Brexit process

Discussion of the latest Peak Oil news (please also check the Website News area below)

Moderator: Peak Moderation

User avatar
clv101
Site Admin
Posts: 8773
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 11:09 am
Contact:

Post by clv101 »

Can we try and keep this thread just to Brexit, and use the election thread for more general posts.
vtsnowedin
Posts: 6594
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 10:14 pm
Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont

Post by vtsnowedin »

:? Is not this election primarily about Brexit?
User avatar
UndercoverElephant
Posts: 11169
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:00 am
Location: south east England

Post by UndercoverElephant »

vtsnowedin wrote::? Is not this election primarily about Brexit?
No. The tories would very much like it to be primarily about brexit, but for the Labour Party and many voters it is a golden opportunity to change British politics in a major way, by destroying the tory party as we know it. Last night in the big head-to-head debate, Johnson continually tried to answer every question, on every topic, by refering back to brexit, and it was looking pretty stupid by the end. If he continues that tactic, it will backfire on him.

If the tories do not win a majority, they will permanently split over Europe. They could be out of power for a generation.
Last edited by UndercoverElephant on Wed Nov 20, 2019 10:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
vtsnowedin
Posts: 6594
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 10:14 pm
Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont

Post by vtsnowedin »

With all your four party coalition governments has any one party actually been "In Power" in this last generation?
User avatar
clv101
Site Admin
Posts: 8773
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 11:09 am
Contact:

Post by clv101 »

vtsnowedin wrote:With all your four party coalition governments has any one party actually been "In Power" in this last generation?
There's only been 6-7 yrs of coalition government since the 70s.
Little John
Posts: 8549
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:07 am
Location: UK

Post by Little John »

UndercoverElephant wrote:
vtsnowedin wrote::? Is not this election primarily about Brexit?
No. The tories would very much like it to be primarily about brexit, but for the Labour Party.....
Yes it is. Though people like you would very much like it not to be
Little John
Posts: 8549
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:07 am
Location: UK

Post by Little John »

clv101 wrote:
vtsnowedin wrote:With all your four party coalition governments has any one party actually been "In Power" in this last generation?
There's only been 6-7 yrs of coalition government since the 70s.
All governments are coalitions because all political parties are coalitions.
User avatar
clv101
Site Admin
Posts: 8773
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 11:09 am
Contact:

Post by clv101 »

Thought occurred to me today. Assuming the majority of voters still want to leave the EU, then Corbyn's 2nd referendum might be the best way to do so.

With Johnson, he gets his withdrawal agreement through in a matter of weeks but passing the withdrawal agreement is only the start of the process, not the end. We then enter the transition period (with its inevitable extensions) while we negotiate the 'future relationship' and trade deals. This will take *years* and not provide much more certainly than we have now and continue to be frustrated be those not wanting to leave. It's misleading of Johnson to suggest he can offer any finality to the process. Corbyn's 2nd referendum (assuming it was to leave) involves a six month delay to this process, but ensures a much smoother process as following a 2nd leave vote Brexit opposition would be *greatly* reduced following a 2nd vote.
Little John
Posts: 8549
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:07 am
Location: UK

Post by Little John »

The debate was had and the debate was won by Leave in 2016. What any future trading relationship is between the UK and the EU or anywhere else is a separate issue to the central one of the democratic sovereignty of this country's borders, judiciary and legislature which, to repeat, was democratically settled in the 2016 referendum, no matter how much or for how long anti-democrats try to pretend they are one and the same and no matter how much people like you attempt to normalize that pretense.
Last edited by Little John on Thu Nov 21, 2019 6:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Little John
Posts: 8549
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:07 am
Location: UK

Post by Little John »

https://www.spiked-online.com/2019/11/2 ... ul-idiots/

Neoliberalism’s useful idiots

Corbynistas pose as radical and yet they’re campaigning day and night to keep us in the capitalist machine that is the EU.


I wish people would stop saying Labour’s Brexit policy is confusing. It is actually incredibly straightforward. Labour will kill Brexit. It will block the enactment of the largest democratic vote in UK history and ensure that we do not leave the EU in any meaningful way. It could not be clearer: Labour will betray millions of its working-class voters, its own history of Euroscepticism, and the values of Jeremy Corbyn’s own hero Tony Benn, by subverting British democracy and keeping us in the EU against the people’s will.

Anyone who doubts this – or anyone who is still, inexplicably, confused about Labour Brexit’s policy – only needed to listen to Crobyn’s comments at the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) on Monday. Corbyn first assured the assembled capitalists that he is not anti-business. Then he assured them that if he were prime minister, no harm would come to their beloved neoliberal institution, the European Union. Corbyn essentially promised the gathered bosses that he would override the stupid plebs’ democratic wishes and keep Britain entangled in the EU.

He said Labour’s policy is to get a good Brexit deal with the EU and then put it to the people in a confirmatory vote – otherwise known as a second referendum. This referendum would, in his words, be a choice between the ‘sensible deal’ struck by Labour and fully remaining in the EU. That ‘sensible deal’, by the way, would include ‘a customs union, close Single Market relationship, and guarantees of rights, standards and protections’. So we’d have a choice between remaining and… remaining. A customs union, Single Market links, and EU-guaranteed rights and standards – that is, immovable EU regulations – do not not add up to Leave. By any stretch of the imagination. With complete contempt for the democratic will, and the basic principle of democratic choice, a Labour government would say to us: ‘You can stay in the EU or you can stay in the EU. It’s your choice.’

This is not confusing. Labour would pursue a backroom coup against Brexit. It would not only renege on the democratic vote to leave – it would then remove the option of leaving entirely from the ballot paper in a second referendum. It would deprive the British people of the thing that the largest number of us in the democratic history of this country called for: a break from the EU. Labour MPs, activists and bureaucrats would engage in a bloodless coup against the people’s will.

There are so many things wrong with Labour’s Brexit policy. It is anti-democratic. It is deeply dishonest, presenting the suppression of the people’s will as a ‘people’s vote’. It is an astonishing about-face by Jeremy Corbyn, who has been Eurosceptic his entire adult life, and who in fact has mocked the EU’s tyrannical tendency to force dissenting electorates to vote again if they ever dare to oppose EU diktat. That Corbyn himself is now leading the charge for a second referendum represents one of the most shameful abandonments of political principle in recent British history.

Labour’s determination to keep us in the EU, or intimately tied to the EU, also shatters the party’s pretence of radicalism. So much of what the Corbyn-led Labour Party wants to do, including monopolising via nationalisation the broadband market, would be forbidden under EU rules. The EU is a nakedly neoliberal body. As Tony Benn said, ‘The EU has the only constitution in the world committed to capitalism’. He said: ‘It destroys the prospect of socialism in Europe.’ Remember that next time you see middle-class Corbynistas campaigning in the streets, with their fists raised, secretly loving dim right-wingers’ description of their ‘free broadband’ policy as ‘broadband communism’: these people are campaigning to preserve the UK’s relationship with the only institution on earth that is constitutionally committed to capitalism and which is so disgusted by socialism that it effectively makes it illegal.

These are lefties for neoliberalism. Whether it’s Owen Jones acting as Labour’s unpaid media spokesman or Ash ‘I’m literally a communist’ Sarkar beating the streets for Labour votes – these increasingly ridiculous people are campaigning for a party whose policy is to overthrow a strongly working-class revolt against neoliberalism and to keep the UK beholden to Brussels’ rotten capitalistic rules. Revolutionaries? They’re counter-revolutionaries. Socialists? They’re capitalism’s useful idiots. Pro working-class? They are overthrowing millions of working-class votes and trying to ensure that the British working classes, and the rest of the UK, remain subservient to ruthless EU neoliberalism. These people claim they want to overthrow capitalism and yet as soon as millions of ordinary Brits demand a break from the globalist EU they’re weeping into their almond-milk macchiatos. ‘Is this fascism?!’, they cry when the people of Britain raise their voices against EU neoliberalism, bourgeois buffoons that they are.

The only red in Corbyn’s Labour Party is its idiotic devotion to an EU neoliberalism that is red in tooth and claw.
RevdTess
Posts: 2976
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 11:09 am
Location: Newquay

Post by RevdTess »

While I approve any move against capitalist neo-liberalism, we mustn't forget that the Tories embody this far more completely than anyone else. They dream of making the UK into Singapore-in-the-North-Sea, and we have to be ready to fight this once the EU is no longer a political anchor. Leaving the EU gives great freedom but it could go either way and we could end up with something much worse. I mean, just look at what Trump's been doing.
User avatar
UndercoverElephant
Posts: 11169
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:00 am
Location: south east England

Post by UndercoverElephant »

Little John wrote:
UndercoverElephant wrote:
vtsnowedin wrote::? Is not this election primarily about Brexit?
No. The tories would very much like it to be primarily about brexit, but for the Labour Party.....
Yes it is. Though people like you would very much like it not to be
Yougov poll today had the NHS overtaking brexit as the most important issue.
User avatar
Mark
Posts: 1370
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:48 am
Location: NW England

Post by Mark »

RevdTess wrote:While I approve any move against capitalist neo-liberalism, we mustn't forget that the Tories embody this far more completely than anyone else. They dream of making the UK into Singapore-in-the-North-Sea, and we have to be ready to fight this once the EU is no longer a political anchor. Leaving the EU gives great freedom but it could go either way and we could end up with something much worse. I mean, just look at what Trump's been doing.
Exactly.
But the other parties have major flaws too....
Am I weird to want a hung parliament, hopefully leading to a fundamental rethink of our political systems ?
I'm not a LD, but ideally moving us towards something more proportional ?
Or am I in cloud cuckoo land ?
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14625
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:36 pm
Location: Hou�sʇlʎ' ᴉʇ,s ɹ��llʎ uoʇ �oɹʇɥ ʇɥ� �ɟɟoɹʇ' pou,ʇ �ʌ�u qoʇɥ�ɹ˙

Post by emordnilap »

Mark wrote:
RevdTess wrote:While I approve any move against capitalist neo-liberalism, we mustn't forget that the Tories embody this far more completely than anyone else. They dream of making the UK into Singapore-in-the-North-Sea, and we have to be ready to fight this once the EU is no longer a political anchor. Leaving the EU gives great freedom but it could go either way and we could end up with something much worse. I mean, just look at what Trump's been doing.
Exactly.
But the other parties have major flaws too....
Am I weird to want a hung parliament, hopefully leading to a fundamental rethink of our political systems ?
I'm not a LD, but ideally moving us towards something more proportional ?
Or am I in cloud cuckoo land ?
No. There are many electoral systems, as we all know. FPTP is not the most common. See here.
Proportional representation is the most widely used electoral system for national legislatures, with the parliaments of over eighty countries elected by various forms of the system.
Sortition would be my preference.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
fuzzy
Posts: 1388
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2013 3:08 pm
Location: The Marches, UK

Post by fuzzy »

Pat on brexit, with his usual sanity:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_ajM-jcmnU
Post Reply