What should the Govt do first?? (when TSHTF)
Moderator: Peak Moderation
What should the Govt do first?? (when TSHTF)
I've been wondering a bit lately, that when TSHTF, the Govt will have to institute some very radical proposals to stave off the worst... or at least try to stave off a fast crash descending into chaos.
Now, the very good people here seem to have some brilliant ideas on all things Peaky, so I was wondering, if you were in the Govt, and facing an impending fast crash scenario, what 3 things would you say should be done, by a Govt (laws, actions, advice etc) Given that if nothing is done, or the wrong things are done, or even the right things but too slowly or late, then things descend into a fast crash situation rapidly.
Mobilise the military stationed in the UK and I'd suggest an immediate recall of all military personal abroad. There's no point in having troops abroad when the crisis is at home. The troops brought home will be needed to retain order for as long as is possible, giving time to bring in any other plans.
All fuel to be rationed. Priority given to essential transport such emergency vehicles and public transport. No priority given to private vehicles (or ration fuel) Public transport not to move unless 90% full. (the time-tables will have to be ripped up)
Emergency broadcasts on all channels of useful info on how to collect rainwater, treat water for storage. Basically, Ray Mears type stuff that might help some people find and store food and water after the descent.
I'm not saying any of the above are "right". Just my personal view on the 3 things needed that might help in a fast crash. I'm sure others have even better ideas.... and it's such a wide ranging "top 3 things" that it's quite daunting deciding what should be done initially. I almost put in as 1 of my top 3 - "suspension of profit" .. as a crisis drives up costs and people will seek to profit from scarcity, but I don't think in a small time-scale you could institute or police that policy, or indeed change people's mindset to not profiteer from a crisis.
SO! What's you're top 3 things you'd do?
Now, the very good people here seem to have some brilliant ideas on all things Peaky, so I was wondering, if you were in the Govt, and facing an impending fast crash scenario, what 3 things would you say should be done, by a Govt (laws, actions, advice etc) Given that if nothing is done, or the wrong things are done, or even the right things but too slowly or late, then things descend into a fast crash situation rapidly.
Mobilise the military stationed in the UK and I'd suggest an immediate recall of all military personal abroad. There's no point in having troops abroad when the crisis is at home. The troops brought home will be needed to retain order for as long as is possible, giving time to bring in any other plans.
All fuel to be rationed. Priority given to essential transport such emergency vehicles and public transport. No priority given to private vehicles (or ration fuel) Public transport not to move unless 90% full. (the time-tables will have to be ripped up)
Emergency broadcasts on all channels of useful info on how to collect rainwater, treat water for storage. Basically, Ray Mears type stuff that might help some people find and store food and water after the descent.
I'm not saying any of the above are "right". Just my personal view on the 3 things needed that might help in a fast crash. I'm sure others have even better ideas.... and it's such a wide ranging "top 3 things" that it's quite daunting deciding what should be done initially. I almost put in as 1 of my top 3 - "suspension of profit" .. as a crisis drives up costs and people will seek to profit from scarcity, but I don't think in a small time-scale you could institute or police that policy, or indeed change people's mindset to not profiteer from a crisis.
SO! What's you're top 3 things you'd do?
Learn to whittle now... we need a spaceship!
- UndercoverElephant
- Posts: 13523
- Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
- Location: UK
Re: What should the Govt do first?? (when TSHTF)
My #1 suggestion: Get out of the EU agricultural/fishery system, even if this means leaving the EU completely. It would be better to remain in the EU with a completely re-invented agricutural/fishery system.postie wrote:I've been wondering a bit lately, that when TSHTF, the Govt will have to institute some very radical proposals to stave off the worst... or at least try to stave off a fast crash descending into chaos.
Now, the very good people here seem to have some brilliant ideas on all things Peaky, so I was wondering, if you were in the Govt, and facing an impending fast crash scenario, what 3 things would you say should be done, by a Govt (laws, actions, advice etc) Given that if nothing is done, or the wrong things are done, or even the right things but too slowly or late, then things descend into a fast crash situation rapidly.
Once in control of our own fisheries the next thing is to implement a system of regulation which avoids all bycatch (fisherman must take back to port everything edible they take from the water, not just what fetches the best price). The system would also have to be designed so that fish stocks will increase year on year (not just stabilise).
You might want "abroad" to include British bases in Germany, but otherwise I agree with this one.Mobilise the military stationed in the UK and I'd suggest an immediate recall of all military personal abroad. There's no point in having troops abroad when the crisis is at home. The troops brought home will be needed to retain order for as long as is possible, giving time to bring in any other plans.
That would probably just terrify people, not that I'm disagreeing...Emergency broadcasts on all channels of useful info on how to collect rainwater, treat water for storage. Basically, Ray Mears type stuff that might help some people find and store food and water after the descent.
-
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: 17 Oct 2009, 11:40
- Location: South Bernicia
- Contact:
Re: What should the Govt do first?? (when TSHTF)
Would staying or leaving the EU make any difference? I would have thought that, when tough times come, compliance with bureaucracy will go out the window (inc. quotas). Everyone and their mother will be fishing in UK waters unless there are gunboats patrolling everywhere. Presumably EU agricultural subsidies will slump.UndercoverElephant wrote:My #1 suggestion: Get out of the EU agricultural/fishery system, even if this means leaving the EU completely. It would be better to remain in the EU with a completely re-invented agricutural/fishery system.
Would I be right in thinking that, officially, North Sea oil has to be shared with the other members in times of emergency?
-
- Posts: 1324
- Joined: 05 Mar 2010, 14:40
What the government should do:
Be honest about the scale of the problems. Support through grants, reduction of bureaucracy, and help in-kind, the introduction of measures to relocalise the economy. Ensure that some form of distribution that gives everyone a minimum is put in place.
What it will do:
Deny anything is wrong whilst quietly preparing their own parachute. Enable themselves and their pals to make a killing on the turmoil. Withdraw all forms of support from the north, north-east, and midlands, writing off whole parts of the country to devolved anarchy, and ensure that the surviving state resources are deployed in keeping them and their pals safe.
Be honest about the scale of the problems. Support through grants, reduction of bureaucracy, and help in-kind, the introduction of measures to relocalise the economy. Ensure that some form of distribution that gives everyone a minimum is put in place.
What it will do:
Deny anything is wrong whilst quietly preparing their own parachute. Enable themselves and their pals to make a killing on the turmoil. Withdraw all forms of support from the north, north-east, and midlands, writing off whole parts of the country to devolved anarchy, and ensure that the surviving state resources are deployed in keeping them and their pals safe.
"Tea's a good drink - keeps you going"
All remaining state resources will be flogged off, at pennies in the pound if necessary, to maintain Britain’s 'non negotiable' lifestyles for another 5 minutes – and to continue to pay debt and bonuses until it becomes quite impossible. The public are likely to accept it because most will assume the problems are temporary and we’re only “getting over a bad patch”. It isn’t going to be like the breakdown of the Soviet Union but some of the outcomes might appear similar.featherstick wrote:What it will do:
Deny anything is wrong whilst quietly preparing their own parachute. Enable themselves and their pals to make a killing on the turmoil. Withdraw all forms of support from the north, north-east, and midlands, writing off whole parts of the country to devolved anarchy, and ensure that the surviving state resources are deployed in keeping them and their pals safe.
Last edited by Tawney on 19 Mar 2011, 16:36, edited 1 time in total.
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
- RenewableCandy
- Posts: 12777
- Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
- Location: York
- UndercoverElephant
- Posts: 13523
- Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
- Location: UK
Re: What should the Govt do first?? (when TSHTF)
If the EU continues to exist then its rules will be enforced. If we leave the EU then we can enforce our own rules.Tawney wrote:Would staying or leaving the EU make any difference? I would have thought that, when tough times come, compliance with bureaucracy will go out the window (inc. quotas). Everyone and their mother will be fishing in UK waters unless there are gunboats patrolling everywhere. Presumably EU agricultural subsidies will slump.UndercoverElephant wrote:My #1 suggestion: Get out of the EU agricultural/fishery system, even if this means leaving the EU completely. It would be better to remain in the EU with a completely re-invented agricutural/fishery system.
It has to be shared now.Would I be right in thinking that, officially, North Sea oil has to be shared with the other members in times of emergency?
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
- Kentucky Fried Panda
- Posts: 1743
- Joined: 06 Apr 2007, 13:50
- Location: NW Engerland
I'd do the following;
Confiscate all fuel and food, banning hoarding at the same time.
Restrict all travel, except for medical, military, government. Confine people to their homes with a strict curfew.
Marshall law in the cities and start shooting looters. Some examples must be made.
If none of that is effective, I'd take off the kid gloves.
Confiscate all fuel and food, banning hoarding at the same time.
Restrict all travel, except for medical, military, government. Confine people to their homes with a strict curfew.
Marshall law in the cities and start shooting looters. Some examples must be made.
If none of that is effective, I'd take off the kid gloves.