And they'll probably use 5G to do it!!! Horror on horror!!Little John wrote:.............Yes, yes, of course. We need more surveillance don't we. You are just gagging for it, aren't you. ......
New coronavirus in/from China
Moderator: Peak Moderation
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14290
- Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
- Location: Newbury, Berkshire
- Contact:
- adam2
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10892
- Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
- Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis
A foolish neighbour was circulating a petition against 5G telephone masts on the grounds that they "fry babies brains"kenneal - lagger wrote:And they'll probably use 5G to do it!!! Horror on horror!!Little John wrote:.............Yes, yes, of course. We need more surveillance don't we. You are just gagging for it, aren't you. ......
They did not appreciate my enquiry as whether butter or olive oil was used for this frying.
Lucky to get 3G around here, 5G would be welcomed by me.
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/ ... lse-alarm/
Germany’s federal government and mainstream media are engaged in damage control after a report that challenges the established Corona narrative leaked from the interior ministry.
Some of the report key passages are:
The dangerousness of Covid-19 was overestimated: probably at no point did the danger posed by the new virus go beyond the normal level.
The people who die from Corona are essentially those who would statistically die this year, because they have reached the end of their lives and their weakened bodies can no longer cope with any random everyday stress (including the approximately 150 viruses currently in circulation).
Worldwide, within a quarter of a year, there has been no more than 250,000 deaths from Covid-19, compared to 1.5 million deaths [25,100 in Germany] during the influenza wave 2017/18.
The danger is obviously no greater than that of many other viruses. There is no evidence that this was more than a false alarm.
A reproach could go along these lines: During the Corona crisis the State has proved itself as one of the biggest producers of Fake News.
So far, so bad. But it gets worse.
The report focuses on the “manifold and heavy consequences of the Corona measures� and warns that these are “grave�.
More people are dying because of state-imposed Corona-measures than they are being killed by the virus.
The reason is a scandal in the making...
Much of that is clearly false by looking at excess death statistics, specifically in hospitals and care homes. They would not "would statistically die this year". Also while there will be some deaths due to the response, the vast majority of excess deaths are in hospitals and care homes, while infected with covid. It's just not true to say "More people are dying because of state-imposed Corona-measures than they are being killed by the virus".
Looks like coronavirus is now being used as a reason to close local cottage hospitals. They were all emptied and closed in anticipation of a coronavirus surge which never happened. And are remaining empty and closed due to anticipated future surges which will never happen.
https://www.dng24.co.uk/cottage-hospita ... nd-closed/
https://www.dng24.co.uk/cottage-hospita ... nd-closed/
-
- Posts: 6595
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
- Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont
We can't know if either of those positions is correct until the end of the year and the final figures are released. In fact the excess deaths caused by the close downs will probably stretch out over several years as it takes time for depression, drug use, and alcoholism to kill it's victims and the lockdowns obviously have increased all three.clv101 wrote:Much of that is clearly false by looking at excess death statistics, specifically in hospitals and care homes. They would not "would statistically die this year". Also while there will be some deaths due to the response, the vast majority of excess deaths are in hospitals and care homes, while infected with covid. It's just not true to say "More people are dying because of state-imposed Corona-measures than they are being killed by the virus".
Indeed, and the reduced deaths from reduced air pollution may end up being the biggest number of the lot.vtsnowedin wrote:We can't know if either of those positions is correct until the end of the year and the final figures are released. In fact the excess deaths caused by the close downs will probably stretch out over several years as it takes time for depression, drug use, and alcoholism to kill it's victims and the lockdowns obviously have increased all three.clv101 wrote:Much of that is clearly false by looking at excess death statistics, specifically in hospitals and care homes. They would not "would statistically die this year". Also while there will be some deaths due to the response, the vast majority of excess deaths are in hospitals and care homes, while infected with covid. It's just not true to say "More people are dying because of state-imposed Corona-measures than they are being killed by the virus".
https://mises.org/power-market/cdc-slas ... -lockdowns
The CDC Slashed the COVID-19 Fatality Rate to a Fraction of Earlier Estimate Used to Justify Lockdowns
In March, the World Health Organization (WHO) was claiming that the fatality rate was a very high 3.4 percent.
Yet as time went on, it became increasingly clear that such high estimates were essentially meaningless because researchers had no idea how many people were actually infected with the disease. Tests were largely being conducted on those with symptoms serious enough to end up in emergency rooms or doctors' offices.
By late April, many researchers were publishing new studies showing that the number of people with the disease was actually much higher than was previously thought. Thus, it became clear that the percentage of people with the disease who died from it suddenly became much smaller.
Now, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has released new estimates suggesting that the real fatality rate is around 0.26 percent.
More track and trace surveillance please. We need to be kept "safe".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8CFASK ... ture=share
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8CFASK ... ture=share
That's a good parallel.clv101 wrote:It's the Millennium bug all over again!Snail wrote:Looks like coronavirus is now being used as a reason to close local cottage hospitals. They were all emptied and closed in anticipation of a coronavirus surge which never happened.
Massive efforts went into updating computers so that they could roll over the millennium date without issue. Everything worked as planned, and Joe Public said "see, there was nothing to worry about, it was a hoax...."
The often spaced out JW explaing who is trying to sabotage Cummings so that Hunt and Starmer can run the show:
https://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2020/05/27 ... will-plan/
https://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2020/05/27 ... will-plan/
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14290
- Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
- Location: Newbury, Berkshire
- Contact:
I quite enjoyed the TV clip of Boris telling Hunt, in answer to a question from Hunt, that the government (of the time with Hunt as Health Minister) had not learned the lessons from the SARS epidemic. Hunt didn't come back with a supplementary question for some reason.fuzzy wrote:The often spaced out JW explaing who is trying to sabotage Cummings so that Hunt and Starmer can run the show .......
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
- UndercoverElephant
- Posts: 13496
- Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
- Location: UK
Erm. I was saying this six weeks ago.Little John wrote:https://mises.org/power-market/cdc-slas ... -lockdowns
The CDC Slashed the COVID-19 Fatality Rate to a Fraction of Earlier Estimate Used to Justify Lockdowns
In March, the World Health Organization (WHO) was claiming that the fatality rate was a very high 3.4 percent.
Yet as time went on, it became increasingly clear that such high estimates were essentially meaningless because researchers had no idea how many people were actually infected with the disease. Tests were largely being conducted on those with symptoms serious enough to end up in emergency rooms or doctors' offices.
By late April, many researchers were publishing new studies showing that the number of people with the disease was actually much higher than was previously thought. Thus, it became clear that the percentage of people with the disease who died from it suddenly became much smaller.
Now, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has released new estimates suggesting that the real fatality rate is around 0.26 percent.