the frack thread
Moderator: Peak Moderation
Fracking temporarily suspended for third time as micro quakes are triggered. I expect the government to relax the regulations in the next few days on the intensity of quake which requires fracking to stop.
a 0.8 quake is about the same as a car passing 100m away (my guess). Previously a 4.0 (?) quake was triggered, which is about a heavy truck at 10 metres (again, my guess)
These small quakes seem like the least significant reason to halt fracking, but I can think of far more important reasons that this government runs rough-shod over.
a 0.8 quake is about the same as a car passing 100m away (my guess). Previously a 4.0 (?) quake was triggered, which is about a heavy truck at 10 metres (again, my guess)
These small quakes seem like the least significant reason to halt fracking, but I can think of far more important reasons that this government runs rough-shod over.
We had a 4 quake in Leicestershire about 8 years ago and there was the odd bit of building damage - tiles etc. I was lying down at the time and the bed definitely shook [not due to my efforts!]
OK 16 years ago:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... itain.html
OK 16 years ago:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... itain.html
- RenewableCandy
- Posts: 12777
- Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
- Location: York
-
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: 14 Mar 2009, 11:26
Naked Capitalism: Fracking in 2018: Another Year of Pretending to Make Money
Includes this gem:
Includes this gem:
The delusion is getting ever more palpable - particularly now with slumping oil prices coupled with the Fed raising rates incrementallyHowever, Reuters recently analyzed 32 fracking companies and declared that “U.S. shale firms are more profitable than ever after a strong third quarter.� How is this possible?
Reading a bit further reveals what Reuters considers “profits.�
“The group’s cash flow deficit has narrowed to $945 million as U.S.benchmark crude hit $70 a barrel and production soared,� reported Reuters.
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools - Douglas Adams.
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14814
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
And there’s all this talk of the US being a major oil producer, Trump’s cawing about the strength of the economy etc. plus unreal debt, most of it in dollars.
A major reset is imminent.
A major reset is imminent.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
-
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: 14 Mar 2009, 11:26
Chris Martenson agrees with you on that:emordnilap wrote:And there’s all this talk of the US being a major oil producer, Trump’s cawing about the strength of the economy etc. plus unreal debt, most of it in dollars.
A major reset is imminent.
Peak Prospertity: The Shale Oil Revolution Actually Reflects a Nation in DeclineChris Martenson wrote: Beyond the significance of not having an energy strategy, there’s the more immediate predicament of how a nation up to its armpits in debt, and sinking rapidly, is going to fare when the great output boom stops and then heads into reverse.
High levels of debt and rising energy costs are a terrible combination.
We’re placing that collision within the next three years. Are you prepared for that?
As things stand, the US will blunder into that new era completely unprepared, as one might expect for a nation in decline.
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools - Douglas Adams.
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14814
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
-
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: 14 Mar 2009, 11:26
Justin Mikulka: Are investors finally waking up to North America's Fracked Gas Crisis?
Fracking companies still can't make ends meet and almost certainly, never will.
This is the result of interest rates at being virtually zero for over a decade.The North American natural gas industry is facing a crisis with an oversupplied market and producers that are losing money. Those producers desperately need higher natural gas prices.
However, higher gas prices mean renewables become even more attractive to investors, which may lead to gas following in the footsteps of coal — dying at the hands of the free market.
It may take some time, but eventually investors wake up — or run out of money
Fracking companies still can't make ends meet and almost certainly, never will.
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools - Douglas Adams.
-
- Posts: 6595
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
- Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont
I think you should consider the source there and look further.raspberry-blower wrote:Justin Mikulka: Are investors finally waking up to North America's Fracked Gas Crisis?
This is the result of interest rates at being virtually zero for over a decade.The North American natural gas industry is facing a crisis with an oversupplied market and producers that are losing money. Those producers desperately need higher natural gas prices.
However, higher gas prices mean renewables become even more attractive to investors, which may lead to gas following in the footsteps of coal — dying at the hands of the free market.
It may take some time, but eventually investors wake up — or run out of money
Fracking companies still can't make ends meet and almost certainly, never will.
For example Exxon the no. 2 gas producer has annual revenues of 71 billion and long term debt of 34 billion and that number is declining while dividends have been kept high. Hardly a company in distress. Recent low oil and gas prices have tightened margins and some small companies will not survive but the big dogs will as usual win out in the end.
-
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: 14 Mar 2009, 11:26
VT you are making a false analogy here.vtsnowedin wrote: I think you should consider the source there and look further.
For example Exxon the no. 2 gas producer has annual revenues of 71 billion and long term debt of 34 billion and that number is declining while dividends have been kept high. Hardly a company in distress. Recent low oil and gas prices have tightened margins and some small companies will not survive but the big dogs will as usual win out in the end.
The Desmog article is primarily concerned about companies that use fracking as their primary method to collect oil or gas.
ExxonMobil do not rely on fracking as their PRIMARY method of hydrocarbon extraction - they have been sniffing around for "distressed assets" in the fracking sector, though.
The Big Oil Cos are in a far stronger position to weather any storm than the fracking fly-by-nights that have never made a nickel profit in their entire wretched existance
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools - Douglas Adams.
-
- Posts: 6595
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
- Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont
What are you smoking? Exxon is the number two producer of natural gas in the US, perhaps the world.raspberry-blower wrote:VT you are making a false analogy here.vtsnowedin wrote: I think you should consider the source there and look further.
For example Exxon the no. 2 gas producer has annual revenues of 71 billion and long term debt of 34 billion and that number is declining while dividends have been kept high. Hardly a company in distress. Recent low oil and gas prices have tightened margins and some small companies will not survive but the big dogs will as usual win out in the end.
The Desmog article is primarily concerned about companies that use fracking as their primary method to collect oil or gas.
ExxonMobil do not rely on fracking as their PRIMARY method of hydrocarbon extraction - they have been sniffing around for "distressed assets" in the fracking sector, though.
The Big Oil Cos are in a far stronger position to weather any storm than the fracking fly-by-nights that have never made a nickel profit in their entire wretched existance
The 1990 Bishop's Castle earthquake was about level 5.
I was working in a first floor office at a shopping mall in Redditch at the time.
I first thought that some moron had crept up behind me and was shaking my chair as a joke.
I then turned round and saw the vertical panels in the corridor behind me rippling backwards and forwards.
At that point I assumed that the IRA had set of a bomb in the shops below.
Strangely people walking around didn't notice the shock ... only those sitting down were affected.
I was working in a first floor office at a shopping mall in Redditch at the time.
I first thought that some moron had crept up behind me and was shaking my chair as a joke.
I then turned round and saw the vertical panels in the corridor behind me rippling backwards and forwards.
At that point I assumed that the IRA had set of a bomb in the shops below.
Strangely people walking around didn't notice the shock ... only those sitting down were affected.
-
- Posts: 6595
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
- Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont
Sooner or later all costs are covered by the sale price of the gas being delivered. That the supply continues and is even growing shows that overall it is a profitable business.fuzzy wrote:Presumably the fracking is done by 'frackers -r- us' out of yellow pages. These are the guys [sub contractors] who take the hit, not Exxon.
There are of course various stock scams that rip off foolish investors etc. but the idea that every firm small or large engaged in fracking gas and oil production is losing money is ridiculous.
If a big firm like Exxon subs out a process like fracking it relies on that sub to not only frack this years wells but needs them to still be in business next year for next years wells. Exxon has to pay them a living wage as it were.