Rail fares to rise by 5.9% from January

Our transport is heavily oil-based. What are the alternatives?

Moderator: Peak Moderation

User avatar
DominicJ
Posts: 4387
Joined: 18 Nov 2008, 14:34
Location: NW UK

Post by DominicJ »

Feather
Rail has never profitably moved people
Costs have always been greater than ticket sales and required subsidy.

Rail is great for moving cargo, not people.

A few exceptions exist, the longer the distance, the more chance of it breaking even.
I'm a realist, not a hippie
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin
Posts: 14290
Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Contact:

Post by kenneal - lagger »

Perhaps if car drivers had to pay the full cost of road building and maintenance....
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
User avatar
RenewableCandy
Posts: 12777
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
Location: York

Post by RenewableCandy »

...and prangs and injuries and repair of lungs and... (only joking!)
Soyez réaliste. Demandez l'impossible.
Stories
The Price of Time
SleeperService
Posts: 1104
Joined: 02 May 2011, 23:35
Location: Nottingham UK

Post by SleeperService »

DominicJ wrote:Feather
Rail has never profitably moved people
Costs have always been greater than ticket sales and required subsidy.

Rail is great for moving cargo, not people.

A few exceptions exist, the longer the distance, the more chance of it breaking even.
Rail could be perfect for cargo if the loading gauge was altered to allow easier container movement or proper loading facilities were built. Without that it'll struggle. As a lorry driver I'd be much happier doing shorter runs.

Rail could be better than internal flights if a full plan of high speed lines was built, we're very similar to Japan and their system seems to work OK.

Surely the best big picture would be long distance people on HS rail, cargo on current network with short distance people, roads for short cargo and local people. A lot fewer internal flights. Works for me :D
Scarcity is the new black
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin
Posts: 14290
Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Contact:

Post by kenneal - lagger »

High speed rail uses more fuel than a fully loaded plane. The air resistance is much greater at ground level than at 35,000 ft. We should stick to fast rail or go to Maglev which has less friction and is more fuel efficient. As Mobbsey has asked, why do we bother about saving a few minutes in travel time. Better to use that time profitably.
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
User avatar
DominicJ
Posts: 4387
Joined: 18 Nov 2008, 14:34
Location: NW UK

Post by DominicJ »

SS
Pretty much yeah.
Trains are, or should be, a great way to get from Glasgow to London on a certain day.
But they are an extremely poor way of moving two miles at a certain minute.

A network of 20 or so cargo terminals, that shifted ISO boxes would probably work, but rail networks have nailed themselves to providing commuter services, which only exists for two hours twice a day.

A Train from Manchester to Costa Del Sol?
I'm a realist, not a hippie
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin
Posts: 14290
Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Contact:

Post by kenneal - lagger »

I looked at going to Greece by train a few years ago and it would have taken nearly two days and cost over £400. That oes include a ferry from Italy to Greece.
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14814
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

kenneal - lagger wrote:I looked at going to Greece by train a few years ago and it would have taken nearly two days and cost over £400. That oes include a ferry from Italy to Greece.
That sounds fairly reasonable. And fun.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
User avatar
DominicJ
Posts: 4387
Joined: 18 Nov 2008, 14:34
Location: NW UK

Post by DominicJ »

You can fly for £40....
I'm a realist, not a hippie
User avatar
clv101
Site Admin
Posts: 10556
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Contact:

Post by clv101 »

kenneal - lagger wrote:I looked at going to Greece by train a few years ago and it would have taken nearly two days and cost over £400. That oes include a ferry from Italy to Greece.
I went to Italy by train a few months ago. It was about £350 return. That included return trains from Bristol to London, from London to Paris, to Paris to Verona (sleeper), from Verona to Bolzano and Bolzano to Merano. It took pretty much bang on 24 hours door to door. It stated with a very civilised train from Bristol at noon, and I was in the Alps in time for lunch the following day. On the return leg we left a few hours earlier than we needed and had a nice evening in Verona before getting the sleeper back to Paris.

Flying would only have worked out around £100 cheaper, and was virtually impossible to do in a day. The only way to do it in a day was to get something like a 6am flight from Stansted. Which would mean leaving Bristol before 4am!
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14814
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

clv101 wrote:
kenneal - lagger wrote:I looked at going to Greece by train a few years ago and it would have taken nearly two days and cost over £400. That oes include a ferry from Italy to Greece.
I went to Italy by train a few months ago. It was about £350 return. That included return trains from Bristol to London, from London to Paris, to Paris to Verona (sleeper), from Verona to Bolzano and Bolzano to Merano. It took pretty much bang on 24 hours door to door. It stated with a very civilised train from Bristol at noon, and I was in the Alps in time for lunch the following day. On the return leg we left a few hours earlier than we needed and had a nice evening in Verona before getting the sleeper back to Paris.
Half a holiday is the travelling. The above sounds reasonable and fun again.

Of course, you could give Michael O'Leary yet more money to trash the planet with. Flying sounds 'cheap' compared to travelling by train but of course you have both journeys to pay for, with all the added extras and surcharges, you can only take a small amount of luggage, you have to pay for trips to and from airports, etc etc and you're not paying for even the tiniest fraction of your impact on the environment, nor your taking into account your support of an ultimately stupid way of shifting bodies round the planet.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
re
Posts: 152
Joined: 13 Jun 2008, 14:44
Location: South Wales
Contact:

Post by re »

My girlfriend and I went to Greece in September by train and ferry. It cost £232 each return and was a fantastic trip. Met lovely people along the way. And we got the chance to see Paris and Venice on the way.
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14814
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

re wrote:My girlfriend and I went to Greece in September by train and ferry. It cost £232 each return and was a fantastic trip. Met lovely people along the way. And we got the chance to see Paris and Venice on the way.
<jealousy>
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
User avatar
RenewableCandy
Posts: 12777
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
Location: York

Post by RenewableCandy »

emordnilap wrote: Of course, you could give Michael O'Leary yet more money to trash the planet with. Flying sounds 'cheap' compared to travelling by train but of course you have both journeys to pay for, with all the added extras and surcharges, you can only take a small amount of luggage, you have to pay for trips to and from airports, etc etc and you're not paying for even the tiniest fraction of your impact on the environment, nor your taking into account your support of an ultimately stupid way of shifting bodies round the planet.
Quite.
Soyez réaliste. Demandez l'impossible.
Stories
The Price of Time
User avatar
DominicJ
Posts: 4387
Joined: 18 Nov 2008, 14:34
Location: NW UK

Post by DominicJ »

Half a holiday is the travelling.
I agree
99.99% of the population doesnt.

You can get a two week all inclusive for what some of you are suggesting people should spend just on the transport.
I'm a realist, not a hippie
Post Reply