Assange Watch
Moderator: Peak Moderation
- UndercoverElephant
- Posts: 11247
- Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:00 am
- Location: south east England
Assange Watch
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-19259623
Are we going to stand back and allow the United States to execute Julian Assange?
This is bigger than Aung San Suu Kyi.
Are we going to stand back and allow the United States to execute Julian Assange?
This is bigger than Aung San Suu Kyi.
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18539
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 11:09 am
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 988
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 11:09 am
- Location: Ricky
- Contact:
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18539
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 11:09 am
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 6596
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 10:14 pm
- Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont
The United States tends to execute only those that have killed more then one innocent victim or a police officer. It varies from state to state but I think you will find it hard to find a recent example of someone being executed just for their political beliefs or for embarrassing the sitting government. The Rosenberg's and the A Bomb secrets might be the last example and that might have been quite justified depending on what evidence you judge to be credible.
-
- Posts: 8688
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:07 am
- Location: UK
When you say that the US has not killed people because of their political beliefs, I think what you really mean is that have not killed any Americans on Amercan soil for their political beliefs. The US is, of course, responsible for the deaths of untold numbers of people worldwide for nothing other than their political beliefs or, merely, for being in the "wrong" place at the "wrong" time vis-a-vis US expansionary policies.vtsnowedin wrote:The United States tends to execute only those that have killed more then one innocent victim or a police officer. It varies from state to state but I think you will find it hard to find a recent example of someone being executed just for their political beliefs or for embarrassing the sitting government. The Rosenberg's and the A Bomb secrets might be the last example and that might have been quite justified depending on what evidence you judge to be credible.
Oh, and they they wont kill Assange. What they'll do is leave him to rot for life in some US hell-hole of a jail. There as a permanent reminder that you don't F--k with the Yanks because, in the words of Bush, "you're either with us or you're against us".
The US is truly an evil empire.
Last edited by Little John on Thu Aug 16, 2012 9:28 am, edited 2 times in total.
- UndercoverElephant
- Posts: 11247
- Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:00 am
- Location: south east England
What is dangerous is that he is willing to stand up to them - that he shows no fear of American hegemony. That's what Al-Qaeda do. The US responds by demonstrating that it is above the law: "we can do whatever we want to you. No trial. No judges. Just solitary confinement and execution."extractorfan wrote:I do find it frightening, and depressing. In their eyes, does he really have so much power? Is telling people facts so dangerous?
- UndercoverElephant
- Posts: 11247
- Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:00 am
- Location: south east England
- frank_begbie
- Posts: 813
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:01 pm
- Location: Cheshire
-
- Posts: 1104
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 11:35 pm
- Location: Nottingham UK
This is very similar to the creeping control that I heard about from my grandparents who were living in Germany pre WW2. The former Stasi and KGB would be in heaven with the technology available today and the willingness of oppressive governments to use it.frank_begbie wrote:Don't worry, its for your own protection.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... technology
Scarcity is the new black
-
- Posts: 8688
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:07 am
- Location: UK
Fascism is coming. You know it and I know it. The important question all of us are each individually going to have to ask ourselves at some point is this:frank_begbie wrote:Don't worry, its for your own protection.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... technology
Am I just going to accept and adapt, or is there a point at which I decide to be a part of doing something about it? Something real and not just twittering about it down the pub or on places like this.
It's a question I am currently asking myself.
-
- Posts: 6596
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 10:14 pm
- Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont
stevecook172001 wrote:When you say that the US has not killed people because of their political beliefs, I think what you really mean is that have not killed any Americans on Amercan soil for their political beliefs. The US is, of course, responsible for the deaths of untold numbers of people worldwide for nothing other than their political beliefs or, merely, for being in the "wrong" place at the "wrong" time vis-a-vis US expansionary policies.Oh, and they they wont kill Assange. What they'll do is leave him to rot for life in some US hell-hole of a jail. There as a permanent reminder that you don't **** with the Yanks because, in the words of Bush, "you're either with us or you're against us".vtsnowedin wrote:The United States tends to execute only those that have killed more then one innocent victim or a police officer. It varies from state to state but I think you will find it hard to find a recent example of someone being executed just for their political beliefs or for embarrassing the sitting government. The Rosenberg's and the A Bomb secrets might be the last example and that might have been quite justified depending on what evidence you judge to be credible.
The US is truly an evil empire.[/quote]
I find both comments a bit odd coming from the former British empire where the sun never sets and the history of all that have gone into the tower of London and never came out.
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14631
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:36 pm
- Location: here
- frank_begbie
- Posts: 813
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:01 pm
- Location: Cheshire
Yes I'm asking the same question.stevecook172001 wrote:Fascism is coming. You know it and I know it. The important question all of us are each individually going to have to ask ourselves at some point is this:frank_begbie wrote:Don't worry, its for your own protection.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... technology
Am I just going to accept and adapt, or is there a point at which I decide to be a part of doing something about it? Something real and not just twittering about it down the pub or on places like this.
It's a question I am currently asking myself.
We need another Martin Luther King.
Someone with great personality, someone we can trust, someone to follow, to join us all together.
Is there anyone out there?
"In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated, and scorned. When his cause succeeds however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."