Public Banking in Costa Rica: A Remarkable Little-known Model
This raises some interesting topics. For a start, I would strongly believe that these state owned entities were, by their very creation, banned from dealing in "exotic investment vehicles" - or derivatives. This is in complete contrast to the on-going fraud we have operating in this country. The UK banking "industry" is the complete antithesis to this because:According to a 2003 report by the World Bank, the public sector banks dominating Costa Rica’s onshore banking system include three state-owned commercial banks (Banco Nacional, Banco de Costa Rica, and Banco Crédito Agrícola de Cartago) and a special-charter bank called Banco Popular, which in principle is owned by all Costa Rican workers. These banks accounted for 75 percent of total banking deposits in 2003.
In Competition Policies in Emerging Economies: Lessons and Challenges from Central America and Mexico (2008), Claudia Schatan writes that Costa Rica nationalized all of its banks and imposed a monopoly on deposits in 1949. Effectively, only state-owned banks existed in the country after that. The monopoly was loosened in the 1980s and was eliminated in 1995. But the extensive network of branches developed by the public banks and the existence of an unlimited state guarantee on their deposits has made Costa Rica the only country in the region in which public banking clearly predominates.
1) the UK banks are NOT trusted
2) the UK banks are not lending out to SMEs as they should - mainly due to the fact they are sitting on all this QE money to try and deal with the next derivatives implosion, as it will happen. Which will not be pretty.
The Costa Rican's banks' business models described are not that far removed from the old Girobank model either..
PS - you've gotta love the last paragraph
