Coal..

Hydro-electricity? Fusion? Thermal Depolarization? Do we have any other real alternatives? Including utility scale energy storage.

Moderator: Peak Moderation

User avatar
Totally_Baffled
Posts: 2824
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Hampshire

Post by Totally_Baffled »

Chris.

The 1.5billion tonnes figure came from the 2004 BP stats review. For some reason this was revised down to 220 million tonnes in 2005!!

I think the figures refer to those reserves actually in production.

There are for example at least 250 million tonnes in South Wales.

Funny numbers.... :?

I will try and find a link.


TB
TB

Peak oil? ahhh smeg..... :(
User avatar
clv101
Site Admin
Posts: 10604
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Contact:

Post by clv101 »

Totally_Baffled wrote:The 1.5billion tonnes figure came from the 2004 BP stats review. For some reason this was revised down to 220 million tonnes in 2005!!
Ah, okay, that must be to do with the: "generally taken to be those quantities that geological and engineering information indicates with reasonable certainty can be recovered in the future from known deposits under existing economic and operating conditions". I guess the coal at the bottom of the deep mines that have been closed are not reasonably recoverable under today?s economic and operating conditions.

As I understand it though reopening a deep mine is a very difficult thing to do, harder than starting from scratch... and it's not as if the Nintendo generation want to go down a mine! I wonder what the economic and operating conditions would have to look like for those reserves to increase back to 1500 million tonnes?
User avatar
Totally_Baffled
Posts: 2824
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Hampshire

Post by Totally_Baffled »

clv101 wrote:
Totally_Baffled wrote: The 1.5billion tonnes figure came from the 2004 BP stats review. For some reason this was revised down to 220 million tonnes in 2005!!
Ah, okay, that must be to do with the: "generally taken to be those quantities that geological and engineering information indicates with reasonable certainty can be recovered in the future from known deposits under existing economic and operating conditions". I guess the coal at the bottom of the deep mines that have been closed are not reasonably recoverable under today?s economic and operating conditions.

As I understand it though reopening a deep mine is a very difficult thing to do, harder than starting from scratch... and it's not as if the Nintendo generation want to go down a mine! I wonder what the economic and operating conditions would have to look like for those reserves to increase back to 1500 million tonnes?

Yep. The feasibility of those 1.5bn tonnes is certainly in doubt.

I guess it will (again) be a question of EROEI. (price in my view is second to EROEI, as if the latter is negative then the price in ?infinite!)

So in summary.

UK: =

No coal

No gas

No oil

No Wood

Nothing to burn.......

Shit.....

Everyone still opposed to nuclear power ?:shock: :D :P :twisted:
TB

Peak oil? ahhh smeg..... :(
User avatar
mikepepler
Site Admin
Posts: 3096
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Rye, UK
Contact:

Post by mikepepler »

Totally_Baffled wrote: UK: =

No coal

No gas

No oil

No Wood

Nothing to burn.......
Not looking good is it? I guess we need a lot of renewables, and maybe nuclear too to tide us over...
DamianB
Site Admin
Posts: 553
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Dorset

Post by DamianB »

Totally_Baffled wrote: UK: =

No coal

No gas

No oil

No Wood

Nothing to burn.......
No population (reduction) policy either :)
"If the complexity of our economies is impossible to sustain [with likely future oil supply], our best hope is to start to dismantle them before they collapse." George Monbiot
genoxy
Posts: 127
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: London
Contact:

Post by genoxy »

Totally_Baffled wrote:
So in summary.

UK: =

No coal

No gas

No oil

No Wood

Nothing to burn.......

Shit.....
Yes, indeed a fine observation on your behalf, Totally Baffled - shit - burns extraordinarily well, once dried that is :D

In fact the shepherds in my homeland have been burning cattle shit (goats, sheep) for thousands of years to keep themselves warm during cold nights in the desert (could go to even sub-zero).

I've written a letter about this to my local MP (George Galloway - yes I live in Tower Hamlets, lucky me!), explaining PO and providing a sample of deluxe, grade A, dried, goats shit, in the envelope :D

I have yet to receive a reply :(

Apologies for misspellings :wink:
They say an intelligent person knows how to solve problems that a wise person would know how to avoid... Think about it in the context of our society for a moment :wink:
bigjim
Posts: 694
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Cleethorpes

Post by bigjim »

Ooo 'eck!

Looks like there'll be a huge shift soon. Britain will be a third world country. And the Chinese, who are seemingly in the middle of their economic revolution, may well be enjoying a nice lifestyle for another 50 odd years depending on their coal reserves.
fishertrop
Posts: 859
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Sheffield

Post by fishertrop »

Coal 'could ease energy crisis'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/4480744.stm
He added: "I would suggest that the reopening of the coalfields and associated clean coal technology in power stations will produce electricity far cheaper than anything else that is currently being considered."

Mr Lavery's comments come as the price of wholesale gas has almost doubled during the past week, prompting fears about winter supplies to industry in the UK
User avatar
Eth666us
Posts: 10
Joined: 03 May 2008, 10:10

Post by Eth666us »

beev wrote:Coal is one of the reasons why I'm not about to panic. If all the oil ran out tomorrow, coal and carbon-rationing would get us through. It's not great for the environment, but it's better than starving!

The problem would be evident if there were not fossil fuels and nuclear plants...
the_lyniezian
Posts: 1125
Joined: 17 Oct 2009, 11:40
Location: South Bernicia
Contact:

Post by the_lyniezian »

There was something in the New Scientist some years back about (somehow) burning coal without actually taking it out of the gorund, somehow. Whether that would help the dificulty of having to re-open mines I don't know.

I do suppose coal, or at least native coal, is not that viable anymore Those mines are not closed for no good reason.

It might provide a little bit of easing, if we are willing to seriously cut down (which is possible, but it means giving up certain habits like my posting on internet forums in the wee small hours...)
User avatar
Andy Hunt
Posts: 6760
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Bury, Lancashire, UK

Post by Andy Hunt »

Did anyone see the BBC News item about CCS in Yorkshire, where almost one fifth of the UK's generating capacity, all coal, is located within a few square miles?

They reckon they are going to be able to generate zero carbon leccy from coal cheaper than offshore wind.

I know there's a lot of doubt over the viability of CCS for coal, but if we cracked it, and exported the tech to Chindia, it would probably do more to cut carbon emissions than all the renewables in the world put together.
Andy Hunt
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
Eternal Sunshine wrote: I wouldn't want to worry you with the truth. :roll:
Aurora

Post by Aurora »

genoxy wrote wrote:
In fact the shepherds in my homeland have been burning cattle shit (goats, sheep) for thousands of years to keep themselves warm during cold nights in the desert (could go to even sub-zero).
Yeh, but they haven't got TV's , PC's, DVD's, and iShite's to run. When you can get 240V 60Hz out of a cow's arse, please let me know. :wink: :lol:
I've written a letter about this to my local MP (George Galloway - yes I live in Tower Hamlets, lucky me!), explaining PO and providing a sample of deluxe, grade A, dried, goats shit, in the envelope Very Happy
A waste of good shit Genoxy. :wink: Should have sent him some shite!

(Sorry if this contribution has changed. I pressed the Edit button instead of the Quote button and modified the text. I think I've put it back together properly. Ken) :lol:
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin
Posts: 14287
Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Contact:

Post by kenneal - lagger »

Aurora wrote:A waste of good shit Genoxy. :wink: Should have sent him some shite!
Waste of time, he's full of that already. :lol:
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
User avatar
Quintus
Posts: 598
Joined: 23 Apr 2009, 16:57
Location: UK

Post by Quintus »

Doesn't 'proven recoverable reserves' refer to what would be economcally viable to recover? If the oil price shot up - or if coal import prices shot up - the reported reserves would probably dramatically rise (ignoring any carbon taxes).

As I understand it UK proven coal reserves were reported as being c.45 bn tons in 1980 and 0.22 bn tons in 2004! (don't quote me on those figs, though I'll try to dig out the sources if requested).
User avatar
Totally_Baffled
Posts: 2824
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Hampshire

Post by Totally_Baffled »

Quintus wrote:Doesn't 'proven recoverable reserves' refer to what would be economcally viable to recover? If the oil price shot up - or if coal import prices shot up - the reported reserves would probably dramatically rise (ignoring any carbon taxes).

As I understand it UK proven coal reserves were reported as being c.45 bn tons in 1980 and 0.22 bn tons in 2004! (don't quote me on those figs, though I'll try to dig out the sources if requested).
I think you are right quintus, as the price rises the reserve number goes up.

I guess it will be the elvel of production that would be the issue, even with coal (and certainly with UK coal)
TB

Peak oil? ahhh smeg..... :(
Post Reply