Financial Crisis
Moderator: Peak Moderation
- RenewableCandy
- Posts: 12777
- Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
- Location: York
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
I'm not calling for less government.DominicJ wrote:The people who predicted this crisis are calling for a massive reduction in the size of government.
Its(sic) there(sic) conclusion, not mine.
Did somebody re-write the laws of maths and physics while I wasn't looking?oilslick wrote:I think the laws of maths, physics and anything else you can think of are calling for a smaller government.
So, did you publish any papers on it?
There were books, published in early 2000 that predicted the sequence of events accuratly and the causes, they said low interest and high government spending, the cure being sensible interest rates and small government.
http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/downc ... e=m&title=
Theres definatly a pattern there
There were books, published in early 2000 that predicted the sequence of events accuratly and the causes, they said low interest and high government spending, the cure being sensible interest rates and small government.
http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/downc ... e=m&title=
Theres definatly a pattern there
I'm a realist, not a hippie
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
The government is responsible for 45% of spending, it will hit 60% this year.Too much private spending.
You are partialy right, the people have overspent as well, however, they did so because the government encouraged them too, via monetary policy, and they did so to a much lesser extent than the government, and they have largely stopped, despite el gordo's pleases that they carry on regardless.
I'm a realist, not a hippie
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
In the world of smilies, the is more appropriate for sarcasm (or just general taking the pish)RenewableCandy wrote:(Warning: I was being sarky. There isn't a Sarky icon so I have to make do with a " " )
(OMG I've turned from the Apostrophe Police to the Emoticons Police)
Olduvai Theory (Updated) (Reviewed)
Easter Island - a warning from history : http://dieoff.org/page145.htm
Easter Island - a warning from history : http://dieoff.org/page145.htm
Where does the government get the money it spends?
Andy Hunt
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
Eternal Sunshine wrote: I wouldn't want to worry you with the truth.
I suppose I was getting at things like
- VAT
- income tax
If we didn't spend anything, people wouldn't be employed and therefore wouldn't have an income to tax, and there would be no VAT.
What government spends is a function of what people spend. That's why in a recession, government has to borrow to finance whatever programmes it wants to fund. Because nobody is spending anything.
But when what the private sector is spending has been borrowed in the first place rather than earned, then government tax revenue is based on consumer debt rather than the real economy.
So government assumptions that government borrowing will eventually be repaid could be wrong, because previous tax revenue turned out to be little more than a money laundering operation.
- VAT
- income tax
If we didn't spend anything, people wouldn't be employed and therefore wouldn't have an income to tax, and there would be no VAT.
What government spends is a function of what people spend. That's why in a recession, government has to borrow to finance whatever programmes it wants to fund. Because nobody is spending anything.
But when what the private sector is spending has been borrowed in the first place rather than earned, then government tax revenue is based on consumer debt rather than the real economy.
So government assumptions that government borrowing will eventually be repaid could be wrong, because previous tax revenue turned out to be little more than a money laundering operation.
Andy Hunt
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
Eternal Sunshine wrote: I wouldn't want to worry you with the truth.
- RenewableCandy
- Posts: 12777
- Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
- Location: York
-
- Posts: 210
- Joined: 23 Oct 2008, 17:51
- Location: NW England
How can you defend anything this lot have done? They've actively encouraged this debt boom, joined in themselves and pretended they were doing good things.biffvernon wrote:Too much private spending.
GB will go down in history as the person who ruined the UK. We will be paying back the debt for 30 years...if we're lucky.
We need to come up with a new plan and adjust to a much lower standard of living, not keep throwing my son's future earning's (if there are any jobs) down the plughole.