With a 32 percent turnout. Yah right!! At least he didn't claim a 99 percent vote. That makes it all good.Little John wrote:He was democratically elected. .
Is it really hard to fathom why many people despise the US?
Moderator: Peak Moderation
-
- Posts: 6595
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
- Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14815
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
-
- Posts: 6595
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
- Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14290
- Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
- Location: Newbury, Berkshire
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 6595
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
- Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont
-
- Posts: 1289
- Joined: 15 Jul 2007, 17:02
- Location: uk
- careful_eugene
- Posts: 647
- Joined: 26 Jun 2006, 15:39
- Location: Nottingham UK
Joking and banter aside, be careful with this attitude, 17 years ago 19 men armed with small knives bought the US to a standstill and changed the world forever.vtsnowedin wrote:You can try.kenneal - lagger wrote:Do we get to sack Washington again beforehand?vtsnowedin wrote: Meet you at Yorktown.
Paid up member of the Petite bourgeoisie
-
- Posts: 6595
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
- Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14815
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
It’s never a good idea to boycott elections. Maduro got over 67% of votes cast and the election had 150 foreign observers. Even a US president has praised Venezuela’s electoral system as possibly one of the world’s best.vtsnowedin wrote:With a 32 percent turnout. Yah right!! At least he didn't claim a 99 percent vote. That makes it all good.Little John wrote:He was democratically elected. .
The boycott backfired and the CIA should fúck off.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14815
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
Sourcethere can be no elections under US sanctions. When Nicaraguans voted in 1990, they didn't do so freely. The Bush Sr administration had declared that it would lift the embargo if the opposition candidate won against the Sandinista incumbent, Daniel Ortega.
With the same people in charge of US policy today, it's clear that the point of sanctions is to twist the arm of Venezuelans until they vote the way the US wants. The impact of sanctions has already been devastating, and their tightening into a brutal oil blockade means the situation will only get worse.
If the US and its Venezuelan allies really care about electoral conditions, then they should recognise that there can be no free and fair elections with the threat of continued sanctions or foreign intervention hanging over the heads of voters.
One of the more intelligent articles on US tyranny.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker