Labour Party Watch

What can we do to change the minds of decision makers and people in general to actually do something about preparing for the forthcoming economic/energy crises (the ones after this one!)?

Moderator: Peak Moderation

Post Reply
AutomaticEarth
Posts: 823
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:09 am

Labour Party Watch

Post by AutomaticEarth »

Are Labour about to lurch to the left, and if so, is this really a bad thing?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politic ... -live.html
johnhemming2
Posts: 2159
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2015 10:01 pm

Post by johnhemming2 »

Bad thing for whom?

At the time when the wheels are falling off Syriza and Podemos, Labour ally themselves with Syriza and Podemos.
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18539
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 11:09 am
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

It's wheels falling off the planet we need to worry about. And the right wing are undoing the nuts.
johnhemming2
Posts: 2159
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2015 10:01 pm

Post by johnhemming2 »

The I would think the question as to the electability of a left wing opposition might concern you.
Little John
Posts: 8549
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:07 am
Location: UK

Re: Labour Party Watch

Post by Little John »

AutomaticEarth wrote:Are Labour about to lurch to the left, and if so, is this really a bad thing?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politic ... -live.html
ooooohhh

"lurch"

not a nice word is it...... :lol:

Meanwhile, our very own Mr Cameron has been using words like "home front" when launching his new "blame the darkies/towel-heads (insert your scapegoat of choice here)" offensive.

The propaganda front is certainly hotting up
AutomaticEarth
Posts: 823
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:09 am

Post by AutomaticEarth »

not a nice word is it...... Laughing
Alright, move to the left then :lol:

My point was really whether Labour was looking to align themselves more the SNP etc, as the centre ground seemed not be a very good place for them at the moment.
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14621
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:36 pm
Location: Hou�sʇlʎ' ᴉʇ,s ɹ��llʎ uoʇ �oɹʇɥ ʇɥ� �ɟɟoɹʇ' pou,ʇ �ʌ�u qoʇɥ�ɹ˙

Post by emordnilap »

It'll be temporary. They have to face the corporate behemoth that is really in charge.

It's going to take much, much more than a change of face in a minor political party to protect us from climate change, pollution and resource depletion.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
johnhemming2
Posts: 2159
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2015 10:01 pm

Post by johnhemming2 »

The corporate behemoth is often called mathematics.
3rdRock

Post by 3rdRock »

The Labour Party and the LibDems for that matter, are facing a very bleak existence for decades to come.

The Tories have successfully convinced a gullible public (via repeated MSM articles and programs) that the unemployed, the sick and the disadvantaged are responsible for a financial crisis which we all know, was actually engineered by the banks and corporations.

It is precisely because the public at large have unfortunately bought into Osborne's mantra, that any left of centre or socialist opposition finds itself out in the cold.

It pains me to say it, but the likes of Harriet Harman are increasingly representative of a new breed of aspirational Labour Party supporters who have become disillusioned with traditional party values.

This trend will only be reversed when the sheeple wake up to the fact that corporations now control every aspect of their lives and have successfully reversed the hard won, working class gains that have been made during the past 100 years or so. Don't hold your breath.

As western economies go into further decline, for all of the reasons which we have continually aired on this forum, the truth may begin to dawn on the public that they have been drawn into a 'game show' from which there is no escape. By that time, any viable opposition party will have torn itself apart and completely lost sight of any core values.

Welcome to the future - it doesn't look bright. :(
User avatar
PS_RalphW
Posts: 5805
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 11:09 am
Location: Cambridge

Post by PS_RalphW »

johnhemming2 wrote:The corporate behemoth is often called mathematics.
As long as 30 years ago it was obvious to me that the difference between science and economics was that scientists try to fit their mathematical models to the physical world, whilst economists try to fit the physical world to their mathematical models.
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14621
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:36 pm
Location: Hou�sʇlʎ' ᴉʇ,s ɹ��llʎ uoʇ �oɹʇɥ ʇɥ� �ɟɟoɹʇ' pou,ʇ �ʌ�u qoʇɥ�ɹ˙

Post by emordnilap »

3rdRock wrote:Welcome to the future - it doesn't look bright. :(
There is a vast amount the individual can do - and live a fulfilling, exciting, contented active life - but it doesn't fit in with what people have been conditioned to expect; laziness plays a major part too.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
3rdRock

Post by 3rdRock »

emordnilap wrote:
3rdRock wrote:Welcome to the future - it doesn't look bright. :(
There is a vast amount the individual can do - and live a fulfilling, exciting, contented active life - but it doesn't fit in with what people have been conditioned to expect; laziness plays a major part too.
Agreed. I'm in my early sixties, retired, financially independent, active and in good health.

However, my overriding concern is for the next and subsequent generations. They've been handed a poisoned chalice, of our making, from which there will be little chance of escape. Their aspirations for career, housing, independence and quality healthcare are unlikely to be met.

On a more selfish note, it also troubles me that their dissatisfaction will start to overflow and impact on my life. I'm a baby boomer - I'll be to blame!
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18539
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 11:09 am
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

3rdRock wrote: The Tories have successfully convinced a gullible public
Let's not forget that they only got 24% of the electorate to vote for them.
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18539
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 11:09 am
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

PS_RalphW wrote:
johnhemming2 wrote:The corporate behemoth is often called mathematics.
As long as 30 years ago it was obvious to me that the difference between science and economics was that scientists try to fit their mathematical models to the physical world, whilst economists try to fit the physical world to their mathematical models.
Varoufakis (to stray into another discussion) points out that he was a statistician, not an economist. He was very critical of much that happened in university economics departments and set about, with others, to make changes. Changes have happened, which is why academic economics is not what it used to be.
User avatar
UndercoverElephant
Posts: 11162
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:00 am
Location: south east England

Post by UndercoverElephant »

johnhemming2 wrote:The corporate behemoth is often called mathematics.
It's a corporate behemoth. Mathematics is unavoidable. There is nothing unavoidable about the pseudo-capitalist corporate kleptocracy that currently runs Planet Earth.
Post Reply