Are Cities Completely Jeffed?

Forum for general discussion of Peak Oil / Oil depletion; also covering related subjects

Moderator: Peak Moderation

fifthcolumn
Posts: 2525
Joined: 22 Nov 2007, 14:07

Post by fifthcolumn »

Vortex wrote:Cities simply HAVE to survive or the game is over.
Yes. Cities falling is effectively equivalent to dieoff.

If the cities go down then we are toast.
User avatar
RogerCO
Posts: 672
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Cornwall, UK

Post by RogerCO »

RenewableCandy wrote:Hmm. York has walls... :D
London has a potential wall - currently known as the M25 mostly. :)
RogerCO
___________________________________
The time for politics is past - now is the time for action.
User avatar
Erik
Posts: 1544
Joined: 21 Sep 2006, 17:17
Location: Spain

Post by Erik »

fifthcolumn wrote:
Vortex wrote:Cities simply HAVE to survive or the game is over.
Yes. Cities falling is effectively equivalent to dieoff.

If the cities go down then we are toast.
What is meant by "survive" though? I'd say that cities cannot stay as they are now, they will have to change, and their populations will have to decline... but lets hope it's a slow transition, otherwise we are indeed toast! (Hey, we're all going to be toast one day anyway, innit?)
"If we don't change our direction, we are likely to wind up where we are headed" (Chinese Proverb)
fifthcolumn
Posts: 2525
Joined: 22 Nov 2007, 14:07

Post by fifthcolumn »

Erik wrote:
fifthcolumn wrote:
Vortex wrote:Cities simply HAVE to survive or the game is over.
Yes. Cities falling is effectively equivalent to dieoff.

If the cities go down then we are toast.
What is meant by "survive" though? I'd say that cities cannot stay as they are now, they will have to change, and their populations will have to decline... but lets hope it's a slow transition, otherwise we are indeed toast! (Hey, we're all going to be toast one day anyway, innit?)
Personally I think that there's no reason we can't have cities with trains, trolley buses, electric local delivery trucks and a sprinkling of electric cars and lots of electric mopeds and zillions of bicycles. That may be a bit different to what we're used to in the west but EXACTLY what cities in the far east are like.
User avatar
Erik
Posts: 1544
Joined: 21 Sep 2006, 17:17
Location: Spain

Re: Are Cities Completely Jeffed?

Post by Erik »

phobos wrote:Erik something you may be interested in :)
I read somewhere that such "wigglers" would not survive at temperatures below -5?C or above 30?C. Temperatures on my roof can range between -7? and 40?C over the year. And my OH says she wants the kitchen worm-free :roll: ... Or was she referring to me? :?
"If we don't change our direction, we are likely to wind up where we are headed" (Chinese Proverb)
Vortex
Posts: 6095
Joined: 16 May 2006, 19:14

Post by Vortex »

One problem with the city situation is ... dare, I say it ... immigration.

Shortages etc could trigger all sorts of mayhem, which might make cities a lot less attractive.

Additionally, will rural communities allow most of their food to be diverted to immigrant communities in the cities?

(They will be FORCED to hand over their crops, as no government can afford to see the cities explode)

Not all aspects of Energy Descent are delightful, fun filled opportunities....
User avatar
UndercoverElephant
Posts: 13496
Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
Location: UK

Post by UndercoverElephant »

Vortex wrote:One problem with the city situation is ... dare, I say it ... immigration.

Shortages etc could trigger all sorts of mayhem, which might make cities a lot less attractive.

Additionally, will rural communities allow most of their food to be diverted to immigrant communities in the cities?

(They will be FORCED to hand over their crops, as no government can afford to see the cities explode)

Not all aspects of Energy Descent are delightful, fun filled opportunities....
Who is going to grow crops if they think the government is going to turn up and take them away? What would be the point in growing them?
fifthcolumn
Posts: 2525
Joined: 22 Nov 2007, 14:07

Post by fifthcolumn »

UndercoverElephant wrote:
Vortex wrote:One problem with the city situation is ... dare, I say it ... immigration.

Shortages etc could trigger all sorts of mayhem, which might make cities a lot less attractive.

Additionally, will rural communities allow most of their food to be diverted to immigrant communities in the cities?

(They will be FORCED to hand over their crops, as no government can afford to see the cities explode)

Not all aspects of Energy Descent are delightful, fun filled opportunities....
Who is going to grow crops if they think the government is going to turn up and take them away? What would be the point in growing them?
Yes, the government. My favourite beast.
What will our friends in government do?
fifthcolumn
Posts: 2525
Joined: 22 Nov 2007, 14:07

Post by fifthcolumn »

Vortex wrote:One problem with the city situation is ... dare, I say it ... immigration.

Shortages etc could trigger all sorts of mayhem, which might make cities a lot less attractive.

Additionally, will rural communities allow most of their food to be diverted to immigrant communities in the cities?

(They will be FORCED to hand over their crops, as no government can afford to see the cities explode)

Not all aspects of Energy Descent are delightful, fun filled opportunities....
If we're going to see shortages here in the west (and that is by no means assured) then there is an alternative to your scenario and that is blockade.

Since we are unarmed here in the UK then it would be fairly easy to ring the cities with troops and simply shoot anybody who crossed the deadline.

If we see a fast crash shortage scenario like you suggest it could come to that.
Vortex
Posts: 6095
Joined: 16 May 2006, 19:14

Post by Vortex »

I assume that the Cuban farmers have to hand over much of their crops .. but as long as they are allowed to keep say 10% they will carry on farming.

A well run - but somewhat unfair - system will work. people will put up with it as long as they get SOMETHING and it is GUARANTEED.

The modern economy is like that: we work 37 hours a week doing stupid things ... and in return we end up with food and a roof over our heads.

Same deal.
fifthcolumn
Posts: 2525
Joined: 22 Nov 2007, 14:07

Post by fifthcolumn »

Vortex wrote:I assume that the Cuban farmers have to hand over much of their crops .. but as long as they are allowed to keep say 10% they will carry on farming.

A well run - but somewhat unfair - system will work. people will put up with it as long as they get SOMETHING and it is GUARANTEED.

The modern economy is like that: we work 37 hours a week doing stupid things ... and in return we end up with food and a roof over our heads.

Same deal.
Yes. The study I read was that the maximum average confiscation people would tolerate is 75%. Over that you get cut my nose off to spite my face retaliation.
User avatar
mikepepler
Site Admin
Posts: 3096
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Rye, UK
Contact:

Post by mikepepler »

RogerCO wrote:
RenewableCandy wrote:Hmm. York has walls... :D
London has a potential wall - currently known as the M25 mostly. :)
I'm sure that's been mentioned in a another thread, in the context of fortifying to keep people IN, rather than OUT. :wink:
User avatar
Jane
Posts: 100
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09

Post by Jane »

Good to hear all the points.

Fifth Column wrote:
Personally I think that there's no reason we can't have cities with trains, trolley buses, electric local delivery trucks and a sprinkling of electric cars and lots of electric mopeds and zillions of bicycles. That may be a bit different to what we're used to in the west but EXACTLY what cities in the far east are like.
Yeh, I often think this, given the rate at which things are currently slowing (touch wood! don't want to speak too soon!) and given how much structural change can occur with the right motivation. However, it's yet to be seen if mitigating social descent is as great a motivator as capital gain has been :roll:


Vortex wrote:
Not all aspects of Energy Descent are delightful, fun filled opportunities....
Don't worry, I'm not that deluded :wink:


clv101 said:
the mothership has landed :wink:
That would simplify things somewhat, eh? But you know me and my Jane-ness! :wink:


Interesting the point about a 1million pop. being most sustainable; bigger cities could well fragment into smaller livable chunks to some extent maybe? Depending on the rate and level of social unrest I guess, and again, the crux of the whole issue, food.
User avatar
clv101
Site Admin
Posts: 10551
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Contact:

Post by clv101 »

I like Vortex?s comment... ?but EXACTLY what cities in the far east are like?. It would be interesting to see some decent, inclusive, data on energy consumption per head in say San Francisco, Chicago, Manchester, Barcelona, Dakar, Mogadishu, Mumbay, Bangkok, Beijing and Tokyo.

All cities, but they must have massively different energy consumptions per head.
fifthcolumn
Posts: 2525
Joined: 22 Nov 2007, 14:07

Post by fifthcolumn »

Jane wrote:Good to hear all the points.

Fifth Column wrote:
Personally I think that there's no reason we can't have cities with trains, trolley buses, electric local delivery trucks and a sprinkling of electric cars and lots of electric mopeds and zillions of bicycles. That may be a bit different to what we're used to in the west but EXACTLY what cities in the far east are like.
Yeh, I often think this, given the rate at which things are currently slowing (touch wood! don't want to speak too soon!) and given how much structural change can occur with the right motivation. However, it's yet to be seen if mitigating social descent is as great a motivator as capital gain has been :roll:
We don't need to mitigate anything or even get the government involved.
The recession and rising prices by themselves will FORCE people to stop using their cars.
When the chaff is weeded out of the economy over the next five years the surviving businesses will start to hire again.
In the meantime people will have learned to live off of rapidly depreciating dole money and growing vegetables by themselves.
If they were smart enough to have bought a bike before they go skint then they will use a bike, otherwise they will walk.

No grand plan is needed for this to happen. It will happen all by itself. I take public transport as much as I can and I get funny looks by my colleagues. This contract I have to take the car because I'm doing a massive commute but it will be over in july.

I get a perverse sense of satisfaction out of it I have to say.
A lot of the oversized car driving wankers will be hoofing it.
BWAHAHAHAHAHA.

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
Post Reply