Should voluntary work be rationed?
Posted: 21 Jul 2011, 23:57
I have been involved on and off in voluntary work since school. In fact i am proud to have been part of some voluntary groups. My old school actually pionerred some of the early work on getting school age students doing voluntary work, and one of the first volunteer bureaus was set up whilst I was at school.
Everything worked OK, there never appeare to be more time spent raising money than doing what we were meant to be doing. Granted the area was reasonably wealthy , but we only had one sponsored walk a year.
Even when I was involved in practical conservation work later on, we just got on and did the job. Rarely any problems, until there was an expansion in operations and we has paid staff involved, who grumbled the office was not suitable. It was good enough for us, and we were one of the main practical conservation outfits in UK, and we were doing a lot of work, all unpaid.
I think the rot in voluntary work started whe someone in government suggested the unemployed should be doing voluntary work, only to be told the unemployment office would not allow them to do so. Doors opened and the unemployment offices too an interst in voluntary work, as if it was their idea and baby.
On returning to voluntary/community work 10 years ago, I found much of thoe organisation, which had built up from the volunterr bureau, lokked like a department of local council, and there were similar attitudes towards money, expenses and training.
And then i got involve in a project I liked, There had been a suggestion of a paid job, but the grant money was not secured, so I offered to continue as a volunteer, only to be told I could only do a certain amount. The excuse was that some one might think I was being exploited, absolutely crazy. Unfortunately I lost control, got upset and was asked to leave.
The latest project I have been involved, has some paid staff, but is mainly volunteers. From day 1 of the project going live, I felt uncomfotable, and decided I would partly leave to do my own thing, but someone else was getting upset. It sounded very much deja vu, and eventually we all had a meeting and one action has been to restrict number of hours volunteers can do. I find this so negative, and counterproductive. Should volunteering be rationed?
If anyone watched thatr Mary Portas series where she helped a charity shop, then you will start to understand some of the negative things that can happen, if to don't fully understand what voluntary work is all about. It seems that making money is more important than the people to give their time free.
I am concerned that with the government trying to get more communities running things, then all that will happen is a replacement of paid council staff running things with unpaid pseudo council volunteers running things.
Voluntary work is much more than completing a task, it is taking part, and I think it is (or has been) taken over by form filling, pen pushing bureaucrats.
Everything worked OK, there never appeare to be more time spent raising money than doing what we were meant to be doing. Granted the area was reasonably wealthy , but we only had one sponsored walk a year.
Even when I was involved in practical conservation work later on, we just got on and did the job. Rarely any problems, until there was an expansion in operations and we has paid staff involved, who grumbled the office was not suitable. It was good enough for us, and we were one of the main practical conservation outfits in UK, and we were doing a lot of work, all unpaid.
I think the rot in voluntary work started whe someone in government suggested the unemployed should be doing voluntary work, only to be told the unemployment office would not allow them to do so. Doors opened and the unemployment offices too an interst in voluntary work, as if it was their idea and baby.
On returning to voluntary/community work 10 years ago, I found much of thoe organisation, which had built up from the volunterr bureau, lokked like a department of local council, and there were similar attitudes towards money, expenses and training.
And then i got involve in a project I liked, There had been a suggestion of a paid job, but the grant money was not secured, so I offered to continue as a volunteer, only to be told I could only do a certain amount. The excuse was that some one might think I was being exploited, absolutely crazy. Unfortunately I lost control, got upset and was asked to leave.
The latest project I have been involved, has some paid staff, but is mainly volunteers. From day 1 of the project going live, I felt uncomfotable, and decided I would partly leave to do my own thing, but someone else was getting upset. It sounded very much deja vu, and eventually we all had a meeting and one action has been to restrict number of hours volunteers can do. I find this so negative, and counterproductive. Should volunteering be rationed?
If anyone watched thatr Mary Portas series where she helped a charity shop, then you will start to understand some of the negative things that can happen, if to don't fully understand what voluntary work is all about. It seems that making money is more important than the people to give their time free.
I am concerned that with the government trying to get more communities running things, then all that will happen is a replacement of paid council staff running things with unpaid pseudo council volunteers running things.
Voluntary work is much more than completing a task, it is taking part, and I think it is (or has been) taken over by form filling, pen pushing bureaucrats.