Page 1 of 2

The case for cannibalism

Posted: 20 Dec 2010, 14:49
by dudley
This article is food for thought.

http://www.slate.com/id/2278240/

Image

Posted: 20 Dec 2010, 15:22
by JohnB
I suppose that could explain why so many more humans are being bred, and why a lot of them are being fattened up. I'm not sure that filling them full of nasty chemicals is a good idea though!

Posted: 20 Dec 2010, 15:50
by ziggy12345
When there are too many people and not enough food this is the perfect solution

Posted: 20 Dec 2010, 15:54
by DominicJ
Its an interesting article, but I'll leave killing and eating the neighbours off the plan for now.
Now killing them and feeding them to pigs....

Posted: 20 Dec 2010, 16:09
by RenewableCandy
The article didn't mention the most obvious example of cannibalism in present-day human culture. Though symbolic only, don't christians still eat the bread and drink the wine? I wonder if the ceremony was, in some way, devised as a substitute for whatever went before :shock: ?

Posted: 20 Dec 2010, 16:16
by DominicJ
Jesus turned himself into crackers because he wanted us to eat him, but didnt want us to be canibals.

Grok?

Posted: 20 Dec 2010, 16:22
by RenewableCandy
Grok.

Sensible chap he was. But the fact that he felt it necessary to do so is, by itself, an interesting comment on our (ancestors') atitude to cannibalism.

Posted: 20 Dec 2010, 16:56
by featherstick
RenewableCandy wrote:The article didn't mention the most obvious example of cannibalism in present-day human culture. Though symbolic only, don't christians still eat the bread and drink the wine? I wonder if the ceremony was, in some way, devised as a substitute for whatever went before :shock: ?
True believers will tell you that the bread and wine are NOT symbolic, they actually turn into blood and flesh upon ingestion. I have had this discussion with a converted Catholic girlfriend. Crackers indeed.

Posted: 20 Dec 2010, 17:09
by lurker
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eucharisti ... l_presence

Every church has its own different version of it.

madness!

:lol:

Posted: 20 Dec 2010, 17:11
by emordnilap
featherstick wrote:Crackers indeed.
You mean wafers?

Seriously, I agree. It's bananas.

Posted: 20 Dec 2010, 18:43
by JohnB
emordnilap wrote:Seriously, I agree. It's bananas.
Have you got a Bible reference for bananas? I don't remember them being mentioned in my misguided youth!

Posted: 20 Dec 2010, 19:40
by emordnilap
JohnB wrote:
emordnilap wrote:Seriously, I agree. It's bananas.
Have you got a Bible reference for bananas? I don't remember them being mentioned in my misguided youth!
!

Posted: 20 Dec 2010, 20:11
by DominicJ
the jesus crackers thing was a south park quote, series 4, do the handicapped go to hell.

And yes, the specifics are a hotly contested topic, i think its one of the biggies that keep apart anglo and roman catholics.

Posted: 20 Dec 2010, 20:25
by Mean Mr Mustard
The Catholic church were apparently content from a doctrinal point of view with the cannibalism following the Uruguayan AF Andes plane crash in the early 70s. Surviving members of the rugby team concluded it would have been a greater sin to have let themselves starve. And the two that managed to trek across into Chile to summon help were on increased 'rations' prior to their breakout.

I read Nando Parrado's book. Very well written. The film 'Alive' was good too.

Posted: 20 Dec 2010, 20:26
by biffvernon
What did they do on Fridays?