Open Question to Powerswitchers From RGR. Input requested.

Forum for general discussion of Peak Oil / Oil depletion; also covering related subjects

Moderator: Peak Moderation

Post Reply
Aurora

Post by Aurora »

User avatar
the mad cyclist
Posts: 404
Joined: 12 Jul 2010, 16:06
Location: Yorkshire

Post by the mad cyclist »

The law of exponential growth and exponential decay.
Let nobody suppose that simple, inexpensive arrangements are faulty because primitive. If constructed correctly and in line with natural laws they are not only right, but preferable to fancy complicated devices.
Rolfe Cobleigh
ziggy12345
Posts: 1235
Joined: 28 Nov 2008, 10:49

Post by ziggy12345 »

The relationship between thermodynamics and economy. Although not directly related to peak oil this need to be understood to realise the implications of an energy source that is not increasing

http://ecen.com/eee9/ecoterme.htm
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

I'd start by saying that 'peak oil' is a certainty (sometime) because oil is a finite resource. To demonstrate that we need to establish the origin of oil and refute the abiotic theory.
User avatar
clv101
Site Admin
Posts: 10604
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Contact:

Post by clv101 »

I presume you've read the UK Energy Research Council report? It stands head and shoulders above anything else as a comprehensive synthesis of the peak oil literature. It really is a fantastic resource:

http://www.ukerc.ac.uk/support/Global%20Oil%20Depletion

The juicy stuff is in the associated Technical Papers.
User avatar
Mean Mr Mustard
Posts: 1555
Joined: 31 Dec 2006, 12:14
Location: Cambridgeshire

Re: Open Question to Powerswitchers From RGR. Input requeste

Post by Mean Mr Mustard »

RGR wrote:...British peakers extraordinare... ...the peakers with the lowest percentage of crackpots I have bumped into online.
How condescending. :roll: But I think it was meant to be a sort of compliment. :x

Perhaps you could ask the folks at ASPO or ODAC if they have any tech papers? And you already have lots of knowledgable contacts over at the Oil Drum.
1855 Advertisement for Kier's Rock Oil -
"Hurry, before this wonderful product is depleted from Nature’s laboratory."

The Future's so Bright, I gotta wear Night Vision Goggles...
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14823
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

Sorry I've no science.

Just common sense.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
User avatar
clv101
Site Admin
Posts: 10604
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Contact:

Post by clv101 »

emordnilap wrote:Sorry I've no science.

Just common sense.
That's could actually be a problem. Many of today's issues are complex, 'wicked' problems. Problems that the conventional modern reductionist approach hasn't solved and do not respond well to common sense. They are counter intuitive.
RGR

Post by RGR »

Aurora wrote:Here's a good place to start: http://www.peakoil.net/publications/pee ... d-articles
Last edited by RGR on 03 Dec 2010, 03:38, edited 1 time in total.
RGR

Post by RGR »

clv101 wrote:I presume you've read the UK Energy Research Council report? It stands head and shoulders above anything else as a comprehensive synthesis of the peak oil literature. It really is a fantastic resource:

http://www.ukerc.ac.uk/support/Global%20Oil%20Depletion

The juicy stuff is in the associated Technical Papers.
Last edited by RGR on 03 Dec 2010, 03:39, edited 1 time in total.
RGR

Re: Open Question to Powerswitchers From RGR. Input requeste

Post by RGR »

Mean Mr Mustard wrote:
RGR wrote:...British peakers extraordinare... ...the peakers with the lowest percentage of crackpots I have bumped into online.
How condescending. :roll:
Last edited by RGR on 03 Dec 2010, 03:39, edited 1 time in total.
Blue Peter
Posts: 1939
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Milton Keynes

Post by Blue Peter »

RGR wrote:
Aurora wrote:Here's a good place to start: http://www.peakoil.net/publications/pee ... d-articles
I am familiar with the references involved, but that is still a good list. I was looking for a specific piece of the science involved that peakers think is the strongest component of peak oil, certainly I am not about to refute all science on the topic because some of the science is solid. However, within those references are the basis of support for some of the dogma I have mentioned.
Would you include things such as EROEI?


Peter.
Does anyone know where the love of God goes when the waves turn the seconds to hours?
User avatar
Lord Beria3
Posts: 5066
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 20:57
Location: Moscow Russia
Contact:

Post by Lord Beria3 »

RGR - in all honesty the debate regarding PO has moved on from proving its theory (numerious studies have shown a peak is likely within the next ten years) - the real debate is regarding mitigation and how serious the decline will be.

At one end is the fast crash folks (Ludwig here) who argue that as soon as we head of that peak it will cause the entire financial system to crash once growth has died.

On the other hand are others (like the Deutcshe Bank folk) who argue that a peak oil oil doesn't necessarily mean the end of the world. If that is the case, than it brings in anather debate on what kind of responces to PO are proper and sensible.
Peace always has been and always will be an intermittent flash of light in a dark history of warfare, violence, and destruction
User avatar
PS_RalphW
Posts: 6974
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Cambridge

Post by PS_RalphW »

Oil production will peak (or has, depending on how broadly you define oil) when the world can no longer afford the production cost of the incremental barrel of oil. It will not be clear cut, because of lags in the system, and the price that the global economy can afford is not uniform, some countries use oil very inefficiently per unit of (real) economic activity. Also, substitution at the margins will occur, as will increased efficiency, with a very long lag time as the cost rises.

Ultimately, human behaviour will change to use less oil because different measures of economic activity will be developed. (That statement assumes human behaviour is driven by economic theory, which it is to some extent in the consumer society).

However, big however: Oil is 30 -35% of the energy used by mankind. A peak in oil production is in practice a peak in energy production and a peak in economic activity because the rate of change in oil supply will be larger than the rate of change of alternative energy supplies and efficiency/behaviour adaptation.

To an extreme extent modern society is fossil fuel. We have built an extremely complex, high energy flow, low resilience global civilisation with an economic model which becomes unstable without exponential growth. The economic retrenchment required see us through the peak oil bottleneck is more than our system will tolerate. It must disintegrate.

The global food production/distribution network is part of that system, and it will be heavily disrupted. Parts of the world will see major starvation.
2 As and a B
Posts: 2590
Joined: 28 Nov 2008, 19:06

Re: Open Question to Powerswitchers From RGR. Input requeste

Post by 2 As and a B »

RGR wrote:it can be ... some irrefutable law of nature
Turkeys DO vote for Christmas.
Post Reply