Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2019 10:20 pm
Can we try and keep this thread just to Brexit, and use the election thread for more general posts.
The UK's Peak Oil Discussion Forum & Community
No. The tories would very much like it to be primarily about brexit, but for the Labour Party and many voters it is a golden opportunity to change British politics in a major way, by destroying the tory party as we know it. Last night in the big head-to-head debate, Johnson continually tried to answer every question, on every topic, by refering back to brexit, and it was looking pretty stupid by the end. If he continues that tactic, it will backfire on him.vtsnowedin wrote: Is not this election primarily about Brexit?
There's only been 6-7 yrs of coalition government since the 70s.vtsnowedin wrote:With all your four party coalition governments has any one party actually been "In Power" in this last generation?
Yes it is. Though people like you would very much like it not to beUndercoverElephant wrote:No. The tories would very much like it to be primarily about brexit, but for the Labour Party.....vtsnowedin wrote: Is not this election primarily about Brexit?
All governments are coalitions because all political parties are coalitions.clv101 wrote:There's only been 6-7 yrs of coalition government since the 70s.vtsnowedin wrote:With all your four party coalition governments has any one party actually been "In Power" in this last generation?
Neoliberalismâ€™s useful idiots
Corbynistas pose as radical and yet theyâ€™re campaigning day and night to keep us in the capitalist machine that is the EU.
I wish people would stop saying Labourâ€™s Brexit policy is confusing. It is actually incredibly straightforward. Labour will kill Brexit. It will block the enactment of the largest democratic vote in UK history and ensure that we do not leave the EU in any meaningful way. It could not be clearer: Labour will betray millions of its working-class voters, its own history of Euroscepticism, and the values of Jeremy Corbynâ€™s own hero Tony Benn, by subverting British democracy and keeping us in the EU against the peopleâ€™s will.
Anyone who doubts this â€“ or anyone who is still, inexplicably, confused about Labour Brexitâ€™s policy â€“ only needed to listen to Crobynâ€™s comments at the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) on Monday. Corbyn first assured the assembled capitalists that he is not anti-business. Then he assured them that if he were prime minister, no harm would come to their beloved neoliberal institution, the European Union. Corbyn essentially promised the gathered bosses that he would override the stupid plebsâ€™ democratic wishes and keep Britain entangled in the EU.
He said Labourâ€™s policy is to get a good Brexit deal with the EU and then put it to the people in a confirmatory vote â€“ otherwise known as a second referendum. This referendum would, in his words, be a choice between the â€˜sensible dealâ€™ struck by Labour and fully remaining in the EU. That â€˜sensible dealâ€™, by the way, would include â€˜a customs union, close Single Market relationship, and guarantees of rights, standards and protectionsâ€™. So weâ€™d have a choice between remaining andâ€¦ remaining. A customs union, Single Market links, and EU-guaranteed rights and standards â€“ that is, immovable EU regulations â€“ do not not add up to Leave. By any stretch of the imagination. With complete contempt for the democratic will, and the basic principle of democratic choice, a Labour government would say to us: â€˜You can stay in the EU or you can stay in the EU. Itâ€™s your choice.â€™
This is not confusing. Labour would pursue a backroom coup against Brexit. It would not only renege on the democratic vote to leave â€“ it would then remove the option of leaving entirely from the ballot paper in a second referendum. It would deprive the British people of the thing that the largest number of us in the democratic history of this country called for: a break from the EU. Labour MPs, activists and bureaucrats would engage in a bloodless coup against the peopleâ€™s will.
There are so many things wrong with Labourâ€™s Brexit policy. It is anti-democratic. It is deeply dishonest, presenting the suppression of the peopleâ€™s will as a â€˜peopleâ€™s voteâ€™. It is an astonishing about-face by Jeremy Corbyn, who has been Eurosceptic his entire adult life, and who in fact has mocked the EUâ€™s tyrannical tendency to force dissenting electorates to vote again if they ever dare to oppose EU diktat. That Corbyn himself is now leading the charge for a second referendum represents one of the most shameful abandonments of political principle in recent British history.
Labourâ€™s determination to keep us in the EU, or intimately tied to the EU, also shatters the partyâ€™s pretence of radicalism. So much of what the Corbyn-led Labour Party wants to do, including monopolising via nationalisation the broadband market, would be forbidden under EU rules. The EU is a nakedly neoliberal body. As Tony Benn said, â€˜The EU has the only constitution in the world committed to capitalismâ€™. He said: â€˜It destroys the prospect of socialism in Europe.â€™ Remember that next time you see middle-class Corbynistas campaigning in the streets, with their fists raised, secretly loving dim right-wingersâ€™ description of their â€˜free broadbandâ€™ policy as â€˜broadband communismâ€™: these people are campaigning to preserve the UKâ€™s relationship with the only institution on earth that is constitutionally committed to capitalism and which is so disgusted by socialism that it effectively makes it illegal.
These are lefties for neoliberalism. Whether itâ€™s Owen Jones acting as Labourâ€™s unpaid media spokesman or Ash â€˜Iâ€™m literally a communistâ€™ Sarkar beating the streets for Labour votes â€“ these increasingly ridiculous people are campaigning for a party whose policy is to overthrow a strongly working-class revolt against neoliberalism and to keep the UK beholden to Brusselsâ€™ rotten capitalistic rules. Revolutionaries? Theyâ€™re counter-revolutionaries. Socialists? Theyâ€™re capitalismâ€™s useful idiots. Pro working-class? They are overthrowing millions of working-class votes and trying to ensure that the British working classes, and the rest of the UK, remain subservient to ruthless EU neoliberalism. These people claim they want to overthrow capitalism and yet as soon as millions of ordinary Brits demand a break from the globalist EU theyâ€™re weeping into their almond-milk macchiatos. â€˜Is this fascism?!â€™, they cry when the people of Britain raise their voices against EU neoliberalism, bourgeois buffoons that they are.
The only red in Corbynâ€™s Labour Party is its idiotic devotion to an EU neoliberalism that is red in tooth and claw.
Yougov poll today had the NHS overtaking brexit as the most important issue.Little John wrote:Yes it is. Though people like you would very much like it not to beUndercoverElephant wrote:No. The tories would very much like it to be primarily about brexit, but for the Labour Party.....vtsnowedin wrote: Is not this election primarily about Brexit?
Exactly.RevdTess wrote:While I approve any move against capitalist neo-liberalism, we mustn't forget that the Tories embody this far more completely than anyone else. They dream of making the UK into Singapore-in-the-North-Sea, and we have to be ready to fight this once the EU is no longer a political anchor. Leaving the EU gives great freedom but it could go either way and we could end up with something much worse. I mean, just look at what Trump's been doing.
No. There are many electoral systems, as we all know. FPTP is not the most common. See here.Mark wrote:Exactly.RevdTess wrote:While I approve any move against capitalist neo-liberalism, we mustn't forget that the Tories embody this far more completely than anyone else. They dream of making the UK into Singapore-in-the-North-Sea, and we have to be ready to fight this once the EU is no longer a political anchor. Leaving the EU gives great freedom but it could go either way and we could end up with something much worse. I mean, just look at what Trump's been doing.
But the other parties have major flaws too....
Am I weird to want a hung parliament, hopefully leading to a fundamental rethink of our political systems ?
I'm not a LD, but ideally moving us towards something more proportional ?
Or am I in cloud cuckoo land ?
Sortition would be my preference.Proportional representation is the most widely used electoral system for national legislatures, with the parliaments of over eighty countries elected by various forms of the system.