Falling North Sea output a good thing?
Posted: 25 Jul 2005, 20:23
It would seem as tho oil production from the North Sea is either in strong decline or may have even fallen off a cliff:
http://ogj.pennnet.com/articles/article ... 232634&p=7
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/artic ... 37,00.html
Good this be a good thing for the UK ?
On the face of it, it's all BAD BAD news:
a) loss of tax revenues
b) loss of GDP contributions
c) having to import at HIGH prices
d) ...after having sold the crown jewels at $20/barrel
BUT
a) bringing the situation to a head asap is surely a good thing
b) it might force serious change on the Uk earlier than it might have done
c) a huge slice of the oil that is extracted is exported straight to the USA - less oil out of the ground means less goes overseas
d) the tail-end of the fields will remain and we only really need a few 100kbpd to run the essential stuff
The Uk economy is one of the best in Europe (on paper), but a lot of this comes from North Sea oil - if we drop to the bottom of the league table it might wake people up (we might even get a bigger EU grant!).
The sudden loss of oil forced Cuba into radical change, which was mostly good for the country overall - a similar shock-and-change might also leave the Uk in a better postion in teh end.
There is no avoiding the pain of chnage, we might as well bring it to a head asap so we can make a start on a new lifestyle.
Personally I have no faith in a Uk population wake-up as we are, I think we need a big and clear signal like this (or like the 2012 Olympics in a fuel-rationed london) to really trigger change.
What do people think?
http://ogj.pennnet.com/articles/article ... 232634&p=7
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/artic ... 37,00.html
Good this be a good thing for the UK ?
On the face of it, it's all BAD BAD news:
a) loss of tax revenues
b) loss of GDP contributions
c) having to import at HIGH prices
d) ...after having sold the crown jewels at $20/barrel
BUT
a) bringing the situation to a head asap is surely a good thing
b) it might force serious change on the Uk earlier than it might have done
c) a huge slice of the oil that is extracted is exported straight to the USA - less oil out of the ground means less goes overseas
d) the tail-end of the fields will remain and we only really need a few 100kbpd to run the essential stuff
The Uk economy is one of the best in Europe (on paper), but a lot of this comes from North Sea oil - if we drop to the bottom of the league table it might wake people up (we might even get a bigger EU grant!).
The sudden loss of oil forced Cuba into radical change, which was mostly good for the country overall - a similar shock-and-change might also leave the Uk in a better postion in teh end.
There is no avoiding the pain of chnage, we might as well bring it to a head asap so we can make a start on a new lifestyle.
Personally I have no faith in a Uk population wake-up as we are, I think we need a big and clear signal like this (or like the 2012 Olympics in a fuel-rationed london) to really trigger change.
What do people think?