New coronavirus in/from China
Moderator: Peak Moderation
All I'm trying to model is the size and speed of the curve of infection of the epidemic and also the expected deaths based on the official numbers provided. I am bound to say, thus far, the number of cases each day is mapping onto an unrestricted exponential curve of infection. Indeed, I keep having to revise my model slightly upwards in the light of the data each day.
If we are going to see any beneficial effect on that curve of Johnson's measures, they need to start appearing by, say, 10 days from now. If not, then it's all over in terms of mitigation and we are into the eye of a hurricane
If we are going to see any beneficial effect on that curve of Johnson's measures, they need to start appearing by, say, 10 days from now. If not, then it's all over in terms of mitigation and we are into the eye of a hurricane
- Mean Mr Mustard II
- Posts: 715
- Joined: 27 Jan 2020, 17:43
- Location: Cambridgeshire's Edge
- Mean Mr Mustard II
- Posts: 715
- Joined: 27 Jan 2020, 17:43
- Location: Cambridgeshire's Edge
HMG: 3,983 cases as at 20 March
My improved regression yesterday predicted 4,187 which is within 5% which keeps me happy.
My improved regression using today's data 'predicted' 4,106 which is even better.
R*R = .9976
So still a perfectly exponential climb ....
It's interesting to see how some fitting algorithms seem to do well whilst others are only sort of OK.
My improved regression yesterday predicted 4,187 which is within 5% which keeps me happy.
My improved regression using today's data 'predicted' 4,106 which is even better.
R*R = .9976
So still a perfectly exponential climb ....
It's interesting to see how some fitting algorithms seem to do well whilst others are only sort of OK.
Last edited by Vortex2 on 20 Mar 2020, 18:33, edited 4 times in total.
- adam2
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10911
- Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
- Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis
Indeed, or possibly field hospitals.Mean Mr Mustard II wrote:Remember the training exercise scaffold / tarp structures Adam heard about a few weeks back? Those would be the morgues on the airfields and Army camps.
The armed forces hold stocks of tents and marquees, and civilian supplies can be hired or requisitioned in emergency.
However in a large scale disaster supplies might be insufficient, hence the need to experiment and practice in use of alternatives.
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
- Mean Mr Mustard II
- Posts: 715
- Joined: 27 Jan 2020, 17:43
- Location: Cambridgeshire's Edge
A fair few of us have already met in 'meatspace' and we should plan on doing that - emerging from our bunkers, once all vaccinated, whenever that is.Vortex2 wrote:I think that we need an Ice Cold In Alex ending for all those posting here.
I suggest that any survivors of this horror meet up here for a virtual cold beer on Mothering Sunday 2021.
Put the date in your calendar!
For those of you who don't turn up we will raise a glass to you!
We could maybe even discuss Peak Oil, just like in the old days.
Some levity -
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... -weird-now
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ary-before
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/ ... -isolation
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... -the-world
When you're dealing with exponential growth, the time to act is when it feels too early.
- adam2
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10911
- Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
- Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis
Pubs, bars, restaurants, and cafes are required to close from tonight Friday 20/03/2020.
It is implied that this is from midnight. The PM has appealed for people "not to go out tonight" which implies that pubs ARE allowed to open until midnight tonight.
It is implied that this is from midnight. The PM has appealed for people "not to go out tonight" which implies that pubs ARE allowed to open until midnight tonight.
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
-
- Posts: 6595
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
- Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont
11.5 million using your numbers but yes that is possible or even the current ten percent fatality rate in Italy but that is probably due to differences in counting and progression of the pandemic. But on a per-capita basis your situation is just as bad.Little John wrote:I was looking, today, at your country's numbers V.vtsnowedin wrote:With no real numbers to work with we can jump right into wild A$$&# guesses.
Lets say that the real numbers are about two weeks behind actual cases in the field and that things will progress along the same infection curve as the rest of the world is experiencing. So in two weeks you will officially know how many UK citizens are walking around infected today and that number will be around 160,000.
By the same WAG work and logic the US probably has about 665,000 infected and out and about at present.
Given that 5% of people infected need ICU and, in it's absence, basically die, 5% of 70% (assumed infection total) of your country's population is 16.3 million. Even if only half of that number die, that is a bit biblical.
Best of luck one and all. Stay home stay safe. Don't spread it.
- Lord Beria3
- Posts: 5066
- Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 20:57
- Location: Moscow Russia
- Contact:
Oh yes indeed, it is just as bad here.vtsnowedin wrote:11.5 million using your numbers but yes that is possible or even the current ten percent fatality rate in Italy but that is probably due to differences in counting and progression of the pandemic. But on a per-capita basis your situation is just as bad.Little John wrote:I was looking, today, at your country's numbers V.vtsnowedin wrote:With no real numbers to work with we can jump right into wild A$$&# guesses.
Lets say that the real numbers are about two weeks behind actual cases in the field and that things will progress along the same infection curve as the rest of the world is experiencing. So in two weeks you will officially know how many UK citizens are walking around infected today and that number will be around 160,000.
By the same WAG work and logic the US probably has about 665,000 infected and out and about at present.
Given that 5% of people infected need ICU and, in it's absence, basically die, 5% of 70% (assumed infection total) of your country's population is 16.3 million. Even if only half of that number die, that is a bit biblical.
Best of luck one and all. Stay home stay safe. Don't spread it.
In both countries, capitalism is proving itself to be utterly useless in the face of an existential threat. Johnson, it would seem, is acknowledging that fact slightly faster than Trump and is now enacting significant socialist measures. Which is quite hilarious to witness to be honest.
Last edited by Little John on 20 Mar 2020, 18:58, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6595
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
- Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont
Sad part is that the socialist measures both countries are rushing to put in place will also fail at stopping the virus which can't read political doctrine and cares not how you voted. Only evolution and survival of the fittest will finally bring this virus down to a level we can deal with as like all pathogens it is environmentally unwise to kill all your hosts before you have reproduced and moved on to the next host.