Search found 4 matches
- 21 Dec 2011, 14:43
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Thoughts on 2012
- Replies: 142
- Views: 24638
Why would it mean financial losses for them? If they generate electricity for free, with no carbon emissions, they can sell it to the grid for 5p per kwh. Average usage is what, 30gw? Thats £13bn in pure profit, just from the UK Not if BP owns it, it can simply refuse to sell the technology, and ma...
- 21 Dec 2011, 01:27
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Thoughts on 2012
- Replies: 142
- Views: 24638
I found this online the other day - 2400 pgs devoted to 'free energy devices' http://www.free-energy-info.com/PJKBook.html I haven't had a chance to really go through it, but it's a compilation of any devices that have ever managed (or claimed to manage) a COP > 1. Much of Tesla's work is covered - ...
- 21 Dec 2011, 01:01
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Thoughts on 2012
- Replies: 142
- Views: 24638
If BP had the ability to generate mains electricity at virtualy no cost, why would it waste all that effort digging for oil and appologising for spilling some? Why wouldnt the Soviet Union have carried on Teslas work? Or China? Or France? Or India? Or South Africa? Or Brazil? Or Vanatu for that mat...
- 20 Dec 2011, 15:40
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Thoughts on 2012
- Replies: 142
- Views: 24638
Slightly off topic but thought of it as I read through the thread. Suppose that the conspiracy theorists are right in claims that oil companies have at times suppressed other forms of energy that have threatened their dominance of the energy market. Maybe what we see now is a period where they placa...