New coronavirus in/from China

Forum for general discussion of Peak Oil / Oil depletion; also covering related subjects

Moderator: Peak Moderation

vtsnowedin
Posts: 6595
Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont

Post by vtsnowedin »

Even the fullest lockdown will fail as the number of "essential workers" is high enough to spread the virus around and past those locked in. When you come out of hiding it will be waiting for you at the doctor's office and the police station and the gas pump. Sooner or later you will be in contact with one of these "essential workers" or one of their family members.
boisdevie
Posts: 460
Joined: 26 Dec 2012, 18:48
Location: N Lancashire

Post by boisdevie »

vtsnowedin wrote:Even the fullest lockdown will fail as the number of "essential workers" is high enough to spread the virus around and past those locked in. When you come out of hiding it will be waiting for you at the doctor's office and the police station and the gas pump. Sooner or later you will be in contact with one of these "essential workers" or one of their family members.
And just about everyone will get it and MOST people will NOT die or need medical intervention which means we killed the economy for no reason.

And no, of course I don't want all old people to die.
User avatar
Mean Mr Mustard II
Posts: 715
Joined: 27 Jan 2020, 17:43
Location: Cambridgeshire's Edge

Post by Mean Mr Mustard II »

Vortex2 wrote:Too many words ...

Some posts here are the size of War and Peace.

Pls could we use links where possible.

Thanks.
https://medium.com/@yurideigin/lab-made ... 6dd7413748
If you made it here by reading rather than scrolling, mad props to you. Hey, even if you scrolled, that’s cool too, and I apologize for the verbosity. I just didn’t anticipate that the rabbit hole would turn out to be a whole underground cave system.
When you're dealing with exponential growth, the time to act is when it feels too early.
User avatar
Mark
Posts: 2573
Joined: 13 Dec 2007, 08:48
Location: NW England

Post by Mark »

boisdevie wrote:
vtsnowedin wrote:Even the fullest lockdown will fail as the number of "essential workers" is high enough to spread the virus around and past those locked in. When you come out of hiding it will be waiting for you at the doctor's office and the police station and the gas pump. Sooner or later you will be in contact with one of these "essential workers" or one of their family members.
And just about everyone will get it and MOST people will NOT die or need medical intervention which means we killed the economy for no reason.

And no, of course I don't want all old people to die.
We're trying to avoid carnage in our Hospitals and Care Homes and prevent a much higher death rate, no ?
To that end, the partial lock-down we have seems to be partially working....?
You say that you don't want all old people to die, but most of your posts read like you're only concerned about your own situation - going back to work, seeing your GF etc.

The economy is not 'killed', but it is going though a period of significant adjustment. Key workers are still going to work, many other workers are working from home, many others are furloughed and will be working again soon. HMG has come up with a range of support packages for companies and the self-employed which should(?) help to bridge the gap. Unfortunately many people have also lost their jobs, and no doubt many more will. Hopefully these people will find their feet again soon - maybe by turning their hand to different careers/jobs...?
Little John

Post by Little John »

Mark wrote:
boisdevie wrote:
vtsnowedin wrote:Even the fullest lockdown will fail as the number of "essential workers" is high enough to spread the virus around and past those locked in. When you come out of hiding it will be waiting for you at the doctor's office and the police station and the gas pump. Sooner or later you will be in contact with one of these "essential workers" or one of their family members.
And just about everyone will get it and MOST people will NOT die or need medical intervention which means we killed the economy for no reason.

And no, of course I don't want all old people to die.
We're trying to avoid carnage in our Hospitals and Care Homes and prevent a much higher death rate, no ?
To that end, the partial lock-down we have seems to be partially working....?
You say that you don't want all old people to die, but most of your posts read like you're only concerned about your own situation - going back to work, seeing your GF etc.

The economy is not 'killed', but it is going though a period of significant adjustment. Key workers are still going to work, many other workers are working from home, many others are furloughed and will be working again soon. HMG has come up with a range of support packages for companies and the self-employed which should(?) help to bridge the gap. Unfortunately many people have also lost their jobs, and no doubt many more will. Hopefully these people will find their feet again soon - maybe by turning their hand to different careers/jobs...?
What is actually happening is hospitals are lying nowhere near capacity leading to people with other illnesses dying of shit they should not be. Meanwhile, elderly people are dying in care homes due to nowhere near the level of biosecurity being applied to hospitals. So, the only people dying are the elderly and those with comorbidities.

You know... the ones who actually die of this illness.

Meanwhile, everyone else, who would not die of this illness are not being allowed to catch it and recover form it.

Doing a great job there.... :lol:
vtsnowedin
Posts: 6595
Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont

Post by vtsnowedin »

Mark wrote:
The economy is not 'killed', but it is going though a period of significant adjustment.
It is early here this morning and though I have pondered that statement for several minutes I can't find words that would describe just how absurd that statement is. Apparently thirty percent unemployment and looming food shortages are just adjustments.
User avatar
Mark
Posts: 2573
Joined: 13 Dec 2007, 08:48
Location: NW England

Post by Mark »

vtsnowedin wrote:
Mark wrote:
The economy is not 'killed', but it is going though a period of significant adjustment.
It is early here this morning and though I have pondered that statement for several minutes I can't find words that would describe just how absurd that statement is. Apparently thirty percent unemployment and looming food shortages are just adjustments.
We've not seen 30% unemployment in the UK - maybe in the US ?
I think we need several months more data to see the full trends on this, but my feeling is that we're not anywhere near that level.

As for food, there seem to be some good outcomes from this crisis....
In the West, we need to start by consuming a lot less - the level of obesity, particularly in the US is horrendous.

We also seem to be wasting less, which is good:
https://inews.co.uk/news/consumer/coron ... ch-2542642
...and for the moment, we seem to have stopped air-freighting in asparagus from Kenya etc.

However, I take your point about some of the projections about food supply.
If this gets a lot worse and results in the whole system collapsing, the UK could be in a very difficult position....
boisdevie
Posts: 460
Joined: 26 Dec 2012, 18:48
Location: N Lancashire

Post by boisdevie »

Mark wrote: You say that you don't want all old people to die, but most of your posts read like you're only concerned about your own situation - going back to work, seeing your GF etc.
I'm a listening volunteer with the Samaritans and will be doing a shift tonight from 11pm till 2am. 3 years ago I donated a kidney to a stranger so please don't even try to suggest I'm some f***ing amoral wanker you judgemental git.
vtsnowedin
Posts: 6595
Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont

Post by vtsnowedin »

US unemployment for March was 16.1 percent but does not include those stilll being paid under the PPP payroll protection program. The numbers are still coming in but if you close all non essential business and send their employees home all those that can't telework are unemployed that day no matter what you call it.
Every sit down restaurant both chain lines and family owned business are closed and will never reopen profitably so will soon be filing bankruptcy as will the owners of the real estate they occupied. Every hotel and vacation spot is closed and will never turn a profit again, All airports and all their staff have taken 70 percent reductions in flights and the need for services. Meat packing plants are closing along with other links in the food distribution system. Farmers are dumping milk and burying eggs and crops. Gas is less then $2.00 a gallon but no one has anywhere to drive to that is open. No domestic oil driller can make money at the current price of oil so are laying off staff.
Significant adjustments indeed!
fuzzy
Posts: 1388
Joined: 29 Nov 2013, 15:08
Location: The Marches, UK

Post by fuzzy »

The UK will be the same, VT. Anyone in the huge hospitality and retail sectors is treading water on gov backstop.

Of the 1.5 million the gov claims are necessary to do nothing, [because the mekon brains say so] maybe 1/2 - 1 million will be below 68 [our brave new world retiring age]. They will be told they are unemployable by the gov, based on made up science, without an antibody test that might show they may have already had batflu, and it was jackshit. Maybe 500000 will receive no welfare if they are a couple with one still working. At least they won't have to visit job centres for a while.

https://metro.co.uk/2020/04/28/number-h ... -12622798/
Last edited by fuzzy on 05 May 2020, 13:18, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Mean Mr Mustard II
Posts: 715
Joined: 27 Jan 2020, 17:43
Location: Cambridgeshire's Edge

Post by Mean Mr Mustard II »

Also good for the straw for sipping bleach.
When you're dealing with exponential growth, the time to act is when it feels too early.
vtsnowedin
Posts: 6595
Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont

Post by vtsnowedin »

fuzzy wrote:The UK will be the same, VT. Anyone in the huge hospitality and retail sectors is treading water on gov backstop.
Eventually the government will need tax revenue to pay for such backstops. In the future I don't see getting on a plane and flying to England to then stand in line to get on a bus to see Stonehenge or Big Ben. You may have some hospitality industry left but it will be a shadow of what it was.
Treading water they may be but their water wings are leaking air and there is a rip tide.
User avatar
Mark
Posts: 2573
Joined: 13 Dec 2007, 08:48
Location: NW England

Post by Mark »

boisdevie wrote:
Mark wrote: You say that you don't want all old people to die, but most of your posts read like you're only concerned about your own situation - going back to work, seeing your GF etc.
I'm a listening volunteer with the Samaritans and will be doing a shift tonight from 11pm till 2am. 3 years ago I donated a kidney to a stranger so please don't even try to suggest I'm some f***ing amoral wanker you judgemental git.
I can only go by what you post, which is all on a theme, namely to totally open the country up, preferably weeks ago
This is something I don't agree with, for the reasons outlined on here many times.

However, now things are starting to look a little more under control, I think there's now an argument for starting a partial/pulsed lifting, but with more controls on Hospitals, Care Homes, Public Transport, Airports etc..
All employers should first have to complete a comprehensive Risk Assessment...
The problem though, is that most RAs will specify the use of PPE, which will massively increase demand and potentially divert it away from Hospitals and Care Homes...

Regarding your other point, I wasn't questioning your morals, just disagreeing with your opinions and what seems to be motivating them (from your own postings).
As you are free to disagree with mine.
User avatar
adam2
Site Admin
Posts: 11040
Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis

Post by adam2 »

vtsnowedin wrote:
fuzzy wrote:The UK will be the same, VT. Anyone in the huge hospitality and retail sectors is treading water on gov backstop.
Eventually the government will need tax revenue to pay for such backstops. In the future I don't see getting on a plane and flying to England to then stand in line to get on a bus to see Stonehenge or Big Ben. You may have some hospitality industry left but it will be a shadow of what it was.
Treading water they may be but their water wings are leaking air and there is a rip tide.
I agree, and speaking of the two attractions specifically mentioned, rather than more generally, there are some excellent video tours available on line, together with TV documentary programmes for those interested in more detail. Travelling thousands of miles to view well known attractions will I suspect become a lot less popular.
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
Post Reply