PowerSwitch

I love new music, art, language, literature, insults etc etc. Innovation, new thinking and ideas? Keep 'em coming.

However, forgive me for never, ever wishing to frequent a place such as this.

A burger joint - not just for the usual losers, but for total losers. No human interaction required, sterility guaranteed (particularly if using gm ingredients ) and the crassness is gobsmacking, though that might be a cultural thing with me; apologies to the Japanese if so.

The sheer weight of technology - remember, this is surrounding the simple, basic act of eating - in the video is stunning and will give Tesco some ideas. Roll on the collapse.

It's only one step further than the conveyor belt system of Yo Sushi and the like.

Not a fan myself but I would give it a go. It might feel like being in the Jetsons.

It's when they have a terminal like that in everybody's home that we will know that Big Brother has really arrived.

What the heck's the point of going to a restaurant if you can't chat-up the waiter?? (Actually, I did just that at a Yo! on my way to a job interview once. I didn't get the job )

That snack shack can be used as an example of the Jevons effect.

There's also diverging trends of energy expended verses units of GDP created, sometimes showing the energy line actually going downward to make a point - a classic statistical lie.

We increasingly use energy for increasingly useless ends.

RenewableCandy wrote:What the heck's the point of going to a restaurant if you can't chat-up the waiter?? (Actually, I did just that at a Yo! on my way to a job interview once. I didn't get the job )

Careful when talking to waiters. (Badly translated but you get the picture ).

RenewableCandy wrote:What the heck's the point of going to a restaurant if you can't chat-up the waiter?? (Actually, I did just that at a Yo! on my way to a job interview once. I didn't get the job )

Ah, but did you get the waiter?

That's between me and my Security Consultant

Actually the restaurant idea has its merits. It means you can continue to engage with your smartphone without being distracted by the presence of a real person.

On second thoughts, it's positively archaic compared to this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewNLCkA0oBk

Tarrel wrote:Actually the restaurant idea has its merits. It means you can continue to engage with your smartphone without being distracted by the presence of a real person.

You're being a bit plural there.

emordnilap wrote:

Tarrel wrote:Actually the restaurant idea has its merits. It means you can continue to engage with your smartphone without being distracted by the presence of a real person.

You're being a bit plural there.

Well, more ironic I thought.

Emord seems to be having a singular Plural thing going on here...