaper than offshore wind.
I know there's a lot of doubt over the viability of CCS for coal, but if we cracked it, and exported the tech to Chindia, it would probably do more to cut carbon emissions than all the renewables in the world put together.
They reckon they are going to be able to generate zero carbon leccy from coal cheaper than offshore wind.
I know there's a lot of doubt over the viability of CCS for coal, but if we cracked it, and exported the tech to Chindia, it would probably do more to cut carbon emissions than all the renewables in the world put together.
Andy Hunt
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
Eternal Sunshine wrote: I wouldn't want to worry you with the truth.
Yeh, but they haven't got TV's , PC's, DVD's, and iShite's to run. When you can get 240V 60Hz out of a cow's arse, please let me know.genoxy wrote wrote:
In fact the shepherds in my homeland have been burning cattle shit (goats, sheep) for thousands of years to keep themselves warm during cold nights in the desert (could go to even sub-zero).
A waste of good shit Genoxy. Should have sent him some shite!I've written a letter about this to my local MP (George Galloway - yes I live in Tower Hamlets, lucky me!), explaining PO and providing a sample of deluxe, grade A, dried, goats shit, in the envelope Very Happy
(Sorry if this contribution has changed. I pressed the Edit button instead of the Quote button and modified the text. I think I've put it back together properly. Ken)
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14287
- Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
- Location: Newbury, Berkshire
- Contact:
Doesn't 'proven recoverable reserves' refer to what would be economcally viable to recover? If the oil price shot up - or if coal import prices shot up - the reported reserves would probably dramatically rise (ignoring any carbon taxes).
As I understand it UK proven coal reserves were reported as being c.45 bn tons in 1980 and 0.22 bn tons in 2004! (don't quote me on those figs, though I'll try to dig out the sources if requested).
As I understand it UK proven coal reserves were reported as being c.45 bn tons in 1980 and 0.22 bn tons in 2004! (don't quote me on those figs, though I'll try to dig out the sources if requested).
- Totally_Baffled
- Posts: 2824
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Hampshire
I think you are right quintus, as the price rises the reserve number goes up.Quintus wrote:Doesn't 'proven recoverable reserves' refer to what would be economcally viable to recover? If the oil price shot up - or if coal import prices shot up - the reported reserves would probably dramatically rise (ignoring any carbon taxes).
As I understand it UK proven coal reserves were reported as being c.45 bn tons in 1980 and 0.22 bn tons in 2004! (don't quote me on those figs, though I'll try to dig out the sources if requested).
I guess it will be the elvel of production that would be the issue, even with coal (and certainly with UK coal)
TB
Peak oil? ahhh smeg.....
Peak oil? ahhh smeg.....