The final bill could be even higher. Leaked Treasury documents suggested the figure this year could be as much as £337bn.
That's just for this year. So for the whole timeframe of the virus, we're probably talking a cost to the UK economy of between half and one trillion pounds.
Looks like Vietnam got it right on Coronavirus. A bit of luck too as not many Chinese visit the place as the two countries are now mortal enemies. Having a dictatorial government helps too but as Russia's experience shows even dictatorial minded places don't always get it right.
Spector estimates that about 200,000 of them are reporting symptoms which have lasted for the duration of the study, which is six weeks. There is good clinical data available for patients who end up in hospital. Thus far the government is not collecting information on those in the community with ostensibly “mild� but often debilitating symptoms – a larger group than those in critical care.
...
Scientific explanations for what is happening are still at an early stage. Lynne Turner-Stokes, professor of rehabilitation medicine at King’s College, says Covid is a “multi-system disease� which can potentially affect any organ. It causes microvascular problems and clots. Lungs, brain, skin, kidneys and the nervous system may be affected. Neurological symptoms can be mild (headache) or severe (confusion, delirium, coma).
UndercoverElephant wrote: Instead they thought they could get away with letting the virus run free while claiming that wasn't actually what they were doing, and went fully down that path. They only stopped when people started talking about genocide or crimes against humanity, and the rest of Europe was clearly following a different path, so they realised they couldn't get away with it after all. But by then it was too late.
So by your reasoning, Sweden will be in the dock in the Hague anytime now?
UndercoverElephant wrote: Instead they thought they could get away with letting the virus run free while claiming that wasn't actually what they were doing, and went fully down that path. They only stopped when people started talking about genocide or crimes against humanity, and the rest of Europe was clearly following a different path, so they realised they couldn't get away with it after all. But by then it was too late.
So by your reasoning, Sweden will be in the dock in the Hague anytime now?
If they end up with a massively high death rate, yes. If not, no. I didn't actually say the original plan was the wrong one, merely that it was politically unsustainable.
UndercoverElephant wrote: Instead they thought they could get away with letting the virus run free while claiming that wasn't actually what they were doing, and went fully down that path. They only stopped when people started talking about genocide or crimes against humanity, and the rest of Europe was clearly following a different path, so they realised they couldn't get away with it after all. But by then it was too late.
So by your reasoning, Sweden will be in the dock in the Hague anytime now?
If they end up with a massively high death rate, yes. If not, no. I didn't actually say the original plan was the wrong one, merely that it was politically unsustainable.
So no reasonable politician could have reasonably contemplated what Sweden has done? and further, deliberately set out to murder members of a national, ethnical, racial or religious group?
Spector estimates that about 200,000 of them are reporting symptoms which have lasted for the duration of the study, which is six weeks. There is good clinical data available for patients who end up in hospital. Thus far the government is not collecting information on those in the community with ostensibly “mild� but often debilitating symptoms – a larger group than those in critical care.
...
Scientific explanations for what is happening are still at an early stage. Lynne Turner-Stokes, professor of rehabilitation medicine at King’s College, says Covid is a “multi-system disease� which can potentially affect any organ. It causes microvascular problems and clots. Lungs, brain, skin, kidneys and the nervous system may be affected. Neurological symptoms can be mild (headache) or severe (confusion, delirium, coma).
This from a friend of mine:
Sharing this for the others who think they've had it and still not quite right. I'm one of those in 60-plus days category. It's weird cos you keep doubting yourself, you think, "I've just lost a bit of fitness." But I get out of breath just walking up a hill, I get out of breath just talking too much, I can't run without chest pain and getting wheezy for the entire day. The dust on the farm right now is making me wheezy. I can't go near smoke. Never had any of this before Covid.
Of course, perspective needed when 100,000s people have died, but it's not a simple case of mild infection, hospitalisation or death. Mild can include people that may suffer long term lung damage. Hopefully it's something that will eventually clear up and leave little trace. It's unknown yet.
Yes a lot of people saw a similiar 'aging' - joints more trouble, fitness loss, me included. Self employed farmers would be a good case study as they can continue with the same work. Everyone else has had a lifestyle change so Heisenberg uncertainty applies.
First we are told we need to keep the complete lock-down because millions would die irrespective of age, morbidity etc etc and anyone who disagrees is a right wing fascist murderer. Obviously. This is a lie.
Then we we are told we need to keep the complete lock down because large numbers of young people are getting it. This is also a lie.
Then we are told we need to keep the lock-down because it might be "killing the kids" despite the fact that (a) Kawasaki disease existed before Covid 19 and (b) the number of kids who are getting this are incredibly rare and (c) there is no proof of a link between the current incidence of Kawasaki disease and Covid 19. This is also most likely a lie. But, at the very least, is a gross exaggeration.
Now, we are being told we need to keep the lock-down because there may be all kinds of "complications" as yet unproven in any statistically verifiable way. More hysterical fear mongering.
Here are some numbers we do know:
5% of all people who get Covid 19 will die in the absence of significant medical intervention. Mostly the elderly and comorbid.
15% of all people who get Covid 19 will get seriously ill and need to go to bed for a few days to a week or so. but will likely not die of it. Again, this 15% is made up of largely the elderly and comorbid
80% of all people who get Covid 19 will recover unproblematically and many of them will not even know they had it.
Last edited by Little John on 16 May 2020, 11:39, edited 2 times in total.
Meanwhile, long awaited operations are being cancelled, those with long-term illnesses which need constant monitoring are having their consultations cancelled and result of medical tests lost in the system.
The young and healthy must be allowed to mix freely in society at this stage of the virus's development so that they are ready for the second stage. If young people don't develop immunity at this stage, then they become as vulnerable as the old are now when it mutates to the next stage.
This is what some of us have now been saying for weeks. But, everybody has been so whipped up into a state of pant shitting hysteria, it is like banging one's head against a brick wall trying to explain this to people. Even on here.